Tom's Hardware > Forum > CPU & Components > CPUs > Intel to Launch Energy Efficient Core 2 Quads on January 18th

Intel to Launch Energy Efficient Core 2 Quads on January 18th

Forum CPU & Components : CPUs - Intel to Launch Energy Efficient Core 2 Quads on January 18th

Tom's Hardware: Over 1.4 million members in 6 different countries available to answer all your high-tech questions. Sign up now! Its free!
Word :    Username :           
 

Looks like Intel is planning to launch 65w TDP energy-saving quad cores under the Core 2 Quad Qxxxxe series:

http://www.fudzilla.com/index.php? [...] &Itemid=1]



I can see this being particularly useful for large server racks of course.


Message edited by AuDioFreaK39 on 01-02-2009 at 12:42:01 PM
Sponsored Links
Register or log in to remove.
- 0 +

desktop cpus... not server

AMD is going to release 65W quads early Q2 and 45W quads in middle of Q2
http://www.fudzilla.com/index.php? [...] 2&Itemid=1

Reply to Kari

Wow. Thats a nice drop in power. Wounder what their OCing headroom will be like then.....

------------------------------ http://www.steamcalculator.com/76561197970703804/camo_sig.png
Reply to jimmysmitty
- 0 +

I wants to see 4.4Ghz on air....

Reply to Dekasav

^I think the QX9650 can. But you would always need a Ultra 120 with 2 120mm fans.

but this might be a nice upgrade for me when I get some extra cash and they are under $200, since my mobo has thus far supported every Core 2 released to date.

------------------------------ http://www.steamcalculator.com/76561197970703804/camo_sig.png
Reply to jimmysmitty

Kari wrote :

desktop cpus... not server

AMD is going to release 65W quads early Q2 and 45W quads in middle of Q2
http://www.fudzilla.com/index.php? [...] 2&Itemid=1



The 65w Phenom 9350e has been available for over 3 months.

I hope you are right about the 45w desktop quad - I thought they were Shanghai.

And this is a troll post - exact same post at AT ...
http://forums.anandtech.com/messag [...] erthread=y

Reply to wisecracker
- 0 +

It has, but the 9350e is somewhat of a joke compared to a 65W Q9550e as far as performance is concerned. Also, IIRC, the Q9550 is already only at about a 70W peak consumption, so it might be down to below a 50W power level for the 65W TDP version.

Reply to cjl

Thats all nice and great, but lets see some price drops on current models, not revisions that cost even more than their original 95W pieces.

------------------------------ http://valid.canardpc.com/cache/banner/547515.png
Intel Xeon X3370 @3.6ghz Under Enzotech Extreme-X,EVGA GTX 285 SC, 4GB Mushkin Ascent eVCI @ 1066mhz, Gigabyte P45 UD3P
Reply to spathotan

^ For 65W, it's not that hard to undervolt such a great OC'er like the Q6600.

Reply to amdfangirl
- 0 +

True, though the 6600 is quite power hungry compared to the 9550 and other 45nm quads. In fact, IIRC, the current 45nm quads aren't that far off of 65w actual power use - the rating is somewhat conservative.

Reply to cjl

^ I wanna 45nm Q6600!

Reply to amdfangirl

I would like to see instead a revision on price :sweat: http://www.seoagora.com/img/589/d08l1104oulu/smiley2.gifhttp://www.seoagora.com/img/308/s08e1024rvou/champagne.gifhttp://www.seoagora.com/img/459/k08q1024glza/ecstatic.gif

Reply to universedo

C'mon 45W $80 45nm revision...

Reply to amdfangirl
- 0 +

Well, there are always the Q9100 mobile quads (2.26GHz, 45W TDP)

http://ark.intel.com/cpu.aspx?groupId=37033

Of course, they are something like $800...

Reply to cjl
Tom's Hardware > Forum > CPU & Components > CPUs > Intel to Launch Energy Efficient Core 2 Quads on January 18th
Go to:

There are 629 identified and unidentified users. To see the list of identified users, Click here.

Please mind

You are about to answer a thread that has been inactive for more than 6 months.
If you still wish to proceed, please ensure that your posting is original and does not duplicate or overlap any prior responses to this thread.

Add a reply Cancel
Sponsored links
  • Ask the community now
  • Publish
Ad
They won a badge
Join us in greeting them