Sign in with
Sign up | Sign in
Your question

Overclocking a waste for general use (i7 920)

Last response: in Overclocking
Share
February 1, 2010 1:28:57 AM

My home is kept at 65 degrees in the winter and I managed to get a constant idle temp of 22-26c with all voltages turned way down and CPU speed at 1.5 Ghz. I also noticed that I see no difference surfing the net or operating my computer (except for gaming) at these low performance profiles. It says a lot for keeping a computer overclocked all the time. Just will heat up the CPU for no good reason for no improvement in 2D performance. This is with a i7 920 processor and an H50 Corsair water cooler. I am a believer about the new intel enhanced speedstep. It boosts up to 3.6 as soon as I put on a game but otherwise keeps the system at 1.5 Ghz.
February 1, 2010 1:33:04 AM

I think it depends on what your general use is, but probably. There have been a few articles on Tom's that go into what speed is the most efficient under load, but really if you're never taxing your processor then these articles don't apply.
m
0
l
a b K Overclocking
February 1, 2010 1:36:14 AM

No body should be buying a 920 if they are just browsing the web or using office anyways. Thats what the i3 is for.
m
0
l
Related resources
February 1, 2010 2:12:36 AM

You are probably correct about the i3. I'm sure I just pissed away $500 on my 295 GTX and all I do is surf the net, play an occasional game, office, and watch a blueray movie.
m
0
l
February 1, 2010 2:14:11 AM

muratgemici2003: of course! OC'ing definitely counts if you're computing density matrices of molecules though!
m
0
l
a b K Overclocking
February 1, 2010 3:50:37 AM

Not only $500, but the larger electric bill as well. Depending on your game and resolution, you could probably do quite well with the 5750. Around the speed of the 4850/GTS250, but much more power efficient.
m
0
l
!