Tom's Hardware > Forum > Graphic & Displays > Graphics Cards > Call of duty World at War Performance Benchmarks Guru3D

Call of duty World at War Performance Benchmarks Guru3D

Forum Graphic & Displays : Graphics Cards - Call of duty World at War Performance Benchmarks Guru3D

Tom's Hardware: Over 1.4 million members in 6 different countries available to answer all your high-tech questions. Sign up now! Its free!
Ask the community Add a reply
Word :    Username :           
 
Sponsored Links
Register or log in to remove.
volcanicstrad37   11-10-2008 at 03:34:43 PM
- 0 +

I'm pretty disappointed at the 4850 in this review. It doesn't beat out the 8800's. weird.

Reply to volcanicstrad37
L1qu1d   11-10-2008 at 03:39:52 PM
- 0 +

both companies haven't released updated drivers, we'll prob see improved speeds, even though it runs on the cod4 engine, which runs off the cod2 engine, all upgraded with eye candy (kinda like source:D).

------------------------------ PSN: L1qu1dat1on
Steam: Darkerliquid
XBL: L1qu1dat1on
http://valid.canardpc.com/cache/banner/861526.png
 Reply to L1qu1d
jaydeejohn   11-10-2008 at 04:08:23 PM
- 0 +

Wheres the AA used? Couldnt find it. Thatll make a huge difference too

------------------------------ I went drifting, thru the capitols of tin, where men cant walk and cant freely talk, and sons turn their fathers in
 Reply to jaydeejohn
jaydeejohn   11-10-2008 at 04:20:40 PM
- 0 +

Also, do they always bench this way? No minmal fps? Wish theyd done a better job

------------------------------ I went drifting, thru the capitols of tin, where men cant walk and cant freely talk, and sons turn their fathers in
 Reply to jaydeejohn
jaydeejohn   11-10-2008 at 04:39:28 PM
- 0 +

k, thanx. I guess I was looking at the testing page, thought itd be there

------------------------------ I went drifting, thru the capitols of tin, where men cant walk and cant freely talk, and sons turn their fathers in
 Reply to jaydeejohn
L1qu1d   11-10-2008 at 05:28:17 PM
- 0 +

AA doesn't give that much of a hit in COD4 to almost any card lol, and this uses the same engine:P

------------------------------ PSN: L1qu1dat1on
Steam: Darkerliquid
XBL: L1qu1dat1on
http://valid.canardpc.com/cache/banner/861526.png
 Reply to L1qu1d
antiacid   11-10-2008 at 09:28:46 PM
- 0 +

that's pretty intense that a 9800gx2 beats the 4870x2 :P

Reply to antiacid
SpinachEater   11-10-2008 at 09:32:04 PM
- 0 +

So how do we all feel now that they are using the i7 setup that most people don't have yet?

Message quoted 2 times
Reply to SpinachEater
vochtige   11-10-2008 at 10:12:34 PM
- 0 +

as a pentium 4 user i feel the same like people are using C2D :p

Message quoted 2 times
Reply to vochtige
L1qu1d   11-10-2008 at 10:17:40 PM
- 0 +

SpinachEater wrote :

So how do we all feel now that they are using the i7 setup that most people don't have yet?



Well atleast we kno what top of the line does to the video cards:) Now with out bottlenecks we can trully see whats on top:)

Reply to L1qu1d
Monsta   11-10-2008 at 10:39:54 PM
- 0 +

Good to see the 9800GX2 still has the guts to perform well with new titles.
Guess the i7 will give us the performance boost with SLI or CF we have been waiting for, especially with the new demanding games.

Message quoted 1 times
Reply to Monsta
SpinachEater   11-10-2008 at 10:53:00 PM
- 0 +

vochtige wrote :

as a pentium 4 user i feel the same like people are using C2D :p



:ouch: JK. Are you still using an AGP video card?

@L1qu1d - very true. I am still amazed at the SLI and xfire differences.


Message quoted 1 times
Reply to SpinachEater
L1qu1d   11-10-2008 at 11:01:38 PM
- 0 +

Monsta wrote :

Good to see the 9800GX2 still has the guts to perform well with new titles.
Guess the i7 will give us the performance boost with SLI or CF we have been waiting for, especially with the new demanding games.



Actually ur half true, the Call of duty 4 engine loves the GX2, so the GX2 benefits the most from it, as stated in the article.

And I quote: "It does however has an intense amount of shader processors available in certain titles, and that does show. COD WaW is such a title, and the GX2 loves it. "

Reply to L1qu1d
vochtige   11-10-2008 at 11:49:58 PM
- 0 +

SpinachEater wrote :

:ouch: JK. Are you still using an AGP video card?

@L1qu1d - very true. I am still amazed at the SLI and xfire differences.



mm, maybe I'm wrong i hope i'm quoting here, because the forum has new layout.

No i use a pci-e gpu, but my mobo only supports a pentiumD 3.6 ghz maximum so you can say i'm limited in upgrading, so basically i run an old pc.

i'm waiting for februari. i hope a new generation gpu's are out, and that i7 is unbugged. if may pc can live longer, maybe it can survive until windows7...

Reply to vochtige
yipsl   11-12-2008 at 11:39:48 AM
- 0 +

SpinachEater wrote :

So how do we all feel now that they are using the i7 setup that most people don't have yet?



I used to feel the same as when I had a 2.8 Northwood compared to an Athlon X2. Now, I feel like a K62-450 compared to a Pentium III. :pt1cable:

vochtige wrote :

as a pentium 4 user i feel the same like people are using C2D :p



As a Pentium 4 user, you should feel the same like people are using a Phenom. :lol:

An Athlon X2 4600+ was a great upgrade from my old Northwood. Almost anything today is a great upgrade from a Prescott.

Hope you can upgrade soon. I noticed a big difference in going from single to dual core, and then noticed a smaller, but still real, difference in going from a dual to a triple -- but mostly in non-game apps.

For some reason, my sig doesn't appear when I post on break from work. I have:

8750 on a Gigabyte 780G board with a 3870x2, an Antec Nine Hundred case and Antec Neo 650 PSU, 2 gigs Kingston DDR2 800 and several legacy SATA 1 drives with one legacy IDE drive on a PCI controller card. Still using a 17" CRT too.

It's amazingly slow compared to a Nehalem, but it can hold it's own against similarly priced Core 2's (though Core 2 quads beat it too). I'm also using Vista with SP1 and I like it better than XP. Am I insane, or what?

Can't wait for the 45nm Phenoms, though what I want to see are 32nm SOI Phenom's rumored to arrive in late 2009.

http://www.theinquirer.net/gb/inqu [...] -move-32nm

Before anyone comes back and says "that's the Inquirer..." note that I said "rumored". When is AMD going to finally ditch SOI and go to high K?


Message edited by yipsl on 11-12-2008 at 11:56:29 AM
Reply to yipsl
kingtz   11-12-2008 at 12:37:30 PM
- 0 +

Definitely a disappointing show by the 4850. Hopefully updated drivers will improve it.

Message quoted 1 times
Reply to kingtz
pauldh   11-12-2008 at 03:03:29 PM
- 0 +

kingtz wrote :

Definitely a disappointing show by the 4850. Hopefully updated drivers will improve it.


ditto for Fallout 3 - http://www.techspot.com/article/12 [...] page5.html

Message quoted 1 times
Reply to pauldh
SpinachEater   11-12-2008 at 03:12:58 PM
- 0 +

Woa, a 1440 resolution benchmark...don't see those too often

Message quoted 1 times
Reply to SpinachEater
wahjahka   11-13-2008 at 03:02:27 AM
- 0 +

SpinachEater wrote :

Woa, a 1440 resolution benchmark...don't see those too often


i was hoping to see my gtx 260 in there butthey have the core 216 one :(

Reply to wahjahka
spathotan   11-13-2008 at 03:46:39 AM
- 0 +

ATI clearly has some issues here. No way in hell the 9800GX2 should be beating the 4870X2. Snide comments not permitted, only sanity.

------------------------------ http://valid.canardpc.com/cache/banner/547515.png
Intel Xeon X3370 @3.6ghz Under Enzotech Extreme-X,EVGA GTX 285 SC, 4GB Mushkin Ascent eVCI @ 1066mhz, Gigabyte P45 UD3P
 Reply to spathotan
kingtz   11-13-2008 at 07:20:30 AM
- 0 +

pauldh wrote :

ditto for Fallout 3 - http://www.techspot.com/article/12 [...] page5.html






WTH! This is even worse! HD4850 beaten by a 9600GT? My whole world just turned upside down.

Oh well, 8.11 seems to only address FarCry 2 and STALKER, so maybe 8.12 then.

Message quoted 1 times
Reply to kingtz
pauldh   11-13-2008 at 03:15:45 PM
- 0 +

kingtz wrote :

WTH! This is even worse! HD4850 beaten by a 9600GT? My whole world just turned upside down.

Oh well, 8.11 seems to only address FarCry 2 and STALKER, so maybe 8.12 then.


You are probably right there. FS uses the FarCry 2 hotfix driver and sees the same results. The 4850 is far behind the 9800GTX at 4XAA and in the 9600GT - 8800GT range again.
high - http://www.firingsquad.com/hardwar [...] /page3.asp
ultra high - http://www.firingsquad.com/hardwar [...] /page3.asp


Message edited by pauldh on 11-13-2008 at 03:17:08 PM
Reply to pauldh
Ask the community Add a reply
Tom's Hardware > Forum > Graphic & Displays > Graphics Cards > Call of duty World at War Performance Benchmarks Guru3D
Go to:

There are 1293 identified and unidentified users. To see the list of identified users, Click here.

Forum map
Bestofmedia Forum ©
2000-2009 Bestofmedia Group
Page generated in 0.620 seconds
Please mind

You are about to answer a thread that has been inactive for more than 6 months.
If you still wish to proceed, please ensure that your posting is original and does not duplicate or overlap any prior responses to this thread.

Add a reply Cancel
Sponsored links
  • Ask the community now
  • Publish
Ad
They won a badge
Join us in greeting them
How do I win badges?