I want to buy a new GPU for my pc but I don't wanna spend too much money...I was thinking of either 2 Nvidia 9800GTX(SLI) or an ATI 4870 or a Nvidia GTX260...I want to have the best performance possible and also I'd like to benchmark too...Which do u think would be the best of these?My motherboard is a Gigabyte n650sli-ds4l so I don't have the opportunity of buying 2 4870s - for example - and crossfiring them and I can't afford buying 2 Nvidia GTX260s!In my opinion the best combination is the first one with 2 Nvidia 9800GTX...I'm waiting your opinions...Thanks in advance...
I'd forget 9800GTX SLI. It costs more than a HD 4870 and more than a GTX 260, and it's not always working as nicely as advertised. For example here's a benchmark where a single HD 4870 beats 8800GT SLI (which is very close to 9800GTX SLI). The GTX 260 almost matches the 8800GT SLI too. http://www.anandtech.com/video/sho [...] =3341&p=15
Performance-wise, they're very close. For example 82 fps for HD 4870 and 74 fps for GTX 260 are the same thing for normal human eyes and normal LCD monitors. http://www.anandtech.com/video/sho [...] =3341&p=14
What kind of PSU do you have? The HD 4870 and the GTX 260 both require a 500W PSU or larger, according to Visiontek and BFG respectively.
Edit: If you can find another $200 later, and your PSU is 750W or larger, get the GTX 260 so you can do SLI eventually. If not, I'd say the HD 4870 is a better deal, especially if you don't have WoW already.
Message edited by aevm on 11-10-2008 at 05:45:56 PM
I have a 620 watt PSU...The thing is that in the first link u gave me, there's 1 a big difference between 2 9800GTX and a 4870...I'm gonna play at 1680x1050 and at that resolution 2 8800 are better than everything else...Eh?
I m not gonna buy 8800GT but 9800GTX...Also I want to benchmark but play games also at 1680x1050...I think my screen's max resolution is that...Can u check it out please? Samsung SyncMaster 205BW...But would it be better a 4870 or a GTX260?
Secondly, theres no point to SLI'ed 9800 GTX's with the 9800 GX2 on the market.
A 4870 usually beats a 260, but it depends on the game. Your choice would probably be dependent on your motherboard.
a single 9800 GX2 would push your current PSU, and two of them would force a PSU upgrade to a 1KW PSU.
I'm not sure offhand how big a PSU you would need to CF two 4870's, but you'd be just as good off with a single 4870X2, especially if you have a NVIDIA chipset.
The HD 4870 is better. On the other hand, the GTX 260 would allow you to add a second card later in SLI. (OK, you'd need a new PSU for that, something between 750W and 1000W, according to the nVidia recommendations. http://www.slizone.com/object/slizone_build_psu.html. Also, you don't really need GTX 260 SLI unless you buy a 24" monitor or larger.)
BTW, your monitor works at 1680x1050 max. For that resolution the HD 4870 1GB is overkill. The 512MB version would be just as good and it's cheaper.
Since you have an SLI board that would seem to be the best buy. You will probably never buy a second because by the time you need it there will be far better cards and platforms available... but you should get it, and hurry so you can get a free Far Cry 2 in the mail after registering
LOL at those benchmarks. 9800GTX SLI beating GTX 280 SLI, according to them.
Look, if you buy a GTX 260 Core 216 or a HD 4870 you will obviously be unhappy, even if it works perfectly. Just get the 9800GTX SLI so you can sleep well at nights, OK? Your MB and PSU can handle it all right. Just make sure you get 9800GTX+, not the older 9800GTX.
I've found a 9800GTX+ card but it's TwinTech...http://www.plaisio.gr/product.aspx?product=1185314&HYKARTAGRAFIKONMONTELO=9800GTX%2b&category=69977735&catalog=20 ..I wanted to buy a gigabyte card or at least evga...Is there a big difference between 9800GTX and 9800GTX+?
Yes, the difference is pretty big. Very big in some games. The 9800GTX+ is based on newer 55nm technology (as opposed to 65nm for the 9800GTX). This allows it to run at higher clocks and consume less and stay cooler.
http://www.bjorn3d.com/read.php?cID=1297
All right, this thread won't change your mind so you might as well stop here. You'll be fine with the 9800GTX+ SLI. Just don't get your hopes up too much, OK? It's not really the best, but it's close enough.
In Lost Planet, a single GTX 280 or GTX 260 beats the 9800GTX SLI, at least in some benchmarks.
In Bioshock, a single HD 4870 beats the 9800GTX SLI.
In Crysis the GTX 280, GTX 260 and HD 4870 all beat the 9800GTX SLI, at least at 1280x1024.
I know that and you're absolutely right but in call of duty for example 9800 SLI is higher than the others and the games i play are the most like this...Wouldn't it be better 9800 SLI for this type of games? Also, I want to hear more opinions, not only yours, and If you believe that a 4870 or a GTX260 would be better at games such call of duty please tell me!
Since he has a nvidia chipset, his options are this:
1) Get the SLI 9800 GTX+: You can add a thrid one later if you need some extra ommph
2) Get a 260, and SLI later: A bit more expensive in the long run, but should hold out for longer.
3) Get a 280, maybe SLI in a year: Much more expensive, probably not worth the $$
4) Find a 9800GX2, SLI if needed: Still holds up against a 280, and a lot cheaper. Getting hard to find though...
5) Get a 4850x2 or 4870x2: The ATI option; I would assume the 4850x2 would scale better than 2 9800 GTX+ in SLI, and the 4870x2 crushes everything in its path. You also avoid the hassle of SLI entirely with this option.
a 9800 GX2 is very expensive here...I'm gonna buy 2 9800GTX+...I have Gigabyte mobo...Would it be better if I buy Gigabyte cards or there's no prob with EVGA for example|?
2 9800 GTXs are stronger than 1 GX2, and have a much higher min frame rate most of the time.
The 4870 isn't stronger than 2 9800 GTXs in sli, but its definately alot more reliable.
I'd go for the 4870 or the 260 GTX, which ever is cheaper should be ur choice. I would go for teh 260 GTX since u have an sli board, and u might be thinking further down the road, that it's time to upgrade to sli
------------------------------Folding@HOME Team: 163116
Lapped CPU
Reply to L1qu1d
no they aren't the 9800 GTX+ has a hard time keepign up with the 4850 (which it does) and the 260 GTX is in the 4870 category. The 260 GTX also has 384 megs of extra ram, and if you go for the 4870 1 gig u get more
Personally i wouldn't go near the 9800 GTX+ revisions, if your going to sli 2 9800 GTX+ ur better off getting 1 9800 GX2, it will be cheaper, less hassle, and also almost keep up with the frames.
Personally I'd go with the 260 GTX for ur board, and no u don't need it to be the same brand as ur motherboard. I have Asus motherboard, and bfg 280 GTXs
------------------------------Folding@HOME Team: 163116
Lapped CPU
Reply to L1qu1d
I've been using two 8800GT 512MB's for a year now, and would have to say my vote for sure is 9800GTX SLI. More often than not that will offer better performance than an HD4870 or even GTX280.
Cost wise, it may or may not be a great option for you. If they are significantly more mony than 8800GT or 9800GT, I'd say go for two of those.
Oh, and buy whatever brand you want (like evga) ... no NEED to stay with Gigabyte cards because your mobo is a Gigabyte. (edit: I see Liquid answered this already).
Message edited by pauldh on 11-12-2008 at 04:12:54 PM
Thnx for all! I just wanted to check if it's better to buy a Gigabyte...!So, I'm gonna buy two EVGAs 9800GTX+ because I really loooove the cover they have! (I'm gonna buy NZXT Lexa case, so that the cards can be viewed! )
You are about to answer a thread that has been inactive for more than 6 months. If you still wish to proceed, please ensure that your posting is original and does not duplicate or overlap any prior responses to this thread.