I am looking at building a brand new computer system from scratch; however I haven't kept up to date with computer hardware for well over a year and as we all know hardware moves a mile a minute. I've tried reading reviews, but I honestly can't figure out what to look for for what I want, so I'm hoping some people here can help me out
Basically, I want a gaming rig, something that will run everything to date (Crysis, HL2, etc) at 1920 x 1200 with high, if not highest settings; as well as future titles coming out (Starcraft 2, Diablo 3, etc) with good results on titles for the next 2 or so years.
My budget is maximum $1500 AFTER tax (12%), I only need the computer itself, I have everything else.
Things I'm looking for personally: - A cool looking case (Maybe with some cool looking LED bars/fans/etc on it?)
- A video card that will last at least 2 years on new titles
- A gaming PC for Windows Vista
- I prefer Intel over AMD
- I Prefer Nvidia over ATI (But I'm open to change if times have changed and ATI is looking good!)
Things I don't need: - More then 500ish GB of HDD space
- A Blu-Ray Drive
- Water Cooling (Unless this is somehow cheaper? )
- A fancy sound card, I've never had a sound card and I find on-board to be perfectly fine for what I use it for.
I live in BC Canada, so sadly I can't use the awesomeness that is newegg.com (There prices are so much better!!!!) so it will have to be built at www.newegg.ca or www.ncix.com
I've read a bunch of the posts here and many of them have all different types of specs, but I don't know what a lot of it means. Any help you guys could provide would be awesome!
I cannot answer all of your questions specifically, but I personally love the look of my case and had to have it with my build last year, it is an apevia x-cruiser. They have lots of other cool designs as well, you may want to check them out if that's your thing.
As far as cards, ATI is kicking butt right now. The 4870 is a beast. I would also advise you to check out gigabyte motherboards, they have excellent onboard Realtek sound, I am completely happy with mine, GIGABYTE GA-M57SLI-S4 AM2. You'd need a 775 of course if youre going with intel, I suggest something like this:
price is reasonable and IMO they make a good board, I have 2 now and both are good.
I cannot help you on the CPU, I am an AMD guy but I am sure you will get lots of advice on an Intel here.
Are you going with Vista 64 or 32? I would suggest 64 so you can use 8 gigs of ram, Vista uses a bunch on its own and RAM is so cheap now its laughable.
Start with the best vga card you feel comfortable paying for. I suggest the EVGA GTX260-216:
http://www.newegg.ca/Product/Produ [...] 6814130400 Stick with EVGA in case Nvidia surprises us with a better card within 90 days.
An Intel E8500 is a good pick for a cpu.
A P45 motherboard from Asus or Gigabyte would be good.
Get 4gb of DDR2-800 ram in a 2x2gb configuration. Don't pay more for faster speeds, or better timings because the core2 cpu will not run appreciably faster.
it is the new sweet spot for quad cores right now. has a multiplier of 8.5x. if you do get this chip, make sure you get the new legendary E0 stepping. E0 overclocks much better compared to the older steppings such as C1.
it'll OC to 3.4ghz with an increase to 400fsb
it is the new sweet spot for quad cores right now. has a multiplier of 8.5x. if you do get this chip, make sure you get the new legendary E0 stepping. E0 overclocks much better compared to the older steppings such as C1.
it'll OC to 3.4ghz with an increase to 400fsb
Uhh...huh? lol
How does the 4870 you listed compare to the GTX260 Geofelt listed?
CPU:Help Needed Here: Is the Quad core better for gaming? I've heard mixed things that quads are better, but also worse as they are not supported by a lot of games.
it is the new sweet spot for quad cores right now. has a multiplier of 8.5x. if you do get this chip, make sure you get the new legendary E0 stepping. E0 overclocks much better compared to the older steppings such as C1.
it'll OC to 3.4ghz with an increase to 400fsb
Uhh...huh? lol
How does the 4870 you listed compare to the GTX260 Geofelt listed?
hehe, okay, so...basically the bottom line is if you're going for a quad (which i recommend you should), this chip is the best bang for the buck out now on the market. The Q9550 came out with a new stepping called "E0", many of the newest 45nm's chip on intel also has this.
so basically this is how a processor frequency is determined. it is determined by it's front side bus (FSB) and it's multiplier. each model of an intel CPU has a different multiplier. the Q9550 has a multi. of 8.5x and a native FSB of 333 so...
333 x 8.5 = 2.83 ghz <--the speed of your processor (higher is better)
The E8400 first came out with a "C0" stepping, and later came out with the "E0" improvement. same thing with the E8500, and the E8600 is a native E0 stepping processor.
so what is a stepping? basically a stepping is like a new revision for the processor. since processors always have room for improvement, revisions are made along the life of a processor to make it better by fixing functional bugs or manufacturing improvements. they are called "errata", so with new revisions of the processors, more of these are found and corrected which results in better performance.
so for the 45nm's, you have the C0 --> C1 --> E0 which is the newest and best and they result in a much higher overclock ability than previous steppings. Overclocking (OC-ing) is running the CPU faster than it's normal frequency to get more performance.
so what i was saying back there, a newer revision of a cpu will result in better performance/OC. so basically if you want to run your CPU faster, the next logical step for an OC is 400 fsb. so you would get...
400 x 8.5 = 3.4ghz ...so increasing the fsb from 333 to 400, you gain a near 600mhz in free performance.
and for the 4870 card i recommend you, it IS BETTER than the GTX260, there is no doubt about it. and the price is cheaper so the 4870 would be a no brainer.
when they did this review, the 1gb version hasn't came out yet, but the 1gb has some very great improvements. so definitely definitely stick with that good luck!
I seem to be able to build the PC for cheaper at NCIX, plus I don't have to pay for shipping that way. Only thing is, I can't seem to find a 4870 1GB at NCIX; am I just blind or do they not have any o.0
As for the quad core, is it really worth it over the core 2 duo? I don't want to end up getting a quad core and have a large number of games not actually use it and it be wasted when I could get the core 2 duo for $110 cheaper
it's honestly up to you, if the quad fits in your budget, i would definitely get it. but if not, duo cores are great chips as well.
i have nothing against duo cores, but in my experience, a quad gives much better overall performance when your in windows and just overall system experience.
i used many duo cores systems before, ranging from E6600 to the newer E8400, and all of my friend have OC-ed their systems, and i've had a Q6600 before i upgraded to my Q9450 now. to be honest, the quad system blows away the duo cores at multi-tasking and responsive times in my experience.
for gaming, people will tell you different things. some will say faster duo core chips are better for gaming, but for me, i say it's no different. there are reviews of chip speeds and gaming here on tom's and anandtech.com, so you can search them up and read it to make your own judgment.
i have a 3870x2 gpu card, and if you do get the 4870 1gb, that card will blow mines out of the water so...it's really up to you, but there is no game out there that i can't run on max settings over consistently 60+ fps, except for crysis, which lags a tiny bit at times but nothing too noticeable.
so if it fits your budget, i would highly recommend the quad, if not, get the duo-cores.
This will give you expandability to 4870 CF in the future with a PSU that should be up to the task. You should be able to overclock the hell out of that processor with that heatsink and motherboard. You're also getting nice ram with tight timings. The HDD is quick, umm what else. If you go with the things I mentioned you should be set up pretty nice. Ideas, thoughts, criticism?
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
here's a review on tom's comparing the 4870 512mb to the GTX 260.
http://www.tomshardware.com/review [...] ,1964.html
when they did this review, the 1gb version hasn't came out yet, but the 1gb has some very great improvements. so definitely definitely stick with that good luck!
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
The review also does not compare to the newer GTX260-216 version.
Here is a direct comparison of 4870-1gb and GTX260-216:
http://www.extremetech.com/article [...] 453,00.asp The net is that they are comparable depending....
Message edited by geofelt on 10-15-2008 at 08:14:52 AM
You are about to answer a thread that has been inactive for more than 6 months. If you still wish to proceed, please ensure that your posting is original and does not duplicate or overlap any prior responses to this thread.