Tom's Hardware > Forum > Graphic & Displays > Graphics Cards > The future of GFX is looking rather small
Word :    Username :           
 

Some info from a familiar name http://theovalich.wordpress.com/20 [...] -of-intel/

Looking forwards, by the time say Larrabee arrives , late 2009 or early 2010, a G200 would be 1/3 the saize today, or more precisely, well have cards out thatre better than 3 G280s in tri sli. You just gotta love the future, even as it shrinks, it seems less IS more

Sponsored Links
Register or log in to remove.

Yes, this is how it goes. Silicon will reach its limits though; we will have to switch to something else (graphene?) if we are to keep Moore satisfied :p

Reply to homerdog
- 0 +

@jaydejohn

 
Quote :

even as it shrinks, it seems less IS more

 

Tell that to a prostitute! LOL

 


Message edited by 4ryan6 on 11-19-2008 at 02:33:15 PM
------------------------------ Badges? We don't need no stinkin' badges!
Reply to 4ryan6

I always thought that went like this, the difference between a rooster and a prostitute was, a rooster says cocka doodle do ......

------------------------------ I went drifting, thru the capitols of tin, where men cant walk and cant freely talk, and sons turn their fathers in
Reply to jaydeejohn

28nm ? Thats almost 280 times bigger then an atom. Soon we'll need a new generation of transistors.

Reply to cyber_jockey

intel's roadmap is planned until something like 22nm and possibly less afaik. It's shrinking all right ;)

Reply to antiacid

even as it shrinks, it seems less IS more

Try convincing my girlfriend

Reply to SoiledBottom
- 0 +

Confidence issues? hehe... At a certain point things can only get so small... otherwise its just an ATOM... and you can't really tell an atom what to do... like you can't have a computer made out of a .4 nm transistor... it just doesn't work... you will always have to have some space... and then at that point all processors will do is instead of shrinking... they'll get larger... they'll build up and out

Message quoted 1 times
Message edited by thogrom on 11-19-2008 at 07:14:04 PM
Reply to thogrom

SoiledBottom wrote :

even as it shrinks, it seems less IS more is
Try convincing my girlfriend

lol the less she wear the more we see.

Reply to cyber_jockey

SoiledBottom wrote :

even as it shrinks, it seems less IS more is
Try convincing my girlfriend

lol the less she wear the more we see.

Reply to cyber_jockey

thogrom wrote :

Confidence issues? hehe... At a certain point things can only get so small... otherwise its just an ATOM... and you can't really tell an atom what to do... like you can't have a computer made out of a .4 nm transistor... it just doesn't work... you will always have to have some space... and then at that point all processors will do is instead of shrinking... they'll get larger... they'll build up and out




seeing as you don't really have a firm grasp on dimensions and sizes, here's a quick link for you:

http://www.webelements.com/copper/atom_sizes.html

Your average copper ion is in the double digits picometer range. That's 0.1 Ã…ngstrom or 0.05 nm.

Your average copper atom is in the triple digit picometer range. That's 1.3 Ã…ngstrom or 0.13 nm.

As of right now, we're looking at 45nm-32nm stuff. The intel's roadmap is planned until 10nm before 2019.

As for going smaller than that, there's big chances that a new "paradigm shift" will happen, ie DNA-based computing or something of the sort. Those ideas are tested in labs across the world as we speak. I wouldn't be worried that scientists and engineers will come up with new and innovative solution in the next decade :P

Reply to antiacid

I can't wait until I can download information through my skull port 3.0

Reply to SpinachEater

Everyone has to remember tho, it all started with adam..errr I mean atom

------------------------------ I went drifting, thru the capitols of tin, where men cant walk and cant freely talk, and sons turn their fathers in
Reply to jaydeejohn
Tom's Hardware > Forum > Graphic & Displays > Graphics Cards > The future of GFX is looking rather small
Go to:

There are 1007 identified and unidentified users. To see the list of identified users, Click here.

Please mind

You are about to answer a thread that has been inactive for more than 6 months.
If you still wish to proceed, please ensure that your posting is original and does not duplicate or overlap any prior responses to this thread.

Add a reply Cancel
Sponsored links
  • Ask the community now
  • Publish
Ad
They won a badge
Join us in greeting them