Looking forwards, by the time say Larrabee arrives , late 2009 or early 2010, a G200 would be 1/3 the saize today, or more precisely, well have cards out thatre better than 3 G280s in tri sli. You just gotta love the future, even as it shrinks, it seems less IS more
I always thought that went like this, the difference between a rooster and a prostitute was, a rooster says cocka doodle do ......
------------------------------I went drifting, thru the capitols of tin, where men cant walk and cant freely talk, and sons turn their fathers in
Reply to jaydeejohn
Confidence issues? hehe... At a certain point things can only get so small... otherwise its just an ATOM... and you can't really tell an atom what to do... like you can't have a computer made out of a .4 nm transistor... it just doesn't work... you will always have to have some space... and then at that point all processors will do is instead of shrinking... they'll get larger... they'll build up and out
Confidence issues? hehe... At a certain point things can only get so small... otherwise its just an ATOM... and you can't really tell an atom what to do... like you can't have a computer made out of a .4 nm transistor... it just doesn't work... you will always have to have some space... and then at that point all processors will do is instead of shrinking... they'll get larger... they'll build up and out
seeing as you don't really have a firm grasp on dimensions and sizes, here's a quick link for you:
As for going smaller than that, there's big chances that a new "paradigm shift" will happen, ie DNA-based computing or something of the sort. Those ideas are tested in labs across the world as we speak. I wouldn't be worried that scientists and engineers will come up with new and innovative solution in the next decade
Everyone has to remember tho, it all started with adam..errr I mean atom
------------------------------I went drifting, thru the capitols of tin, where men cant walk and cant freely talk, and sons turn their fathers in
Reply to jaydeejohn
You are about to answer a thread that has been inactive for more than 6 months. If you still wish to proceed, please ensure that your posting is original and does not duplicate or overlap any prior responses to this thread.