I have 4 co-workers that play starcraft. They all want to play Starcraft II. The best pc out of the bunch is a Dell, p4 3.0Ghz with ati x1050 256M. The others are celerons or worse with integrated video. None of them will play SCII. None of them want to spend a lot of money.
Here are the options:
1. buy a complete pc with modern CPU and a PCIe video card. ~$700 plus. This gives them full warranty support. at a higher cost tho. For that starting price the componants would be weak.
2. buy a cheaper HP, Dell or gateway and add a gpu and psu. ~$500+$200. This gives them some pc support and flexibility to add the gpu they choose.
3. Build a entry level gamer, with parts like a E7200/E2180/E and 3850/9600gt for ~$700. No warranty but more flexibility and better parts.
I would have to help them build anything. They may be better off with some customer support and a partially built pc. I can do it, i just dont have the time. they used to build their own PC's but the last pc any of them built was a Pentium III.
E6750, 2GB RAM, 400 GB HD at $320. Add a Antec earthwatts 430w at $50 and a 9600GT at $70. Total cost about $440. Could upgrade to a 4850 and slightly better PSU and keep prices not too much over $500. Extended warranties are available.
"The bitterness of low quality is remembered long after the sweetness of the price is forgotten"
I would opt for option 3.
As to warranty, a typical pre-built pc will have a one year warranty. The manufacturer's component warranty is often longer. For example, an Intel CPU will have a 3 year warranty. EVGA will have a lifetime warranty for the vga card, and Corsair will have a lifetime warranty on ram.
For support, these forums would probably deliver better support than you can get from any pc builder.
If you build 4 of those pc's, you may be able to get a small volume discount on parts.
Sounds like a good opportunity to have a "build your own PC party" With some guidance, it should only take an afternoon.
NEVER get a preconfigured PC cause your limited to what you can conrol of what hardware and software you can put in it. if you can always buy parts separately and builfd it yourself. with PC`s like dell or HP you get tons of crap software installed on it that you don`t need and low quality parts
I agree. I never buy preconfigured PC's. These guys either dont want to build or cant. I dont want to be supporting them for the next 2 years. I dont mind helping, but I have 3 PCs of my own to support. I might be able to talk them into building if the cost is minimal. Like an E2180+3850+etc.
I dont have the SCII min requirements in front of me, but i think min req. is Pentium 4 and Nvidia 7xxx/ATI 1xxx.
I imagine that would be really bad with that combo. scary bad.
I would not play it with less than a intel C2D 2G and a Nvidia 8xxx/ATI 3xxx. If i remember that is close to the recommended req. for SCII.
Quad core would be best, maybe a Q6600, considering it is a strategy game with little AI's running around everywhere.
Unless SCII recommends a quad, it is probably not indicated. It is very hard to code to use more than two cores, and if the game required quads, they would not sell very many copies.
A faster clocked duo is better in most games. Looking at the web site, it looks to me like a graphic intensive game, warranting at least a middling vga card.
HIS Hightech H467QS512P Radeon HD 4670 512MB 128-bit GDDR3 PCI Express 2.0 x16 HDCP Ready CrossFire Supported Video Card - Retail
A-DATA 2GB (2 x 1GB) 240-Pin DDR2 SDRAM DDR2 800 (PC2 6400) Dual Channel Kit Desktop Memory Model ADQVE1A16K - Retail
Seagate Barracuda 7200.10 ST3250410AS 250GB 7200 RPM SATA 3.0Gb/s Hard Drive - OEM
LITE-ON 20X DVD±R DVD Burner Black SATA Model iHAS120-08 - Retail
This is only looking at Newegg. You could probably tweak another $25-$50 off this price if that's the biggest concern, or easily add another $200 for a better GPU, more RAM with better timings, and/or a slightly heftier PSU.
You guys should wait until Starcraft 2 is out and there are benchmarks. If you can't because there's another game you want to play now, look at that game's benchmarks. In theory a HD 4670 should be plenty of GPU power for a Blizzard game, but it's safer to wait for actual numbers. Besides, performance per dollar gets better every month when it comes to both video cards and CPUs.
Just FYI, Diablo 3 developers are apparently using "mainstream" cards. I got that from an interview with one of them. I assume that StarCraft 2 and Diablo 3 will have similar requirements, and that "mainstream" meant HD 4850 or 9800GTX+. I may be wrong, of course.
Hmmm, when I read "mainstream" somewhere, I'm inclined to think of the card that an HP or Dell might include, like an 8400GS, 8500GT or at most, 8600GTS. Is that term "mainstream" better defined anywhere?