Download the Tom's Hardware App from the App Store
The reference for current tech news
Yes No
Ads
Tom's Hardware > Forum > Graphics & Displays > Graphics Cards > 4870x2 with 22" monitor

4870x2 with 22" monitor

Forum Graphics & Displays : Graphics Cards 4870x2 with 22" monitor

Word :    Username :           
 

Just a quck question. Im trying hard to decide what card to get. is there any point in getting a 4870x2 with a 22" monitor? The res is 1680x1050. Isn't it right that at any res less than 1920x1200 the frame rate, graphics performance, etc is more concentrated on the CPU rather than the GPU? Cos if this is the case then a 4870x2 is surely going to be bottlenecked by mt monitor and not perform to its full potential.

Cheers,

Register or log in to remove.

at 1680x1050 your 4870X2 2g and a 4870 1g gonna have about the same FPS but its still a better card. whit full AA AF the 4870X2 will beat the 4870 i think.

if you have the money ... WHY NOT !

Reply to boulard83
- 0 +

Well i had a 22" monitor before with mh HD 4870X2,well as i have talked about in SLI/CF FAQ, multiGPU shines @ resolutions like 1920x1200 or higher :) but for 1680x1050 4870X2 is very good too,no doubts about it,so if u have the money then go for it :D

------------------------------ The end is near...
Reply to Maziar
- 0 +

The difference in FPS might not be THAT obvious, but you will be able to max every settings without problems (AA, AF, Textures, ...). Eye Candy heaven ;)

Reply to Zenthar
- 0 +

Cheers guys, you have set my decision in concrete.......4870x2 it is :D

@Mazier : I remember you posting screen shots of your new 24" LG monitor. Was that much of an improvement on your 22"?

Reply to Peaks
- 1 +

Yeah its alot better that my old 22"bigger,better resolution and better image quality :) the good thing is that i didnt see any noticeable FPS drop from 1680x1050 to 1920x1200,it really takes full advantage of my X2 :D

------------------------------ The end is near...
Reply to Maziar

What is your CPU? At 16x10 res I don't think that you would see much of a difference between a 4870 1gb and a 4870 x2 2gb. There was another thread about this. I'll post it if I can find it.

***********************************************************

The topic is somewhat different, but also the same to make the 4870x2 work well you'll need a powerful CPU.

http://www.tomshardware.com/forum/ [...] w=0&nojs=0

Here is a Tom's chart for gaming at 16x10 without AA and a sum of since you didn't say which games you play.

http://www.tomshardware.com/charts [...] 0,798.html


Message edited by topper743 on 11-25-2008 at 11:22:47 PM
Reply to topper743
- 0 +

Maziar wrote :

the good thing is that i didnt see any noticeable FPS drop from 1680x1050 to 1920x1200,it really takes full advantage of my X2 :D



Why would there be an FPS drop? Sorry i'm confused!

I have a Q6600, wanna overclock it to about 3.4 - 3.6. I cant see the 4870x2 on the benchies topper posted up! I dont really wanna get the 280, would rather go with ATI. I can see that at 16x10 there is not a great deal of need for the 4870x2 as the 4870 1gb would have pretty much the same results. Im just trying to save myself a little monies in the future when i upgrade again.

Reply to Peaks
- 0 +

to boulard83 : thx :D

to peaks:well generally when u go from a lower resolution to a higher resolution,u will see FPS drop because the card has to work more to produce more performance.but with this card,i actually didnt see a FPS drop (in games like FC2,CRYSIS WARHEAD and STALKER CLEAR SKY) when going form 1680x1050 to 1920x1200.
If u look @ some benchmarks u will see some cards cant produce enough power for high resolutions.
For example when u compare 2 cards,u may see one of them works very well in both low resolutions and high resolutions without having alot of FPS drop,but another card may do well in low resolutions but as u crank up the resolution u will see alot of FPS drop.
thats what i meant :)

------------------------------ The end is near...
Reply to Maziar

RE maziar.

Your right !

PEAKS ! as i told in the top of this speaking. at this res, i dont think youll see a différence detween The 2 cards. im sure the 4870X2 is a better futurproof card, but is this worth the investment.... in 1-2 years there WILL be like 10-20 better card ... maybe for a cheaper price !

Have you read this news ?
http://www.tomshardware.com/news/G [...] ,6634.html

Hynix anounce a mem chip that have 512mb 7gb/s, the 4870 use 512mb 3.6 gb/s each....

SOOOOO ! i think card whit those memory chips are about to come out ... some soon. and those chip use less V = less eat !


Message edited by boulard83 on 11-26-2008 at 03:26:52 PM
Reply to boulard83
- 0 +

Your right. Im not gonna go over 22" and the max res for them are 16x10 right. therefore it would be a waste of money me getting a 4870x2. gonna get the same performance from a single 4870.

boulard83 : you said the 4870 might lose out whenit comes to AA AF but it cant be that much right? Nothing that is goingt o be too noticable?

Reply to Peaks
- 0 +

No a HD 4870 would do fine in 16x10,and wont hurt your FPS in most games.

to boulard:thx for the link and btw what is RE ? :D

------------------------------ The end is near...
Reply to Maziar
- 0 +

so a 4870 1gb would do eh ... because i have the exact same question as peaks, I have a Q6600, a 22" monitor, and a need for a card that would last me quite a while. If a 4870 1gb is future proof ... then wouldn't a 4870x2 be even more futureproof? say if he ever wanted to go crossfire in the future but only has a single slot PCI-E mobo like me, wouldn't the 4870x2 be a better choice?

Reply to djc604
- 0 +

If someone has the money and can afford the HD 4870X2,then its worth it :) even in 1680x1050 but a HD 4870 is a good choice too and will manage games fine.

------------------------------ The end is near...
Reply to Maziar

Go ahead if you have the money, it's a killer card either way :sol: :) http://seoagora.com/img/589/d08l1104oulu/smiley2.gifhttp://seoagora.com/img/308/s08e1024rvou/champagne.gifhttp://seoagora.com/img/317/s08b1024uzjw/content.gifhttp://seoagora.com/img/459/k08q1024glza/ecstatic.gifhttp://seoagora.com/img/460/c08n1024twxu/eeek.gifhttp://seoagora.com/img/1098/s08m1119gagq/wave.gif

Reply to universedo
- 0 +

I have decided at the res i am playing 1680x1050 i am going to go with the single 4870 1GB. If i ever get a higher res it wont be for a while and by then there will be something better out, plus crossfire is always an option. the 4870 is a good card and is going to give me excellent bang for buck!

Could you guys recommend any manufacturers? I was thinking Gainwood??

Reply to Peaks
- 0 +

Thats Gainward :D and its a good brand,other good brands are SAPPHIRE,ASUS,HIS...

Btw boulard83,u didnt answer me,what is RE :d ?


Message edited by Maziar on 11-27-2008 at 08:25:43 PM
------------------------------ The end is near...
Reply to Maziar

hoo sry, didnt noticed, its for REPLY:RE

edit1: im french from quebec ;)


Message edited by boulard83 on 11-27-2008 at 08:38:58 PM
Reply to boulard83
- 0 +

:D,i asked because in persian we have a word like this which means yes :D

------------------------------ The end is near...
Reply to Maziar
- 0 +

oh its Gainward, lol my mistae :)

Reply to Peaks
Register or log in to remove.
Tom's Hardware > Forum > Graphics & Displays > Graphics Cards > 4870x2 with 22" monitor
Go to:

There are 1874 identified and unidentified users. To see the list of identified users, Click here.

Please mind

You are about to answer a thread that has been inactive for more than 6 months.
If you still wish to proceed, please ensure that your posting is original and does not duplicate or overlap any prior responses to this thread.

Add a reply Cancel
  • Ask the community now
  • Publish
Ad
Ads
Latest best answer
I need a new video card - Help?
By Pinhedd, 6 hours ago:

6670 1GB hands down. The 6570 is less powerful and has inferior GDDR3 RAM which is vastly...

Best offers
They won a badge
Join us in greeting them
Top experts