Sign in with
Sign up | Sign in
Your question
Solved

What would be faster 7x430fsb or 12x333fsb

Tags:
  • CPUs
  • Overclocking
Last response: in Overclocking
Share
a b à CPUs
a b K Overclocking
March 8, 2010 12:42:03 AM

3.1 GHZ fsb 7*430
or 4ghz FSB 333*12
I had my e5300 @ 7*400mhz seemed
fast enough for my needs and Im just wondering if there is any point in tinkering since I run @ 12*333 now
well...whats faster I dont really have time to test for 40 mins I could use that time for playing games
...im at work right now

More about : faster 7x430fsb 12x333fsb

a b à CPUs
a b K Overclocking
March 8, 2010 1:23:18 AM

come on I see you reading
take some time and answer
m
0
l
March 8, 2010 1:33:24 AM

Which number is bigger. If you can figure that out, you should have your answer.

If 3.1 is fast enough for your needs, then i would personally leave it there.
m
0
l
Related resources
a b à CPUs
a b K Overclocking
March 8, 2010 2:27:33 AM

Truhls said:
Which number is bigger. If you can figure that out, you should have your answer.

If 3.1 is fast enough for your needs, then i would personally leave it there.



are you sure about that ? and I had it set to 2.8 ?
m
0
l

Best solution

a b à CPUs
a b K Overclocking
March 8, 2010 8:04:10 AM

4Ghz is definitely faster... If it is stable and your cooler can manage the temperature then do it.
If you want to do a quick stability test then use intelburn test. It will give you some good indication of stability within 8 minutes ( standard test 2048Mb 5 run). If your PC pass this then it should be stable enough to play games.
Share
Anonymous
a b à CPUs
March 8, 2010 9:29:54 AM

Can you not go 400 * 9.5, sweet spot!!
m
0
l
a b à CPUs
a b K Overclocking
March 8, 2010 11:45:19 AM

4Ghz > 3.1Ghz

What more do you need to know?
m
0
l
a b à CPUs
a b K Overclocking
March 15, 2010 12:40:13 AM

bus speed + lower clock speed relative to higher clock speed lower bus
yes Im already running @ 4ghz*333 low temps and its 100 percent stable
well games never crash and I can complete 3dmark @ just over 15,1xx pts so thats good enough
and 400fsb*9 is 3.6 with my low cache is that still gonna be the sweet spot you think ?
m
0
l
a b à CPUs
a b K Overclocking
March 15, 2010 12:41:18 AM

ok will try 9.5*400
m
0
l
a b K Overclocking
March 17, 2010 6:53:42 PM

400*10 perhaps??
m
0
l
March 18, 2010 12:52:19 AM

@spentshells: what vcore did you use for that clock?


I got my E5400@266x12.5 stable on 1.26vcore...and also 313x11.5 stable on the same vcore...but why does i had some graphical issue 313x11.5...

nb: i ran prime95 for 5hours and it goes fine...


sorry all for my bad english...thx...
m
0
l
a b à CPUs
a b K Overclocking
March 26, 2010 3:01:21 AM

roykumo
e5300 @ 4.0 11x364
1.3658V intel burn test is the only thing that freezes probly take the voltage tot he
nope 400*10 no good Ima crank up the voltage to 1.39x as I currently don't get above 51C
m
0
l
a b à CPUs
a b K Overclocking
March 26, 2010 3:02:23 AM

1.26 ?? are you running a stock cooler ? I have the freezer pro rev 2
m
0
l
a b à CPUs
a b K Overclocking
April 5, 2010 12:27:20 AM

Best answer selected by spentshells.
m
0
l
!