In this article, I'll be looking at both applications, Badaboom and the ATI Video Transcoder, to see what advantages each has and comparing performance and quality where applicable. As it turns out, there probably more differences between these two applications than there are similarities making a 1:1 comparison difficult; but heck, we've never let that stop us before!
Quote :
After spending a few days with both of these applications, I have to say that I impressed overall with what both NVIDIA and ATI have been able to do with GPU-based transcoding. The speed increases seen in both applications are truly astonishing with the obvious win going to AMD's Avivo Video Converter as it was able to beat out Badaboom handily. There is more to be said than raw benchmarks scores though as quality is just as important as speed for video to most people and in that area Badaboom seemed to win out, even when not taking the "garbage" seen in ATI's results into consideration. Some of the quality difference (and thus speed difference) could easily be lent to having non-identical encoding options set in each application. And because neither app gives us full control over what the transcoding engine does we may not be able to get apples-to-apples comparisons until a true third-part application arrives.
Super. Can Nehalem or Deneb beat them? Don't think so. Of course there are trade-offs, but the GPGPU thing is surely getting momentum.
@Jaydee - Now I'm getting interested as you were some months ago, pal.
In this article, I'll be looking at both applications, Badaboom and the ATI Video Transcoder, to see what advantages each has and comparing performance and quality where applicable. As it turns out, there probably more differences between these two applications than there are similarities making a 1:1 comparison difficult; but heck, we've never let that stop us before!
Quote :
After spending a few days with both of these applications, I have to say that I impressed overall with what both NVIDIA and ATI have been able to do with GPU-based transcoding. The speed increases seen in both applications are truly astonishing with the obvious win going to AMD's Avivo Video Converter as it was able to beat out Badaboom handily. There is more to be said than raw benchmarks scores though as quality is just as important as speed for video to most people and in that area Badaboom seemed to win out, even when not taking the "garbage" seen in ATI's results into consideration. Some of the quality difference (and thus speed difference) could easily be lent to having non-identical encoding options set in each application. And because neither app gives us full control over what the transcoding engine does we may not be able to get apples-to-apples comparisons until a true third-part application arrives.
Super. Can Nehalem or Deneb beat them? Don't think so. Of course there are trade-offs, but the GPGPU thing is surely getting momentum.
@Jaydee - Now I'm getting interested as you were some months ago, pal.
Opinions?
I'd just like to add that I've been using Avivo for several months on both my X1950 and my new 4670 and I have NEVER had artifacts appear in any of my transcodes like were described in the PC Perspective article. I've probably used Avivo to transcode at least 200 files over the last year or so (I record a lot of TV shows on my HTPC) and have been pretty happy with it. I do agree with the author that the user interface for Avivo sucks and that the slider for selecting bitrate is a little dodgy, but I have never gotten poor results so long as my input file was decent. Encoding speed was consistently excellent even on my old X1950 and I was usually able to transcode in a few minutes what used to take over an hour using my CPU.
I would say that I do wish that Avivo would allow you to apply some filters while encoding, but I guess that's probably a lot to ask from a free encoder. My hope is that ATI and Nvidia will work to bring GPU acceleration to some of the mainstream encoding programs like TMPGEnc so that it will be possible to do some more advanced editing and still have great encoding speed.
You are about to answer a thread that has been inactive for more than 6 months. If you still wish to proceed, please ensure that your posting is original and does not duplicate or overlap any prior responses to this thread.