Starting this topic to try and help because ...
All over these forums, and 9 of the 10 PCs I have to fix for friends and folks that they know with a messed up PC.
If you are spending big money on graphics cards and not matching a monitor that will use its resolutions, your wasting your money.
Good Gaming guidelines from my experiences....(max resolution you want to run and maintain decent performance)
Graphics Card
Nvida / ATI = Monitor's Native Resolution
9600GSO / HD 4670 = 1280 x 1024 *
9600 GT / HD 3870 = 1440 x 900 *
9800 GT, GTX / HD 4850 = 1680 X 1050
9800GTX+, GTX 260/HD 4870 = 1920 X 1200 (HD capable and look for contrast at least 1000:1)
9800 GX2, GTX 280 / 4850X2, 4870X2 = 2560 X 1600 (HD/SHD capable shelling out 1-2K for a 30" LCD monitor)
*1280 x 1024 and 1440 x 900 are very close in size. The cards listed are suitable for both its a matter of choice and performance needs.
ALWAYS run your game in your monitors NATIVE resolution!
Now that list is just for decent good gaming performance. If you want to max out that resolution on your game or have one of the cards for a lower resolution and want to run the higher resolution then pop in another of the same kinda and run SLI / Xfire and your there.
I know folks that get / do more with there card though overclocking etc.. this is just a basic guideline but if your trying to jump that resolution with a lower card try to get the highest memory version of that card case the higher resolutions LOVE more memory!
Lets talk about these LCD TVs posing as monitors. Anything right now that is more than 30" is NOT a monitor. It is a LCD TV.
You only want to do that if you have to have a bigger screen IE it doubles as your tv for a very large room. If you do have to get a LCD TV don't waste your money on more than 1 of the cards on the 2560 X 1600 list as your not really going to even tap into the benefits of a second high end card with that lower resolution stretched picture and granular screen.
The big boys on the higher resolution DO NOT perform as well on the lower resolutions as say a super clocked lower end card in SLI. The big boys are better equipped for the most parts to do BIG things. The GTX280 is the only exception but doesn't do it across the board. The 9800GX2 is an example of a Big Boy that isn't so good at lower resolutions but still beats out the GTX 280 and HD 4870x2 in about half the 2560 X 1600 bench marks!
Research your card and MONITOR together and find what is going to be the best for your GAMING RESOLUTION, not your synthetic benchmark.
In racing, you won't see a drag car on the 500 lap race, and vice versa. Our video is no different.
So a guy with 2 9600 GT can push out more FPS on Crysis than a guy with three GTX 280s pending on what monitors / resolution they are running its about matching!
Lastly know your game and its features. AA/AF pushes cards hard, and some games have simple engines and can run very high resolutions and settings with low end cards.
Hope this helps and please feel free to add or correct!
All over these forums, and 9 of the 10 PCs I have to fix for friends and folks that they know with a messed up PC.
If you are spending big money on graphics cards and not matching a monitor that will use its resolutions, your wasting your money.
Good Gaming guidelines from my experiences....(max resolution you want to run and maintain decent performance)
Graphics Card
Nvida / ATI = Monitor's Native Resolution
9600GSO / HD 4670 = 1280 x 1024 *
9600 GT / HD 3870 = 1440 x 900 *
9800 GT, GTX / HD 4850 = 1680 X 1050
9800GTX+, GTX 260/HD 4870 = 1920 X 1200 (HD capable and look for contrast at least 1000:1)
9800 GX2, GTX 280 / 4850X2, 4870X2 = 2560 X 1600 (HD/SHD capable shelling out 1-2K for a 30" LCD monitor)
*1280 x 1024 and 1440 x 900 are very close in size. The cards listed are suitable for both its a matter of choice and performance needs.
ALWAYS run your game in your monitors NATIVE resolution!
Now that list is just for decent good gaming performance. If you want to max out that resolution on your game or have one of the cards for a lower resolution and want to run the higher resolution then pop in another of the same kinda and run SLI / Xfire and your there.
I know folks that get / do more with there card though overclocking etc.. this is just a basic guideline but if your trying to jump that resolution with a lower card try to get the highest memory version of that card case the higher resolutions LOVE more memory!
Lets talk about these LCD TVs posing as monitors. Anything right now that is more than 30" is NOT a monitor. It is a LCD TV.
You only want to do that if you have to have a bigger screen IE it doubles as your tv for a very large room. If you do have to get a LCD TV don't waste your money on more than 1 of the cards on the 2560 X 1600 list as your not really going to even tap into the benefits of a second high end card with that lower resolution stretched picture and granular screen.
The big boys on the higher resolution DO NOT perform as well on the lower resolutions as say a super clocked lower end card in SLI. The big boys are better equipped for the most parts to do BIG things. The GTX280 is the only exception but doesn't do it across the board. The 9800GX2 is an example of a Big Boy that isn't so good at lower resolutions but still beats out the GTX 280 and HD 4870x2 in about half the 2560 X 1600 bench marks!
Research your card and MONITOR together and find what is going to be the best for your GAMING RESOLUTION, not your synthetic benchmark.
In racing, you won't see a drag car on the 500 lap race, and vice versa. Our video is no different.
So a guy with 2 9600 GT can push out more FPS on Crysis than a guy with three GTX 280s pending on what monitors / resolution they are running its about matching!
Lastly know your game and its features. AA/AF pushes cards hard, and some games have simple engines and can run very high resolutions and settings with low end cards.
Hope this helps and please feel free to add or correct!