Sign in with
Sign up | Sign in
Your question

1680x1050 crysis

Last response: in Graphics & Displays
Share
December 10, 2008 3:09:12 AM

what cards do i need to play this at 1680x1050 everything on very high with 8x aa. with a steady 50+ frams

More about : 1680x1050 crysis

a b U Graphics card
December 10, 2008 3:14:09 AM

3 GTX280s might come close, might not.
December 10, 2008 3:24:23 AM

k wut about 1680x1050 everything very high no aa or af. with a steady fram rate of 30 and up
Related resources
December 10, 2008 3:28:15 AM

randomizer said:
3 GTX280s might come close, might not.

lol
+1 :love: 
a b U Graphics card
December 10, 2008 3:33:57 AM

oicwutudidthar said:
k wut about 1680x1050 everything very high no aa or af. with a steady fram rate of 30 and up

I think a single GTX280 could manage that, but I'd need to check with someone who has one. If you play in DX9 with the "hacked" very high it is definitely possible.
December 10, 2008 3:35:09 AM

i don't even think such card xcist yet for that lol
December 10, 2008 4:06:59 AM

4870 x2
a c 130 U Graphics card
December 10, 2008 6:25:51 AM

Well you really shouldnt need 8xAA at that res and secondly 40+ 50+ wont really make a differance, unless you are really sensative to these very small quality/framerate issues. Personally i could tell the differance if i was looking but it wouldnt detract from the gameplay. Anyway you are looking at top end hardware to get even close to what you are looking for, as said 4870X2 or 280 and then if either of those dont cut it then get a second and run dual cards.

Mactronix
a b U Graphics card
December 10, 2008 6:51:27 AM

oicwutudidthar said:
k wut about 1680x1050 everything very high no aa or af. with a steady fram rate of 30 and up

I know my 4870x2 pulls that one off. I can even pull 4xAA at 1680x1050 with an average of 25-30fps (very high). GTX 280 would probably do it as well.
a c 105 U Graphics card
December 10, 2008 6:52:07 AM

Not going to do it. I can play at that res sometimes with 2AA ( ?? ) sometimes no AA with a GTX260. Couldn't tell you what the frame rates are though. Game is a beast on graphics. Maybe in 2 years we'll finally see a card that can handle the graphics and the bad coding all at max settings......... I turn blue and pass out while holding my breath. 2 4870's in Xfire can play the game smooth....even the final scene but 1 4870 tanks so I assume 2 GTX260's can too. A fast processor helps here also....3.4+ core2 or quad
a b U Graphics card
December 10, 2008 7:35:05 AM

Really? Even the final scene? My 24" monitor came in when I was halfway through the game, so I finished it on 1920x1200, but at 1920x1200, all very high, no AA, my 4870x2 pulled about 30-35fps through most of the game, but in the final scenes, it dropped all the way down to 10-12fps in a couple spots (just in the cutscenes though - not in the gameplay).

Oh, and agreed about the fast CPU. I have a 3.73 GHz i7.
December 10, 2008 7:54:48 AM

^i reckon! final seen nearly killed my 9600GT :lol: 

and that was before i had 8X AA :??: 
a c 169 U Graphics card
December 10, 2008 8:05:48 AM

Well my HD 4870X2 manages to run CRYSIS Warhead at 1920x1200 with 30-50 FPS solid with 0xAA with ULTRA HIGH quality(its possible with a config) cuz 1920x1200 doesnt have a noticeable jaggies i use 0xAA.
a b U Graphics card
December 10, 2008 9:48:18 AM

i mange to play crysis warhead maxed out with 16aa @1680x1050 with gtx260 sli but avg 30-35fps sorry not 50fps yet.
!