standby - str or not

[Guest]

Archived from groups: microsoft.public.windowsxp.configuration_manage (More info?)

possibly not right group but I suspect XP would prefer it to be set before
installation.

What are the advantages of STR (Suspend To Ram) (if any)?

At present I am using STR but find it is a bit too 'deep' and stops hardware
(keyboard, mouse etc) from waking the system.

Would normal (to disk?) be better?

I do 'Hibernate' after a few hours (in case I am called away).

This is a desktop system.

- R. Peters

 

[Guest]

Archived from groups: microsoft.public.windowsxp.configuration_manage (More info?)

It sounds like you are trying to set a setting in your BIOS?

In any case, I would imagine that suspend to disk would have the same effect
as hibernate.

--
Please reply in newsgroup.

This posting is provided "AS IS" with no warranties, and confers no rights.



"R. Peters" <russellpeters._@_.bigpond.com> wrote in message
news:un4h8KDGEHA.3540@TK2MSFTNGP09.phx.gbl...
> possibly not right group but I suspect XP would prefer it to be set before
> installation.
>
> What are the advantages of STR (Suspend To Ram) (if any)?
>
> At present I am using STR but find it is a bit too 'deep' and stops
hardware
> (keyboard, mouse etc) from waking the system.
>
> Would normal (to disk?) be better?
>
> I do 'Hibernate' after a few hours (in case I am called away).
>
> This is a desktop system.
>
> - R. Peters
>
>