Archived from groups: comp.sys.palmtops (
More info?)
On or about Fri, 27 May 2005 04:27:02 +0100, someone claiming to be Sam
Lipoff <lipoff@gmail.com> permuted the language to say:
>> Any comments about the difference between Tungsten C and HP iPaq HX2410?
>
> Yes, the Tungsten C is a Palm device while the iPaq runs Windows CE.
>
> Palm OS is a slimline operating system that is very stable, fast, and
> easy to program for. Windows CE is a bloated operating system that
> requires powerful hardware to run, is difficult to use, and third-party
> developers are rarer.
>
>> The reviews suggest that the WiFi range on the Tungsten may be limited
>> to about 30 ft, the HX2410 manual claims ranges up to 1000ft.
>
> WiFi is a local-area wireless networking technology. The range of a
> particular WiFi device depends on many factors, including some
> characteristics of the device itself (notably the antenna) and also of
> the base-station (and its antenna and power) and the physical shape of
> the surrounding environment. A typical home or office setup will
> generally provide somewhere between 25 feet and 75 feet of range with
> standard devices. 1000 feet is the often quoted "theoretical maximum"
> figure, but this is quite ridiculous. In a wide open space, and with
> exact antenna placement it may be possible to receive a signal at 1000
> feet . . . at extremely slow speeds. With a large external antenna and
> amplifiers this range can be extended to many miles.
>
> That might be more than you wanted to know . . . the bottom line is
> that the range on these devices is similar, and in the neighborhood of
> 25 to 75 feet in a typical environment. The iPaq manual is being
> misleading at best in suggesting that you can use it 1000 feet away
> from a base station.
>
>> Does anyone know how the operation of the e-mail program/web browser
>> differs on the two?
>
> There are many different e-mail clients and web browsers available for
> the Tungsten C, which is supported by a robust group of developers, a
> large user base, and many years of history. The iPaq has fewer
> software options, a smaller user base, and less history. You decide
> which makes for a better experience.
>
If this helps, I run the Tungsten C with both the native Versamail client
(with 4 POP accounts on it) and SnapperMail Enterprise with a very heavily
used IMAP account (1600 messages in my inbox usually). Both packages work
fine, but the Snapper is a better IMAP applicaition and works with our
heavily secured servers. I can pick up wifi at work when I'm within about
100 foot of a base station (we have them scattered all over the place).
The thumb-board on the T|C makes writing emails easy. Oh and the built-in
wifi means you don't have to swap cards if you want to get on line. This
means I keep a permanent full back up of my system on a card all the time,
and on the rare occasion I've had a problem I can restore the whole
installation on the fly with BackupBuddy VFS and not lose a thing. This
takes all of a minute to do. Brilliant device.
For more see:
http://www.permuted.org.uk/mypda1.html
--
Words
http://www.permuted.org.uk
http://my.opera.com/Words/journal/
Using Opera's revolutionary e-mail client (even for mail!)
+ Palm Tungsten C