System Builder Marathon, March 2010: $1,500 Enthusiast PC

Status
Not open for further replies.

skora

Distinguished
Nov 2, 2008
1,498
0
19,460
I find it funny Cleeve that you mention the effects of ATIs monopoly on the high end GPU market but nothing on the CPU front. How much better off would we all be if AMD had a competing product for the Core i5/7s.

Out of curiosity, how big is the storage capacity needed for your benchmark suit? I know you were over budget, but how close could you have come to one of the lower capacity SSDs and their performance advantages?
 
G

Guest

Guest
The labels on all the charts appear to be wrong. They're mentioning a "Current $1300 System" but I thought the current system was $1500?
 

anamaniac

Distinguished
Jan 7, 2009
2,447
0
19,790
To be honest, this just somehow seems disappointing to me.
But then I think of how much I spent on my rig, and got less, I'm even more disappointed.

It's crazy that prices keep raising on everything though. 6 months ago I was $9/GB for DDR2, in Canadian dollars. $12.50/GB for DDR3. It's absolutely ridiculous.
 

Crashman

Polypheme
Former Staff
[citation][nom]Otus[/nom]It looks like i5->i7 is not worth it for gamers. The increases when FPS[/citation]

I've got news for you: i3->i7 is not worth it for gamers. Tom's Hardware has an interesting article in the works.
 

Crashman

Polypheme
Former Staff
[citation][nom]p1n3apqlexpr3ss[/nom]@CrashmanSounds good, this something to do with the i3 HTed vs traditional quad thing?[/citation]

I think it's a Windows 7 thread shifting and dual-threaded games thing, since both the i3 and i7 have HT.
 

Stardude82

Distinguished
Apr 7, 2006
559
5
19,015
[citation][nom]SethVN[/nom]The labels on all the charts appear to be wrong. They're mentioning a "Current $1300 System" but I thought the current system was $1500?[/citation]

The whole comparison is BS. $200 is a lot of money where I come from and the stock cooling on the i5 750 is garbage. The low-end Conroes had much better cooling and they were only 65W TDP. I say stick your no-name heatsink on last quarters machine, call it a $1400 box, redo the overclocking and then publish the results as that way they will be at least somewhat relevant.
 

baracubra

Distinguished
Jan 24, 2008
312
0
18,790
Great build!

One thing I would change is the case...this doesn't look mean/rough enough for such a gaming rig, and there's no option of adding lights to interior to beef it up cuz the side cover isn't transparent :(
 
Seems like a fairly decent article to me. The increase in gaming performance is just staggering o_O

On a side note, whoever that gets this rig is very lucky, the i7 in this one is probably one of the more overclockables ones, it seems. Too bad I'm just north of the 49th :(
 

RySean

Distinguished
Nov 8, 2009
18
0
18,510
The RAM for the current build was incorrectly listed as:

2 x A-Data 2GB DDR3-1333 Kit
2 x 2GB (4GB Total), 533 MHz (1,066 MHz DDR), CAS 7-7-7-59

Feel free to delete this comment once it's fixed.
 

Stardude82

Distinguished
Apr 7, 2006
559
5
19,015
[citation][nom]Crashman[/nom]It's not just "any" no-name sink, it's one that provided surprisingly good performance in its review:http://www.tomshardware.com/review [...] 370-5.html[/citation]

Nearly any no-name heatsink would be better than the current stock cooling. I wasn't dissing the sink, the defensiveness makes me think there was some shilling for New Egg going on since Rosewill is just the name New Egg slaps on to "unbranded" imports.
 

e_marston

Distinguished
Mar 17, 2010
1
0
18,510
For those with a Microcenter in their area i7 920s are only $199 making this build much more attractive. So those fortunate folks could actually drop $80+ off the price of this system.
 


That's VERY interesting. I'm really itching to read it.

Given this: http://www.anandtech.com/bench/default.aspx?p=118&p2=47&c=1 in which the i7/920 pretty much smokes i3 (as one would expect; i7/860 numbers are similar), for your statement above to also be true implies that the same can be said for AMD 955BE vs. Intel i7 (limited to gaming, of course), as the 955BE also outperforms i3 in games.

Dang, I hate to sound like an AMD fanboy, but for gaming, this gives AMD an overwhelming bang/buck win, also based on the heavy platform limitations of P55 (vs. much more expensive X58), especially if you throw SATA 6Gb/s and USB 3.0 into the mix.
 

jedimasterben

Distinguished
Sep 22, 2007
1,172
1
19,360
The Lynnfield-based Core i5-750 employs an on-die PCI Express controller limited to 16 lanes of second-generation connectivity. Compare that to the X58 Express chipset's 36 lanes.
Seriously, does anybody EVER mention that the P55 Express PCH has 8 lanes of PCI-e available?
 
Status
Not open for further replies.