Sign in with
Sign up | Sign in
Your question

Would this video card be fine?

Last response: in Graphics & Displays
Share
December 20, 2008 1:14:50 PM

I found a special newegg is doing on certain video cards and I want this 9800GTX but it has no reviews yet and its by BFG. I heard they are reliable but what do you guys think?

http://www.newegg.com/Product/Product.aspx?Item=N82E168...

More about : video card fine

a c 171 U Graphics card
December 20, 2008 1:28:19 PM

Its fine, but thats not a 7900GTX. Thats a 9800GTX+, a very different beast. BFG is ok, eVGA and XFX are better.
December 20, 2008 1:31:23 PM

oops lol Thats what I meant was a 9800GTX
Related resources
December 20, 2008 1:47:13 PM

I dont. It's the same card. Evga has the best warranty and they have the step up program as well. But I'd just go with what's cheaper.
a b U Graphics card
December 20, 2008 2:33:22 PM

4870 would own the 9800GTX+.
a c 179 U Graphics card
December 20, 2008 2:55:02 PM

OP; I`d go for either the XFX or EVGA, just because their coolers exhaust all the heat out of the case, importaint if, like me, you have a simple case with only one exhaust fan.
And yes, the HD4870 would be far faster, but it`ll need a powerful CPU to make the purchase worthwhile.
Can you tell us your system specs?
December 20, 2008 3:00:49 PM

only a 4600+ Dual Core AMD, but Im going to order a Quad Core AMD or a Dual Core 6400+. Which one do you guys think I should get?
a 600 Watt OCZ PSU
2 GB Ram
a c 179 U Graphics card
December 20, 2008 3:30:33 PM

I`m sure most here will say a swich to Intel is in order so I`ll just get it over with straight away;)
Both games and `proper` software are moving towards Quad core so really the quad is the way to go, and more memory might be an advantage too, I`m running 32-bit XP with 4 GB of RAM and it`s much smoother than with the `mere` 2Gb before.
With a faster processor, you could run a HD4870 without too serious a bottleneck or the 9800 to its max.
December 20, 2008 3:44:33 PM

i will pay 30 more and get the 4870, its way better
December 20, 2008 3:46:52 PM

I dont want ATI though....
a c 179 U Graphics card
December 20, 2008 3:59:50 PM

No worries mate. I recently switched from a 8800GTS (640 Mb G80 core) the a HD 4870, and do n`t regret it one bit, the improvement in performance with AA is impressive.
December 20, 2008 3:59:50 PM

Get the one from tiger, that's a good deal.
a b U Graphics card
December 20, 2008 4:14:48 PM

The 9800GTX is basically a G92 (512MB) version of 8800GTS. The 9800GTX "+" is basically a beefed up or overclocked 9800GTX. Not a super huge difference. Though if you're buying new, I'd get the GTX+ as it is faster.

The ATI 4870 though, is definitely the better of the two video cards. As far as trying to keep yourself from upgrading again too soon, I'd suggest the 4870 if you don't mind the extra cash. It'll impress for sure.

Personally, I could care less whether I'm running nVidia or ATI. Both make very good cards. Right now though, in your price range, ATI has the edge.

I'll second the motion to upgrade your CPU too. That AMD 4200+ is fading out quickly. You'll see much better performance with something newer.

If you're going to go quad core, I wouldn't settle for the current Phenom quad cores. At least bump up to the Intel Q6600, rock solid CPU and overclocks easily on most Intel based motherboards.

4GB of RAM will make a visible difference.
Quad Core CPU will make a visible difference.
4870 will make a visible difference.

If you decide to stick with the 9800GTX+, get the one from Tiger Direct. Looks like a good deal.
a c 171 U Graphics card
December 20, 2008 9:36:38 PM

You don't want a better card? That makes no sense.

The issue is I don't think BFG's warranty is that good. Considering the possible manufacturing issues that Nvidia has right now, I would want to buy a card that has a lifetime warranty. (or buy an AMD.)

I would not get the card from TD. To expensive. If you are spending over $200 on a card, you should be getting the 4870/GTX260, not a 9800GTX.
!