Come on why is there a stall in the market to provide AMD chips the triple channel advantage? If there is an advantage. I would like to see a AM3 triple chanel Mobo to Dual Channel Mobo compared? If there is such a comparison to be made.
The memory controller built into the ADM AM3 processors is only dual channel, so there's not point in trying to make a triple channel motherboard. The advantages are fairly slim anyway and the mainstream intel processors later in the year will use dual channel also.
Ummm....... NO!! The integrated memory controller on the Phenom II only supports dual channel. We may see quad channel in the upcoming bulldozer CPUs, but that will probably only be in the server market if at all.
------------------------------Playing X-Men Origins: Wolverine Athlon 64 X2 5000+ @3.24 Brisbane | GIGABYTE GA-MA790X-DS4 | 4GB Mushkin DDR2 1066 | Plextor 760A| 2x 3850 512M CF| WD 1TB Black| Fortron Blue Storm II 500W | APEVIA X-Dreamer Black | Win XP Pro & Vista Buisness 32bit
Reply to megamanx00
For the average computer user, dual channel DDR2-1066 is more than enough let alone triple channel DDR3-1600. There no benefits to triple channel memory over dual channel if all you do is web surf, twitter, check email, and update your Facebook account.
Fact is, even for gamers a fast dual core and low latency dual channel RAM is the sweet spot; especialy if overclocked.
You are about to answer a thread that has been inactive for more than 6 months. If you still wish to proceed, please ensure that your posting is original and does not duplicate or overlap any prior responses to this thread.