I'm running a 3.5 year old rig now and am going to replace it in the next six months or so. I'm reasonably tech savvy, but I'm not a hardware expert by any means and I've never built my own system before (one of my greatest failings as a nerd.)
Anyway, I'm not really sure if I even want to try building my own or if it would be better to go for a quality custom pc builder. My last system was a Monarch, but they tanked majorly and I probably wouldn't buy from them again even if they still existed. I've heard good things about Puget, Velocity Micro, etc...
But still, I feel like I could probably do a lot better for the money by building it myself.
I'm looking to spend in the $1200-$1600 range. I'm happy with my Samsung Syncmaster 204BW, so I won't be needing a new monitor. I'm also considering taking my 74gb raptor out of my present machine and transplanting it into the new one. I don't generally keep a lot of media or more than 2 games on my PC at once, so the size hasn't been a problem for me. I imagine it might become an issue in a few years, but it would be easy enough to upgrade when the time comes. That said, I'm still running XP pro and I should probably upgrade to Vista.
So some basic questions:
1. Given my pricepoint, how much can I expect to "save" by building it myself? I'm going to spend the same amount of money either way, so when I say "save" I mean the difference between how much would I have to spend from a builder to get an equivalent system to what I can build in my price range.
2. How difficult is a typical building process? How many hours can I expect to spend before I get the thing stable, ballpark?
3. What is the risk of a "critical failure" in which a new builder botches something badly enough to require part replacement?
4. What is the difference in reliability between home and pro built?
5. What kinds of tools (beyond the basic screwdriver and such) will I need?
6. Is it realistic to think that I can successfully get a decent OC on my first try given intelligent component selection?
Any other basic information about the process would be very much appreciated.
FWIW, I'm mainly looking for a gaming PC -- I typically play mostly MMO, competitive RTS, and casual FPS. Ideally I'd end up with enough power to handle very large scale pvp encounters on MMOs (currently Warhammer Online), good performance on high settings for RTS games, and at least respectable performance on decent settings for FPS. I do not need to have silken performance at absolue max settings for the newest FPS games or anything.
Ideally, my goal is to stretch each PC I buy out for about 4 years. Obviously it's impossible to predict what system reqs will look like 4 years down the line, but so far this rubric has worked for me over my last 2 purchases, each of which performed great in the first few years, and lagged a bit in the last year or so while maintaining playability.
Thanks in advance for your replies, I really appreciate it.
Anyway, I'm not really sure if I even want to try building my own or if it would be better to go for a quality custom pc builder. My last system was a Monarch, but they tanked majorly and I probably wouldn't buy from them again even if they still existed. I've heard good things about Puget, Velocity Micro, etc...
But still, I feel like I could probably do a lot better for the money by building it myself.
I'm looking to spend in the $1200-$1600 range. I'm happy with my Samsung Syncmaster 204BW, so I won't be needing a new monitor. I'm also considering taking my 74gb raptor out of my present machine and transplanting it into the new one. I don't generally keep a lot of media or more than 2 games on my PC at once, so the size hasn't been a problem for me. I imagine it might become an issue in a few years, but it would be easy enough to upgrade when the time comes. That said, I'm still running XP pro and I should probably upgrade to Vista.
So some basic questions:
1. Given my pricepoint, how much can I expect to "save" by building it myself? I'm going to spend the same amount of money either way, so when I say "save" I mean the difference between how much would I have to spend from a builder to get an equivalent system to what I can build in my price range.
2. How difficult is a typical building process? How many hours can I expect to spend before I get the thing stable, ballpark?
3. What is the risk of a "critical failure" in which a new builder botches something badly enough to require part replacement?
4. What is the difference in reliability between home and pro built?
5. What kinds of tools (beyond the basic screwdriver and such) will I need?
6. Is it realistic to think that I can successfully get a decent OC on my first try given intelligent component selection?
Any other basic information about the process would be very much appreciated.
FWIW, I'm mainly looking for a gaming PC -- I typically play mostly MMO, competitive RTS, and casual FPS. Ideally I'd end up with enough power to handle very large scale pvp encounters on MMOs (currently Warhammer Online), good performance on high settings for RTS games, and at least respectable performance on decent settings for FPS. I do not need to have silken performance at absolue max settings for the newest FPS games or anything.
Ideally, my goal is to stretch each PC I buy out for about 4 years. Obviously it's impossible to predict what system reqs will look like 4 years down the line, but so far this rubric has worked for me over my last 2 purchases, each of which performed great in the first few years, and lagged a bit in the last year or so while maintaining playability.
Thanks in advance for your replies, I really appreciate it.