The real problem of communications isn't the lack of spectrum (though
getting more, like the 700-800 MHz range, certainly can make things
easier) but the lack of money to upgrade antiquated equipment to have
what is the current state of the art. If that money had been there
all along, the communications would be better than it was. But it
would not have been perfect because of the scale of the disaster and
the distances involved without functional communications infrastructure.
Nationwide emergency communications needs to include a full selection
of HF (3-30 MHz) frequencies, with every agency having the capability.
The last paragraph of the article suggests that everyone but broadcasters
are in line for a speedier transition. I suggest that the manufacturers
of TV sets are also not in line for a speedier transition. There needs
to be 8VSB/ATSC support in _every_ new model of TV set well before the
transition. Expediting the "tuner mandate" to "100%" for _all_ TV sets
(no exceptions based on screen size) would be an essential part of this.
Archived from groups: alt.video.digital-tv (More info?)
On 21 Sep 2005 19:43:14 GMT, phil-news-nospam@ipal.net
posted:
>There needs
>to be 8VSB/ATSC support in _every_ new model of TV set well before the
>transition. Expediting the "tuner mandate" to "100%" for _all_ TV sets
>(no exceptions based on screen size) would be an essential part of this.
Looks like TV set makers are producing just monitors to get
around the ATSC tuner mandate (the mandate requires an ATSC
tuner only when there is an NTSC tuner in the TV).
Provided a cable/satellite/xDSL STB has direct video and
audio outputs, the lack of an NTSC tuner isn't a problem.
Kirk Bayne
alt.video.digital-tv Home Page
<http://www.geocities.com/lislislislis/avdtv.htm>
Archived from groups: alt.video.digital-tv (More info?)
K. B. wrote:
> On 21 Sep 2005 19:43:14 GMT, phil-news-nospam@ipal.net
> posted:
>
>
>>There needs
>>to be 8VSB/ATSC support in _every_ new model of TV set well before the
>>transition. Expediting the "tuner mandate" to "100%" for _all_ TV sets
>>(no exceptions based on screen size) would be an essential part of this.
>
>
> Looks like TV set makers are producing just monitors to get
> around the ATSC tuner mandate (the mandate requires an ATSC
> tuner only when there is an NTSC tuner in the TV).
>
> Provided a cable/satellite/xDSL STB has direct video and
> audio outputs, the lack of an NTSC tuner isn't a problem.
>
> Kirk Bayne
> alt.video.digital-tv Home Page
> <http://www.geocities.com/lislislislis/avdtv.htm>
As predicted years ago even before the mandate.
Recently I counted half of all DTV sets at best buy were monitors. It is
crazy to pay even $10 more for an ATSC tuner if you are connecting to
cable.
Archived from groups: alt.video.digital-tv (More info?)
Bob Miller wrote:
>
> K. B. wrote:
> > On 21 Sep 2005 19:43:14 GMT, phil-news-nospam@ipal.net
> > posted:
> >
> >
> >>There needs
> >>to be 8VSB/ATSC support in _every_ new model of TV set well before the
> >>transition. Expediting the "tuner mandate" to "100%" for _all_ TV sets
> >>(no exceptions based on screen size) would be an essential part of this.
> >
> >
> > Looks like TV set makers are producing just monitors to get
> > around the ATSC tuner mandate (the mandate requires an ATSC
> > tuner only when there is an NTSC tuner in the TV).
> >
> > Provided a cable/satellite/xDSL STB has direct video and
> > audio outputs, the lack of an NTSC tuner isn't a problem.
> >
> > Kirk Bayne
> > alt.video.digital-tv Home Page
> > <http://www.geocities.com/lislislislis/avdtv.htm>
>
> As predicted years ago even before the mandate.
>
> Recently I counted half of all DTV sets at best buy were monitors. It is
> crazy to pay even $10 more for an ATSC tuner if you are connecting to
> cable.
>
> Bob Miller
Bob, I need both Cable and ATSC OTA Digital tuner to get the full
coverage of HD Programming... Our local TW Cable Co does not
carry
FOX-HD, UPN-HD, nor WB-HD in GBay, WI currently for various
reasons.....
All our 7 local Network stations are at local full power, HD OTA
now....
Only if your local cable Co supports/shows all 7 big OTA HD
Networks.....
then your $10 bill digital tuner story carries weight......
Archived from groups: alt.video.digital-tv (More info?)
>As predicted years ago even before the mandate.
>
>Recently I counted half of all DTV sets at best buy were monitors. It is
> crazy to pay even $10 more for an ATSC tuner if you are connecting to
>cable.
It is crazy to pay more for an ATSC tuner if you are connecting
*ONLY* to cable and it never has an outage. I don't know of any
cable system like that in existence.
Archived from groups: alt.video.digital-tv (More info?)
Gordon Burditt wrote:
>>As predicted years ago even before the mandate.
>>
>>Recently I counted half of all DTV sets at best buy were monitors. It is
>> crazy to pay even $10 more for an ATSC tuner if you are connecting to
>>cable.
>
>
> It is crazy to pay more for an ATSC tuner if you are connecting
> *ONLY* to cable and it never has an outage. I don't know of any
> cable system like that in existence.
>
>
>>Bob Miller
>
>
> Gordon L. Burditt
I would argue that most people connected to cable are ONLY connected to
cable. Anyone under thirty today has an even chance of not even knowing
about what an OTA TV antenna even is.
My daughters for example were amazed when I first got involved with
8-VSB and COFDM that "TV" could even be plucked out of the air. It was
state of the art magic to them. To them cable WAS TV.
As far as outages go we had an outage here in New York City a few years
ago and they only recently got back up and running. OTA in the US still
depends on the grotesque big stick approach to broadcasting which is the
most vulnerable to outages of any TV system.
Archived from groups: alt.video.digital-tv (More info?)
On Thu, 22 Sep 2005 07:59:05 -0500 Doug McDonald <mcdonald@snpoam_scs.uiuc.edu> wrote:
| K. B. wrote:
|
|>
|> Provided a cable/satellite/xDSL STB has direct video and
|> audio outputs, the lack of an NTSC tuner isn't a problem.
|
|
| Except it means you need two external boxes for PIP.
Good point. When I get around to a store selling TVs, I'll be sure to
ask for a demonstration of the PIP feature (despite having no interest
in the feature for actual use) just to see of the sales droid doing the
demo will squirm.
| OF course, **I** now need two external boxes for PIP,
| since I no longer use NTSC at all, and have a set without ATSC.
Archived from groups: alt.video.digital-tv (More info?)
On Thu, 22 Sep 2005 03:03:56 GMT K. B. <hotmail.com@lis2lis2> wrote:
| On 21 Sep 2005 19:43:14 GMT, phil-news-nospam@ipal.net
| posted:
|
|>There needs
|>to be 8VSB/ATSC support in _every_ new model of TV set well before the
|>transition. Expediting the "tuner mandate" to "100%" for _all_ TV sets
|>(no exceptions based on screen size) would be an essential part of this.
|
| Looks like TV set makers are producing just monitors to get
| around the ATSC tuner mandate (the mandate requires an ATSC
| tuner only when there is an NTSC tuner in the TV).
And this cuts the costs, too.
But I wonder if they would be doing this even if there had not been a
tuner mandate, even past the analog cutoff date (whenever it happens).
Even without a law requiring it, once analog is cut off, an analog-only
tuner has little value.
| Provided a cable/satellite/xDSL STB has direct video and
| audio outputs, the lack of an NTSC tuner isn't a problem.
Archived from groups: alt.video.digital-tv (More info?)
phil-news-nospam@ipal.net wrote:
> | OF course, **I** now need two external boxes for PIP,
> | since I no longer use NTSC at all, and have a set without ATSC.
>
> How many STBs will your cable company provide?
>
I have no cable company, of course.
I have two ATSC boxes, connected to component inputs, two
DVD players (one connected to S-video, one [used only for
CD, SACD, and audio-DVD] connected to composite), a satellite
box connected via S-Video, and a VHS connected to composite.
You are about to answer a thread that has been inactive for more than 6 months. If you still wish to proceed, please ensure that your posting is original and does not duplicate or overlap any prior responses to this thread.