You don't need benchmarks. Core i7 wins, in almost every single benchmarks, in almost every single category. Core 2 Quad is known to have bottleneck issues when pairing with 2 or more CPUs. Under that circumstance, usually Core 2 Quads are outperformed by AMD's K10.
Core i7 outperformed dual AMD Shanghai (45nm K10) in both integer and floating points benchmarks, I/O benchmarks, etc. Suffice to say that if you want pure performance, Core i7 will satisfy you.
------------------------------Intel will not take the top spot, or probably the top 3 spot back for the forseeable future. Not even with 32nm and more cores will intel be able to beat Jaguar. - JennyH the AMDiot, Nov 2009
Reply to yomamafor1
One of the several reasons why Skulltrail failed miserably.
Same can be said for Quad FX. In general multiple physical CPU's typically isnt a wise idea unless your running a REAL server, with REAL server hardware. But then again...its still i7.
Message edited by spathotan on 02-25-2009 at 05:41:14 AM
I upgraded to the i7 from an Intel Core 2 Duo E8400. The main reasons I made the upgrade were:
1. Low power consumption (significantly lower than a Q6600 which is about $100 cheaper than the i7)
2. 8 logical cores available (quad core + hyper threading)
3. The ability to play cutting edge games that take advantage of all 8 cores.
4. The potential ability to load share between CPU & GPU once Windows 7 is released.
The upgrade might have been a bit premature, as the primary reason to buy an I7 processor won't be possible until Windows 7 is released. Windows 7 will allow load sharing between GPU (graphics card) and CPU. This will enable some really nice performance gains in games, or other graphic intensive applications like video editing software. Allegedly, games like Crysis will get a 20-30 percent performance increase. However, I heard that before when Windows stated that Vista would provide significant performance gains for DirectX10 games, which has not proved to be the case.
Regardless, the i7 920 is truly an amazing CPU. I've yet to experiment with overclocking much, but I do have it running at 3.12ghz stable and with a core temperature of 41C at idle and around 60C under load. I'll likely push things further in the coming weeks, and I'll give updates on temperatures and performance when I do.
Combining this card with two 4870hd 512mb graphics cards in Crossfire mode produced a 3DMark06 score of just over 19,000! That is a 5,000 point gain from my previous rig, and is in about the top 4% of all systems out there. That is pretty phenomenal performance. In Crysis with all settings at very high and DX10, I average over 50 frames at 1980x1200. This CPU is a gaming beast.
If you plan to overclock this card even a little, invest in an aftermarket heat sink and some Arctic Silver thermal compound. The heatsink provided with the retail package is small and ineffective at cooling an overclocked card. I recommend this Zalman Cpu Cooler for moderate overclocking. It is a very quite and very effective fan.
If your in the market for a 'future-proof' processor, this is a great option at a reasonable price point. The ceiling speed of processors is growing increasingly unimportant as multi-thread programing become the norm in both games and applications. You could spend a lot more for a higher GHZ CPU, but you're not really gaining as much performance as the jump from 2 to 4 cores, and then quad core to octo core. This processor will eat anything you throw at it and come back for more. Just make sure your mother board supports i7 chips before you buy one.
i7 is definitely great CPU but the right question is what you need it for. If you are looking to build gaming rig go with Dual or Quad if this is not the case and you are planning to do something “serious” (programming, video/photo editing, heavy multitasking, 3D Studio, CAD…) than i7 is best choice when budget allows it.
The i7 and its 8 logical threads is a great CPU, I got it for virtualizing and it doesn't dissapoint. However, neither did the Q9450 that I upgraded it from. Thanks Intel.
You are about to answer a thread that has been inactive for more than 6 months. If you still wish to proceed, please ensure that your posting is original and does not duplicate or overlap any prior responses to this thread.