So even though the 55nm version is better in all respects, it's only $5 more expensive than the 65nm version? And reading those reviews, looks likes some poor saps recently bought the 65nm version. I thought the new 55nm process was supposed to bring prices down.
So even though the 55nm version is better in all respects, it's only $5 more expensive than the 65nm version? And reading those reviews, looks likes some poor saps recently bought the 65nm version. I thought the new 55nm process was supposed to bring prices down.
They want people to buy the old ones first! that and nvidia and the companies want that bigger margin etc as well - 55nm will be cheaper to product, charge the same price but receive higher profits etc.
They want people to buy the old ones first! that and nvidia and the companies want that bigger margin etc as well - 55nm will be cheaper to product, charge the same price but receive higher profits etc.
or until ATI comes along with there ace and puts a smack to NVIDIA price/performance! makin Nvidia lowering prices for 55mn
or until ATI comes along with there ace and puts a smack to NVIDIA price/performance! makin Nvidia lowering prices for 55mn
Haha ATi has been on the ball lately thank god! Im kinda glad too that Red Alert 3 actually runs better on the red teams cards even if there a letter card (spec wise) - ATi/AMD need that $$$ etc
Haha ATi has been on the ball lately thank god! Im kinda glad too that Red Alert 3 actually runs better on the red teams cards even if there a letter card (spec wise) - ATi/AMD need that $$$ etc
My next card might just be ATi
in a very real sense they have got there mojo back! They now have a routine such as die shrink and beef up card cycle that which proven in the 2xxx die strink 3xxx beef up 4xxx. They definitly had vision
You are about to answer a thread that has been inactive for more than 6 months. If you still wish to proceed, please ensure that your posting is original and does not duplicate or overlap any prior responses to this thread.