I am planning to buy the new Mac Pro.
But the question is:
better the single processor with 4 core and 2,93ghz or the 2 processors with 8 core and 2,26ghz? The price is pretty equivalent at the end... but which solution is best performant?
Um what do you plan to do? More cores would be better for rendering apps that use more cores but if the apps only utilize 4 cores then the newer Nehalem Xeon would be better since it improves a lot.
Well the gaming would benefit (if you have 2 GPUs) from the Nehalem Xeon. But the video editing might end up benefiting from the dual CPUs but not by much since Nehalem itself has hyperthreading which gives it 8 logical cores which would be equivalent to 2 CPUs.
Overall I would say go with the 2.93GHz Nehalem Xeon because it will act as 8 cores and perform on par with the dual CPU system.
Actually, both setups have a Nehalem - the choice is between a single Nehalem with 4 cores, 8 threads at 2.93, or the dual nehalems with 8 cores and 16 threads at 2.26. Honestly, the video editing and dvd creation would be faster on the dual processor setup, but the gaming would be faster with the single CPU, so chose based on which you do more.
------------------------------Asus P6T deluxe
i7 965 @ 4.2GHz (200*21), 1.384V
12GB Corsair Dominator DDR3-1600 CAS 7
Reply to cjl
How in the hell would you even be able to fit 2 quad cores into a laptop since Intel just barely released the Yorkfield based quads to laptops a bit ago......
How in the hell would you even be able to fit 2 quad cores into a laptop since Intel just barely released the Yorkfield based quads to laptops a bit ago......
LOL!
Somehow I don't think Zippy knows much about Macs or Intel...
Message edited by fazers_on_stun on 03-07-2009 at 06:19:26 PM