Tom's Hardware > Forum > CPU & Components > CPUs > The new Mac Pro with Nehalem Xeon
Word :    Username :           
 

I am planning to buy the new Mac Pro.
But the question is:
better the single processor with 4 core and 2,93ghz or the 2 processors with 8 core and 2,26ghz? The price is pretty equivalent at the end... but which solution is best performant?

Sponsored Links
Register or log in to remove.

Um what do you plan to do? More cores would be better for rendering apps that use more cores but if the apps only utilize 4 cores then the newer Nehalem Xeon would be better since it improves a lot.

------------------------------ http://www.steamcalculator.com/76561197970703804/camo_sig.png
Reply to jimmysmitty

@ jimmysmitty:

well, I am planning to use it for video editing with final cut, dvd creation and some gaming (under windows environment).

Reply to supergisk

Well the gaming would benefit (if you have 2 GPUs) from the Nehalem Xeon. But the video editing might end up benefiting from the dual CPUs but not by much since Nehalem itself has hyperthreading which gives it 8 logical cores which would be equivalent to 2 CPUs.

Overall I would say go with the 2.93GHz Nehalem Xeon because it will act as 8 cores and perform on par with the dual CPU system.

------------------------------ http://www.steamcalculator.com/76561197970703804/camo_sig.png
Reply to jimmysmitty
- 0 +

Actually, both setups have a Nehalem - the choice is between a single Nehalem with 4 cores, 8 threads at 2.93, or the dual nehalems with 8 cores and 16 threads at 2.26. Honestly, the video editing and dvd creation would be faster on the dual processor setup, but the gaming would be faster with the single CPU, so chose based on which you do more.

------------------------------ Asus P6T deluxe
i7 965 @ 4.2GHz (200*21), 1.384V
12GB Corsair Dominator DDR3-1600 CAS 7
Reply to cjl

@ jimmysmitty and cjl:

thank you guys! understood...

Reply to supergisk
- 0 +

zipzoomflyhigh wrote :

I read that the i7 laptops have less than 1 hour battery life. Pretty useless if you ask me. So what would you get with 2 i7's? 20 minutes?

 

Laptops?

 

This is a Mac Pro.

 

It's a desktop, designed as a fairly powerful workstation.


Message edited by cjl on 03-08-2009 at 09:46:47 AM
------------------------------ Asus P6T deluxe
i7 965 @ 4.2GHz (200*21), 1.384V
12GB Corsair Dominator DDR3-1600 CAS 7
Reply to cjl

How in the hell would you even be able to fit 2 quad cores into a laptop since Intel just barely released the Yorkfield based quads to laptops a bit ago......

------------------------------ http://www.steamcalculator.com/76561197970703804/camo_sig.png
Reply to jimmysmitty

jimmysmitty wrote :

How in the hell would you even be able to fit 2 quad cores into a laptop since Intel just barely released the Yorkfield based quads to laptops a bit ago......



LOL!

Somehow I don't think Zippy knows much about Macs or Intel...


Message edited by fazers_on_stun on 03-07-2009 at 06:19:26 PM
Reply to fazers_on_stun

you have to make the two quads quantum size; about the size of Alice when she entered the rabbit hole

Reply to cantubury
Tom's Hardware > Forum > CPU & Components > CPUs > The new Mac Pro with Nehalem Xeon
Go to:

There are 1200 identified and unidentified users. To see the list of identified users, Click here.

Sponsored links
  • Ask the community now
  • Publish
Ad
They won a badge
Join us in greeting them