Tom's Hardware > Forum > Graphic & Displays > Graphics Cards > Bit tech Quad SLI 295 GTX

Bit tech Quad SLI 295 GTX

Forum Graphic & Displays : Graphics Cards - Bit tech Quad SLI 295 GTX

Tom's Hardware: Over 1.4 million members in 6 different countries available to answer all your high-tech questions. Sign up now! Its free!
Word :    Username :           
 
Sponsored Links
Register or log in to remove.

Great find Liquid, nice in depth review... are you thinking about Quad SLI again... ? I know you didn't enjoy your last quad SLI experience....

------------------------------ Core i7 920 @ 4.0Ghz - Gigabyte UD5 - 12GB Corsair XMS 3 - 2X ATI 58701GB Crossfire- Zalman 850W - X-FI Fatality Gamer Pro - Xigmatek Thor's Hammer - Raptor X 150 - WD Black 1TB OCZ Vertex Turbo 120 GB SSD - Cosmos S Case w/side window + 8X 120mm fans
Reply to annisman

never again my man, bad min frame rates u'll see even in this review and un predictable frames, reg sli for me and max 3 gpus. :P waitin fir 300 seires or hd5000s

sorry on psp lol cant type


Message edited by L1qu1d on 01-10-2009 at 05:11:09 AM
------------------------------ PSN: L1qu1dat1on
Steam: Darkerliquid
XBL: L1qu1dat1on
http://valid.canardpc.com/cache/banner/861526.png
Reply to L1qu1d

Hey L1qu1d, just out of curiosity, do many games utilize Tri-SLI (effectively)? I know last time I had SLI it worked awesome with two cards in recent games.

------------------------------ New Build : Intel Core i5 750 > Gigabyte GA-P55-UD4P > 2x2GB GSkill 1600MHz CL7 1.65V > Samsung Spinpoint F3 1TB >
Antec 300 Illusion > Asus 4850 512MB w/AM Cooler > Corsair 650HX > CM Hyper 212 Plus > Other: PII 940/Gigabyte 790GX/4850 1G
Reply to EXT64

Uh, did you notice something... that I did?

In DX10 the HD 4870's performance goes UP when moving from DX9 to DX10 HQ @ 2560x1600 with and without 2XAA, the GTX cards go down;

http://www.bit-tech.net/hardware/2 [...] -review/11

http://www.bit-tech.net/hardware/2 [...] -review/10

They then go down from there when going up to VHQ;
http://www.bit-tech.net/hardware/2 [...] i-review/9

Finally a good DX10 performance boost. :sol: Can't really tell if the IQ is improved over the DX9 though just from the quicky review.

Now for Stalker in DX10.1 ;)


Message edited by TheGreatGrapeApe on 01-10-2009 at 05:32:11 AM
------------------------------ You need a license to buy a gun, but they'll sell anyone a stamp (or internet account) - RED GREEN. GA to SK
HD Freedom: 45 5F E1 04 22 CA 29 C4 93 3F 95 05 2B 79 2A B2

Reply to TheGreatGrapeApe

If it weren't for Nvidia's raw power, it would have a major disadvantage when dealing with the ATI innovation. Its like comparing a smart average build guy (ATI) with a dumb Strong jock (Nvidia). (This isn't a Jock stereotype its just an example don't take it personal all you jocks on these forums LOL!:P)

Now Mr EXT64:

Dual cards are a god blessing. When it comes to 3 cards, they scale better than 4...and seeing some results 4s can show some decent scales.

What I noticed the higher the resolution the more the cards actually scale and start pulling their own weight. But as an example I'm on my 1680x1050 monitor now, and I get around 400 fps in devil may Cry 4, when I disable tri sli I get around 250-300 fps. So I think its a pretty decent scale:)

Games like Half life 2 (which honestly need only 1 card mostly) the game doesn't scale with tri 2 well. I kno that when I had quad I would drop down to 20 fps in CSS.

Crysis uses tri sli amazingly, unlike Crysis Warhead which only benefits from 2 of my cards for some reason.

Games that use it effectively in my opinion:

COD4+5
Devil May Cry 4
Crysis
Bioshock
Far Cry 2
world in conflict (Most of the time)
Brothers in arms

There are others that don't come to mind. But the ones that don't scale with tri sli, mostly scale when I hit 1920x1200 or higher.

I'm surprised that the 280 GTXs are doing soo well. In sli they outshine even the quad sli cards...I wonder what tri sli could do to the competition:P

Kinda mad that none of the cards are using the latest drivers except the 295 GTX....


Message edited by L1qu1d on 01-10-2009 at 01:09:56 PM
------------------------------ PSN: L1qu1dat1on
Steam: Darkerliquid
XBL: L1qu1dat1on
http://valid.canardpc.com/cache/banner/861526.png
Reply to L1qu1d

thanks for the link.
Found something interesting about Crysis,this game loves Nvidia cards but when the resolution goes over 1920x1200,the ATI cards take the lead.
Again in some games the Nvidia has the lead but in some other games especially when AA and AF is enabled,4870X2 takes the lead,however Catalyst 9.1 seems to improve the performance a bit.

and btw L1QU1D,the reason that 2 GTX 280s sometime beat dual GTX 295 in QuadSLI is mostly because of the driver,both Nvidia and ATI has to work more on drivers for QuadSLI and CrossFire X.

The review mention this too.


Message edited by Maziar on 01-10-2009 at 02:02:27 PM
Reply to Maziar

yup thats why I don't deal with quads anymore. By the tie they get them working the way its supposed to it just loses all interest.

And ATI takes lead only @ 2560x1600 and the game is unplayable in Crysis at parts:) And remember its only the quad Crossfire.

If you look at the results it was mainly in fallout 3 and Crysis with AA 2560x1600. the rest of them was mostly Nvidia cards :)

Take a quick look at the review again.

And I just wanted to add that its now 6 months for the 4870 X2 and quad fire still isn't what the 9800 GX2 was after 6 months....so I'm pretty angry bout that.

Remember this is comparing a complete setup against an incomplete 280s setup and 260s setup etc. I would love to see tri sli put to the test against these cards, then we'll see what resolutions can do:)

If you recall the Guru3D Intel i7 review, 280s tri came out ontop using the old drivers, with these drivers, on ATI and Nvidia, both card companies made some leaps and we need updated benchmarks.

Message quoted 2 times
Message edited by L1qu1d on 01-10-2009 at 02:18:06 PM
------------------------------ PSN: L1qu1dat1on
Steam: Darkerliquid
XBL: L1qu1dat1on
http://valid.canardpc.com/cache/banner/861526.png
Reply to L1qu1d

You mentioned the ATI HD5000 Series when you thinging that'll be out?? anytime soon theres minor rumors floating around but nothing with substance....

Reply to OmegaStalker

Most ppl here play games in 1680x1050 or 1900x1200, nvidia seem to perform well at those RES. Even my "old" 9800gtx+ perform well at this res.

But i think its still proving that nvidia didnt acheived what the wanted .....


Message edited by boulard83 on 01-10-2009 at 03:33:41 PM
------------------------------ __________________________Le Québécois_________________________
WCed Q9550 EO + P5Q @ 3.825ghz / HTPC - E5200 + P5Q @ 3.3ghz
BFG GTX285 OC2 + PC P&C 750w . / HIS HD4850 with Sharp 42" 1080p
Reply to boulard83

well if you look at the benchmarks they exchange blows even at 2560x1600...soooo really it aint a win for either.

------------------------------ PSN: L1qu1dat1on
Steam: Darkerliquid
XBL: L1qu1dat1on
http://valid.canardpc.com/cache/banner/861526.png
Reply to L1qu1d

Yup, the Min FPS is pretty bad ... in some case in HIGH res HIGH setting.

What about your TRI-Sli L1qu1d ???

------------------------------ __________________________Le Québécois_________________________
WCed Q9550 EO + P5Q @ 3.825ghz / HTPC - E5200 + P5Q @ 3.3ghz
BFG GTX285 OC2 + PC P&C 750w . / HIS HD4850 with Sharp 42" 1080p
Reply to boulard83

Yeah, it sounds like the only problem with tri-SLI 280's is that no game needs that much power. Still, its good to hear that Tri-SLI works well. You'll be in really good shape if games start using physics seriously, since you can put one on physics and two on graphics.

------------------------------ New Build : Intel Core i5 750 > Gigabyte GA-P55-UD4P > 2x2GB GSkill 1600MHz CL7 1.65V > Samsung Spinpoint F3 1TB >
Antec 300 Illusion > Asus 4850 512MB w/AM Cooler > Corsair 650HX > CM Hyper 212 Plus > Other: PII 940/Gigabyte 790GX/4850 1G
Reply to EXT64

L1qu1d wrote :

yup thats why I don't deal with quads anymore. By the tie they get them working the way its supposed to it just loses all interest.

And ATI takes lead only @ 2560x1600 and the game is unplayable in Crysis at parts:) And remember its only the quad Crossfire.

If you look at the results it was mainly in fallout 3 and Crysis with AA 2560x1600. the rest of them was mostly Nvidia cards :)

Take a quick look at the review again.

And I just wanted to add that its now 6 months for the 4870 X2 and quad fire still isn't what the 9800 GX2 was after 6 months....so I'm pretty angry bout that.

Remember this is comparing a complete setup against an incomplete 280s setup and 260s setup etc. I would love to see tri sli put to the test against these cards, then we'll see what resolutions can do:)

If you recall the Guru3D Intel i7 review, 280s tri came out ontop using the old drivers, with these drivers, on ATI and Nvidia, both card companies made some leaps and we need updated benchmarks.



I read it completely :D yeah in most games the GTX 295 takes the lead :) but in some other games the HD 4870 X2 takes the lead but hopefully better drivers will improve the performance.

Reply to Maziar

L1qu1d wrote :

yup thats why I don't deal with quads anymore. By the tie they get them working the way its supposed to it just loses all interest.




i thought it was more like GPU-cide. nvidia driver-murdering their 2 previous gx2's after their replacements had come.

but i have to say this one is more in-depth than the one @ g3d

Reply to wh3resmycar

The tri-280s work great, its just for any1 that actually paid for them (I traded my 2 9800 GX2s with my friend:P, he doesn't need a gaming rig) its pointless up till now. I mainly game with 1 280 GTX since theres no point in pushing more heat in the case pointlessly.

I don't have any min frame rate problems at all with the Tri setup, although there are a handful of games that lower in AVG frames but increase in min frames when tri is enabled. Thats easily fixed by going into regular sli. A good example would be the sh!ty Nfs Undercover game:P

Either way I'll say this again, this card fails to surprise and catch my eye. WAIT for the 5000s and the 300s ppl don't go Quad serioulsy alot more head aches than there should be, I went through it. Most games use 3 GPUs (ie Crysis). Unless you get an X2 card and then wait for the X2 to go down in price:D.

I would say that the ATI 4870 X2 being about 100$ cheaper (150$ at some stores) its still the best buy.

------------------------------ PSN: L1qu1dat1on
Steam: Darkerliquid
XBL: L1qu1dat1on
http://valid.canardpc.com/cache/banner/861526.png
Reply to L1qu1d
Tom's Hardware > Forum > Graphic & Displays > Graphics Cards > Bit tech Quad SLI 295 GTX
Go to:

There are 1156 identified and unidentified users. To see the list of identified users, Click here.

Please mind

You are about to answer a thread that has been inactive for more than 6 months.
If you still wish to proceed, please ensure that your posting is original and does not duplicate or overlap any prior responses to this thread.

Add a reply Cancel
Sponsored links
  • Ask the community now
  • Publish
Ad
They won a badge
Join us in greeting them