If i were you i would drop the sound card. If all you're doing is gaming (and you don't intend to play GTA 4 ) then get a e8400,e8500 or e8600..
other than that, it looks good unless you want to spend the saved money from the sound card on a 4850X2 now. that would allow you to buy another 4850 or another 4850X2 in the future. which is not possible with the GTX 260
Hey, good luck building and everything looks good. The Gskill recommended above will probably be sufficient...you really wont notice the difference...I might go with the 1066 though...everything else looks good though
I am curious about your reasoning for the soundcard. On some threads people talk very highly of them for gaming. If you dont mind, could you explain?
Yea I'm just gaming but I hear quad core is the way of the future! What do you think?
Oh and the videocard, I felt like a 4870x2 might be a bit overboard for 1600 X1050, but tahts just me. THough I dont see myself playing crysis, I want to max out company of heroes, fary cry 2, witcher, the good stuff without dipping in fps.
As always, I am interested in your opinions!
Message edited by antikaratekid on 12-18-2008 at 04:58:37 AM
Hey, good luck building and everything looks good. The Gskill recommended above will probably be sufficient...you really wont notice the difference...I might go with the 1066 though...everything else looks good though
Would you recommend a sound card?
Message edited by antikaratekid on 12-18-2008 at 05:05:42 AM
Basically you want to run your FSB(cpu speed):RAM ratio 1:1, it's shown to produce the best performance. Since you won't be overclocking your CPU enough (on air) to get 1:1 fsb:ram ratio with 1066 ram, then getting 1066 ram is a waste.
Message edited by Liderc on 12-18-2008 at 05:12:14 AM
I would say save the few bucks on the sound card and maybe use it to upgrade your cpu. The onboard sound now is very good. I do not hear any difference in that verus a dedicated sound card. Everyone's hearing is different though...
all and all this is a pretty solid build. Seems to look good to me.
sorry i meant to say *will not* bottleneck your cpu.
If its strickly for gaming i'd say go with the dual core. If you plan on doing multitasking i'd stick with the q6600. Both overclock fairly well. Programs are starting to use quard core technology more and more as time passes. It has not yet hit the gaming market yet but I think it will in the near future. Both are very good cpus though. Personaly like I noted earlier i'd drop the sound card and pick up the q9550 or q9450. That would be a major improvment in preformance over your q6600.
You are about to answer a thread that has been inactive for more than 6 months. If you still wish to proceed, please ensure that your posting is original and does not duplicate or overlap any prior responses to this thread.