omen727

Distinguished
Mar 10, 2009
5
0
18,510
I have a MSI K9A2-CF mother board with the 790X chipset. I was going to upgrade my processor to a AMD 940 then the 955 comes out at 3.2GH. AMD site seems to say I can't use the 940 or 955. MSI site seems to imply I can with BIOS upgrade. Anybody have any experience here? Don't want to waste money on a processor that won't work. I'll go with new vid. I use this machine mostly for gaming
 

flyin15sec

Distinguished
Apr 16, 2008
985
0
19,010
If you have version1 of K9A2-CF it may not work with 140W TDP processors. Version2 should work just fine, with BIOS update.

Hell, I blew up my K9A2-CF version1 with just a 5400+ dual core, running at 3.3ghz.
 

omen727

Distinguished
Mar 10, 2009
5
0
18,510
Thanks
The 955 is supposed to be 125W.
I have read some have had trouble with MSI board BIOS updates so I was curious if anyone had actually tried it.
I'm running a dual core 6000+ now with no OC. That's why I don't want to go less than 3gh.
 

RazberyBandit

Distinguished
Dec 25, 2008
2,303
0
19,960
Check this thread for more info about this motherboard: http://www.tomshardware.com/forum/256968-30-k9a2-7388

There were similar discussions there, which led me to actually calling MSI. And, you can always call MSI yourself for CPU support verification.

None of AMD's CPUs are rated higher than 125W TDP, so that 140W TDP point seems misplaced. When OC'd, 125W CPUs will approach and even surpass 140W, but that's a different story, and it's certainly not the case with his 5400+. Even if it were a Windsor, he would have had to set the voltage to 1.48V or higher to get it to surpass 125W TDP. A Brisbane would never come close.
 

dragoon190

Distinguished
Apr 25, 2009
130
0
18,680
What's the difference between K9A2 CF-F v2 and K9A2 CF?

I can't seems to find the CF-F board on msi.com, but msicomputer.com does have the CF-F board listed but not CF version...

EDIT: Speaking of which, shouldn't all AM3 CPUs be backward compatible? At least that's what the AMD website said...
 

RazberyBandit

Distinguished
Dec 25, 2008
2,303
0
19,960
The original version, v1.X, was called K9A2 CF-F. The revised version is named K9A2 CF V2. The difference with the two boards is that the v1.X board has never had support for any CPU rated at over 95W TDP until maybe a week or two ago, while the V2 board had up to 125W CPU support from it's start. As best I can tell, everything else is identical. And yes, AM3 CPUs are compatible with AM2+ socketed motherboards, as well as some AM2 socketed motherboards. (It depends on BIOS update support.) Still, each motherboard's ability to support CPUs of greater TDP, or wattage, than the design was originally intended to support will vary. And that's the only question remaining - Will the v1.X board support a 125W CPU? Will it also support that CPU if it's overclocked/over-volted and happens to push the TDP beyond 140W?

When I called MSI, they told me it now supported 125W CPUs, but had no information regarding the overclocking of such CPUs.

Something else to take note of is there's a similar 790X motherboard from Gigabyte and it has the SB750 southbridge, whereas both MSI versions have the SB600. Gigabyte's board also has an 8-pin power connector, while our MSI boards have a 4-pin.