aylafan

Distinguished
Feb 24, 2006
540
1
19,165


ummm.... I think you misread the topic. He's not comparing an Intel Q9650... he even mentioned that it was a Phenom 9650 Quad-core which is an AMD processor.. The AMD Phenom 9650 is about $120.

Now back to the topic, the Q6600 (2.4Ghz) is still faster than the AMD Phenom 9650 (2.3Ghz). The Q6600 has more clock cycles per second, but the Phenom 9650 is $70 cheaper. It depends if you want to save money or have more performance.

But if I were to go the AMD route for $195. I would get the AMD Phenom II X4 920 2.8GHz Quad-core Processor.
 


:ouch: :pfff: :sweat: :eek:
Am extremely sorry dude...my bad... :D

The Q6600 is a better performing CPU :D

Its oly comparable with the newer P II ...the older Phenoms dont have comparable performance with the Q6600...
 

doomsdaydave11

Distinguished
Oct 16, 2007
935
0
18,980
The Phenom II X4's are terrific. For $195 you get some pretty impressive performance. Hard to not recommend, especially paired with AMD's great 790- chipsets.

The Q6600 will always beat the P9650. No contest here. Also, the Q6600 should not be bought anymore. There are other, better options for cheaper prices. Last I looked the Q6600 was back up to $200.
 

aylafan

Distinguished
Feb 24, 2006
540
1
19,165


+1 doomsdaydave11

The Q6600 ($200) is an old processor, you shouldn't buy it anymore. If you want an Intel processor that is newer, built on a better manufacturing process, have a larger FSB at 1333Mhz, have similar performance, and costs as much as the Q6600 without overclocking. Get the Intel Core 2 Quad Q8300 2.5GHz 4MB L2 Cache LGA 775 95W Quad-Core Processor for $189.
 

mi1ez

Splendid
I think I'm with gkay, the x3 looks like a very promising product at it's price point. to answer the original question...

Q6600 or phenom 9650? if limited to those 2 chips, Q6600. newer better products are out there for similar prices though...