I'm hoping I might find a beta tester for this unreleased game, also experienced PC tech to answer this, but if not, anyone please give your opinion.
System:
i7 920 OC'd 3.35ghz
P6T V2
12gb 1600mhz DDR
SB X-Fi Fatal1ty Champion
SLI 250 512mb GPU's Superclocked edition
GLFS Velociraptor 300gb
Backup drive of 500gb
Here's my question and issues:
Supposely the HLFS Velociraptor can RAID0 with the GLFS version according to people who have done it, and according to my last thread on this forum. But I read that the HLFS version is designed to RAID, while the GLFS is not. The HLFS latency is 3.0 seconds, while the GLFS is 5.5. Does that mean that if the HLFS has to access 30 files, it'll be 1 second faster?
Western Digital support replied to an email saying I should buy 2 HLFS drives if I want to RAID0 because they are designed for that, and the GLFS is not. That would mean the GLFS drive I have would be put to the side if I were to go that route. Right now I am not interested in a SSD as I hear I should give those drives more time to finalize or something. Or is that wrong?
So I'm stuck with the decision... Do I spend $200 on a HLFS and raid it with the GLFS despite WD support's recommendation NOT to do so?
Or do I spend $400 on 2 brand new HLFS drives and make use of the GLFS elsewhere?
Or is there a SSD that is stable enough that anyone would recommend. One that would be exceptionally fast. I've never had a SSD.
Or do I just save the money and eventually just upgrade the graphics cards and forget RAID0 as it wouldn't make a difference? When I say difference, I mean half a second. A big difference in my opinion is a second or more.
Supposely the maps on FFXIV are huge, and when you move from zone to zone like in FFXI, you aren't actually put into a loading screen. Instead, it just loads as you go (thats how I take it)
It is important that if having a faster drive means your game loads 1 second faster than someone elses, that puts you at a fine advantage that if utilized right, can sometimes make you or break you.
Thanks in advance!
System:
i7 920 OC'd 3.35ghz
P6T V2
12gb 1600mhz DDR
SB X-Fi Fatal1ty Champion
SLI 250 512mb GPU's Superclocked edition
GLFS Velociraptor 300gb
Backup drive of 500gb
Here's my question and issues:
Supposely the HLFS Velociraptor can RAID0 with the GLFS version according to people who have done it, and according to my last thread on this forum. But I read that the HLFS version is designed to RAID, while the GLFS is not. The HLFS latency is 3.0 seconds, while the GLFS is 5.5. Does that mean that if the HLFS has to access 30 files, it'll be 1 second faster?
Western Digital support replied to an email saying I should buy 2 HLFS drives if I want to RAID0 because they are designed for that, and the GLFS is not. That would mean the GLFS drive I have would be put to the side if I were to go that route. Right now I am not interested in a SSD as I hear I should give those drives more time to finalize or something. Or is that wrong?
So I'm stuck with the decision... Do I spend $200 on a HLFS and raid it with the GLFS despite WD support's recommendation NOT to do so?
Or do I spend $400 on 2 brand new HLFS drives and make use of the GLFS elsewhere?
Or is there a SSD that is stable enough that anyone would recommend. One that would be exceptionally fast. I've never had a SSD.
Or do I just save the money and eventually just upgrade the graphics cards and forget RAID0 as it wouldn't make a difference? When I say difference, I mean half a second. A big difference in my opinion is a second or more.
Supposely the maps on FFXIV are huge, and when you move from zone to zone like in FFXI, you aren't actually put into a loading screen. Instead, it just loads as you go (thats how I take it)
It is important that if having a faster drive means your game loads 1 second faster than someone elses, that puts you at a fine advantage that if utilized right, can sometimes make you or break you.
Thanks in advance!