Sign in with
Sign up | Sign in
Your question

Graphics Card: Memory Amount vs. Speed

Last response: in Graphics & Displays
Share
Anonymous
January 17, 2009 5:30:23 PM

Given that the processor speed is the SAME for two cards
And given that goal is for still photography work using photoshop, what is more useful on a video card:

(Processor speed being the same) :

On-board memory's:
a) clock speed or
b) amount of memory?

Between these two affordable cards:
A. GeForce 9500 GT 512MB http://www.newegg.com/Product/Prod [...] 6814130378 -or-
B. GeForce 9500 GT 1GB http://www.newegg.com/Product/Prod [...] 6814130395

Remember, its for 2D photoshop work - but I run a LOT of files in a years ...my meat n potatoes lol
a c 191 U Graphics card
a b } Memory
January 17, 2009 6:51:21 PM

Neither would be a problem for 2D work but...
This is obviously a business situation from your post, so I would suggest you check out the forums on Photoshop or even call the software vendors themselves for professional help.
Anonymous
January 17, 2009 7:07:24 PM

which card would you buy and why?
Related resources
a c 191 U Graphics card
a b } Memory
January 17, 2009 7:16:45 PM

Without seeking professional help, I`d go for the bigger memory.
But again, I`d strongly advise you to seek help elsewhere if this is a business system.
January 19, 2009 9:10:00 AM

Are u guys kidding ? The 9500gt will run out of steam way before it hits the memory wall . I simply can't imagine a 9500gt doing 2560×1600 with AA x2 . No point investing in a card with more memory if its not going to use it. I vote faster memory and clock it higher for more performance.
a b U Graphics card
January 19, 2009 11:24:32 AM

Clocks first; even a low mem card with high clocks can compete, but theres no purpose for extra RAM if the card isn't powerful enough to use it all.

The extra RAM is for storing textures, which only comes into play at higher resolutions. Thats why a 1GB 4870 isn't that much better than a 512MB 4870 until you hit 1920x1200 and above.
Anonymous
January 19, 2009 2:22:23 PM

Recommend an Nvidia-based card for me. I can spend about $130 max, and I love a good Newegg special lol. I seem to remember that my monitor calibration software was happier w/Nvidia chipset, but perhaps that has changed...

I do see the Sapphire for $94 with code from Newegg email special:
http://www.newegg.com/Product/Product.aspx?Item=N82E168...

How is that one? Its "SAPPHIRE 100265L Radeon HD 4830 512MB 256-bit GDDR3 PCI Express 2.0 x16 HDCP Ready CrossFire Supported"
a b U Graphics card
January 19, 2009 2:32:08 PM

If you HAVE to have nvidia, for that price, look at the 9800gt. Performance about the same of the 4830, price should be in the same ballpark too. If you want to spend less, consider the 9600gt, I have one of those, and it's not bad either. Not as good as the 9800gt, but still does pretty well.
Anonymous
January 19, 2009 10:03:43 PM

If I try Radeon, and see if Monaco Optix will calibrate the monitor that I make a living on, I might try this Sapphire-Radeon.

How do these specs look? Does it have a separate power connector? Thats okay - I have good PSU with power for a card.

Im narrowing down my choices, and this one stands out. Please read the specs and give it a thumbs up or down.

THANKS! Buying my E8500 and video card tonight so its decision time!

Brand SAPPHIRE
Model 100265L
Interface
Interface PCI Express 2.0 x16
Chipset
Chipset Manufacturer ATI
GPU Radeon HD 4830
Core clock 575MHz
Stream Processors 640 Stream Processing Units
Memory
Memory Clock 1800MHz
Memory Size 512MB
Memory Interface 256-bit
Memory Type GDDR3
3D API
DirectX DirectX 10.1
OpenGL OpenGL 2.1
Ports
HDMI 1 via Adapter
DVI 2
TV-Out HDTV / S-Video Out
General
RAMDAC 400 MHz
Max Resolution 2560 x 1600
Anonymous
January 19, 2009 11:44:31 PM

Quote:
Someone is doing some shopping!


tell me about it! lol Im definitely going to stimulate Newegg's economy lolo
a b U Graphics card
January 20, 2009 1:16:04 AM

Between a 9800gt and a 4830, get the cheapest one, as they should be very comparable performance wise.
!