The article is from 2003 when CPU's where open without IHSF and there was risk of shorting something when using conductive paste inproperly or too much.
LOL....... I've used that word a thousand times and this is the first time I ever had to write it. I thought it might be wrong when I did it............ LOL
LOL....... I've used that word a thousand times and this is the first time I ever had to write it. I thought it might be wrong when I did it............ LOL
Ok, and now explain to us why you are quoting from an article from 2003... Unless you are trying to be the antithesis to thunderman and enigma?
First of all I never seen it before. Secondly, I doubt many people here have and I really doubt that most people would believe that substituting your own paste, that kept temperatures lower, would invalidate a warranty. How much you want to make a bet that what was then, is now ?
The logic is simple. There won't be any software on the market for approximately 3-5 years that will push a Phenom II beyond its limitations. Therefore, what's the point of wasting $800 or even $60 on an over priced Intel chip?
The prices are right there and I even link to them.
All these chips play the games just as well as the others. But only ONE does it for less money!
DO THE MATH!!
Intel ignores their customers by continuing to produce chips that cost their customers the most money.
AMD does the opposite. The proof is in the pricing!
When comparing the price/performance ratio between Intel's offering and AMD's offering, AMD beats Intel.
AMD saves their customers money. And that's what counts the most.
AMD chooses not to produce a faster chip then Intel does and for good reason. A faster chip is more expensive and does not sell in large quantities because people cannot afford it. Especially in today's economy. That translates into lower sales. The company ends up taking a bigger loss then if it produced
a more economical product. Do you think this is why the Deneb (3.0Ghz) is currently sold out on Tigerdirect and the Core i7's are still available? THINK ABOUT IT.
Here is the line that gets you out of the problem.
"No thermal grease is recommended for anything other than temporary evaluation purposes."
How will they know?
And what does the above rant on the cost of Intel processors have to do with thermal grease?
First of all I never seen it before. Secondly, I doubt many people here have and I really doubt that most people would believe that substituting your own paste, that kept temperatures lower, would invalidate a warranty. How much you want to make a bet that what was then, is now ?
Dude, both Intel and AMD did it. Back in 2003 thermal paste was much more CONDUCTIVE than even the conductive crap we have now. If the thermal paste dripped off the top in ANY way the CPU was almost certainly dead. There was a good reason, that is all we are saying.
The logic is simple. There won't be any software on the market for approximately 3-5 years that will push a Phenom II beyond its limitations. Therefore, what's the point of wasting $800 or even $60 on an over priced Intel chip?
The prices are right there and I even link to them.
All these chips play the games just as well as the others. But only ONE does it for less money!
DO THE MATH!!
Intel ignores their customers by continuing to produce chips that cost their customers the most money.
AMD does the opposite. The proof is in the pricing!
When comparing the price/performance ratio between Intel's offering and AMD's offering, AMD beats Intel.
AMD saves their customers money. And that's what counts the most.
AMD chooses not to produce a faster chip then Intel does and for good reason. A faster chip is more expensive and does not sell in large quantities because people cannot afford it. Especially in today's economy. That translates into lower sales. The company ends up taking a bigger loss then if it produced
a more economical product. Do you think this is why the Deneb (3.0Ghz) is currently sold out on Tigerdirect and the Core i7's are still available? THINK ABOUT IT.
------------------------------I went drifting, thru the capitols of tin, where men cant walk and cant freely talk, and sons turn their fathers in
Reply to jaydeejohn
------------------------------Intel will not take the top spot, or probably the top 3 spot back for the forseeable future. Not even with 32nm and more cores will intel be able to beat Jaguar. - JennyH the AMDiot, Nov 2009
Reply to yomamafor1
You are about to answer a thread that has been inactive for more than 6 months. If you still wish to proceed, please ensure that your posting is original and does not duplicate or overlap any prior responses to this thread.