Tom's Hardware > Forum > General Networking > WAN/LAN > Can a cheap switch damage an expensive one?

Can a cheap switch damage an expensive one?

Forum General Networking : WAN/LAN - Can a cheap switch damage an expensive one?

Tom's Hardware: Over 1.4 million members in 6 different countries available to answer all your high-tech questions. Sign up now! Its free!
Word :    Username :           
 

I was at a lan party the other day and the main host guy discovered i was using my own switch on the second night. He got annoyed and told me that it could kill or damage the big switch it was connected to.

I was just wondering if this is possible because it sounds a bit far fetched to me.
Also what are the real problems of adding a non managed switch to a managed network?

Oh and in case your wondering why I used my own switch its because I didn't have a long enough network cable to reach the main one.

Sponsored Links
Register or log in to remove.

Quote :

I was just wondering if this is possible because it sounds a bit far fetched to me.

Anything is possible, but I've never seen it happen. I've seen a few ports being killed, but the cause was not the quality of the equipment.

Quote :

Also what are the real problems of adding a non managed switch to a managed network?

You can't manage it.

Reply to GhislainG
- 0 +

GhislainG wrote :

Quote :

Also what are the real problems of adding a non managed switch to a managed network?

You can't manage it.


So they can't manage my switch
but it wouldn't really be their problem if i'm getting congestion or if I'm not firewalled would it?
I'm assuming my switch just acts the same as another computer on the network but I'd like to know if I'm wrong.
Perhaps I should have got my friend to bridge his two NICs and run a crossover from mine to his. But I still have no idea why this might be a better option if it is a better option.

Message quoted 1 times
Message edited by Sharft6 on 06-02-2009 at 03:21:08 AM
Reply to Sharft6

Sharft6 wrote :

So they can't manage my switch
but it wouldn't really be their problem if i'm getting congestion or if I'm not firewalled would it?
I'm assuming my switch just acts the same as another computer on the network but I'd like to know if I'm wrong.
Perhaps I should have got my friend to bridge his two NICs and run a crossover from mine to his. But I still have no idea why this might be a better option if it is a better option.


Was your switch merely used to extend your LAN connection (Cat 5 cable from your PC to your switch, Cat 5 cable from your switch to the backbone switch) or did you have it connected to other networks, the Internet, etc. In other words, were you using it to increase the size and complexity of the network? You first post lead me to believe that you used it only to extend your LAN connection, but your last post is very different since you are now talking about network congestion and having a firewall. You can't get congestion with a single PC and you needed a firewall only if you extended their LAN to other networks.

Reply to GhislainG
- 0 +

oh woops. No the switch was just used to connect me and my friends computer to the backbone switch (cat 6 cable and 5 port gb switch).

 

Yea i just threw congestion and firewall in there because i think a managed switch is just a normal switch with extra functionality mainly to avoid congestion and to add security or privacy.

 

ty for answering my primary question but i came up with more :D oh btw i'm not accepting the fact that the switch is not manageable as a problem unless it can cause problems being unmanaged.

Message quoted 1 times
Message edited by Sharft6 on 06-02-2009 at 05:50:32 AM
Reply to Sharft6

Sharft6 wrote :

oh woops. No the switch was just used to connect me and my friends computer to the backbone switch (cat 6 cable and 5 port gb switch).

Yea i just threw congestion and firewall in there because i think a managed switch is just a normal switch with extra functionality mainly to avoid congestion and to add security or privacy.

ty for answering my primary question but i came up with more :D oh btw i'm not accepting the fact that the switch is not manageable as a problem unless it can cause problems being unmanaged.

A managed switch offers additional functionality like VLANs, SNMP, leak all traffic to a port, etc. None of those are required on a home network, but they are very useful in a corporate environment.

Having an unmanageable switch doesn't cause problems. You used your switch as a hub, but you obviously failed at making that very clear.

Reply to GhislainG
- 0 +

GhislainG wrote :

Having an unmanageable switch doesn't cause problems. You used your switch as a hub, but you obviously failed at making that very clear.



sorry for the confusion

Reply to Sharft6

You didn't confuse me, but you did confuse the main host guy by not making it clear to him that you were using your switching hub as a hub. Next time tell him that it's just a hub.

Reply to GhislainG
Tom's Hardware > Forum > General Networking > WAN/LAN > Can a cheap switch damage an expensive one?
Go to:

There are 597 identified and unidentified users. To see the list of identified users, Click here.

Sponsored links
  • Ask the community now
  • Publish
Ad
They won a badge
Join us in greeting them