I'm curious if theres any point in buying factory overclocked video cards, such as evga's sc, and ssc models, specifically of the GTX 260, and 285, which I am looking at purchasing along with the 295, since my mb does not support sli. now why would i be looking at 3 cards that are vastly different in price. I am willing to spend more if the performance increase is in line with the added cost.
at the same time, however I dont want to have my CPU and the rest of my system holding back a card I spent extra money on, therefore effectively wasting that extra money spent.
my system is as follows:
AMD phenom 9950 be (overclocked 3 ghz) i'll probably up that once I make my upgrades and squeeze some extra performance, that may warrant a better video card as well)
4 gb corsair dominator pc1066 memory (I am adding another 4 gb ocz reaper with the video card)
750 gb seagate sata hd
MSI DKA790gx motherboard (I could run 2 radeon hd4850's which I am also considering, but currently leaning towards nvidia. why did I have to buy a crossfire motherboard... my loss I guess)
OCZ 500w 17 amp at 12v PSU.
The best looking deal for what I want seems to be this:
http://www.newegg.com/Product/Product.aspx?Item=N82E16814130434
EVGA GTX 260 core 216
Claims to be a 55nm core, is this true? never heard of that on anything other than gtx 285 and 295
576 mhz base clock
I can bundle it with the memory I want, for an extra $20 after rebate, bringing the total to $265
now theres also a SSC version of the same running at 626 mhz card for about $260
http://www.newegg.com/Product/Product.aspx?Item=N82E16814130444
Cant I just overclock the cheaper version and have double my ram for free with the same video performance?
also is the ssc version 55nm?
Im just guessing that the SSC version might have better cooling, to account for the overclocking, but they appear to be the same. sure it would be nice to have it up and running at the higher clock speed out of the box, but how hard is it to overclock? is it a bios setting, or some silly software tool like amd overdrive?
Now with the higher end cards, I am both wondering about the overclocked models of the 285 and 295, and also the price/performance ratio I will see on my system.
we have a 285 obviously running the new 55 nm core running at 648 mhz for around $350:
and an SSC version running at 702 mhz version for $410
http://www.newegg.com/Product/Product.aspx?Item=N82E16814130447
cooling looks the same, how can they charge $60 more for a simple setting? sounds like just gimmicks to me, but if the ssc and sc/oc versions have more overclocking potential then the base models, maybe they're worth it.
Now I know the 295 will be a big performance boost due to its dual gpu setup, so my question here, is how much of these advantages I will see over the 2 single gpu cards in MY system, not on the setup we all wish we had, with a core i7 965 extreme, and 12 gb ddr3 2000 memory.
I realize I may need a new PSU to run a dual GPU card, so thats something to keep in mind when deciding on a card is whether it will work with my OCZ 500w 17 amp at 12v PSU.
Thanks for any light you all can shed on the subject, I hope that together we can decide on a suitable option for me, as I simply cannot decide for the life of me. every week I debate the issue, these cards drop another $5, which is not bad, but im getting sick of the radeon hd 3300 onboard I am using, and want to play some real games.
at the same time, however I dont want to have my CPU and the rest of my system holding back a card I spent extra money on, therefore effectively wasting that extra money spent.
my system is as follows:
AMD phenom 9950 be (overclocked 3 ghz) i'll probably up that once I make my upgrades and squeeze some extra performance, that may warrant a better video card as well)
4 gb corsair dominator pc1066 memory (I am adding another 4 gb ocz reaper with the video card)
750 gb seagate sata hd
MSI DKA790gx motherboard (I could run 2 radeon hd4850's which I am also considering, but currently leaning towards nvidia. why did I have to buy a crossfire motherboard... my loss I guess)
OCZ 500w 17 amp at 12v PSU.
The best looking deal for what I want seems to be this:
http://www.newegg.com/Product/Product.aspx?Item=N82E16814130434
EVGA GTX 260 core 216
Claims to be a 55nm core, is this true? never heard of that on anything other than gtx 285 and 295
576 mhz base clock
I can bundle it with the memory I want, for an extra $20 after rebate, bringing the total to $265
now theres also a SSC version of the same running at 626 mhz card for about $260
http://www.newegg.com/Product/Product.aspx?Item=N82E16814130444
Cant I just overclock the cheaper version and have double my ram for free with the same video performance?
also is the ssc version 55nm?
Im just guessing that the SSC version might have better cooling, to account for the overclocking, but they appear to be the same. sure it would be nice to have it up and running at the higher clock speed out of the box, but how hard is it to overclock? is it a bios setting, or some silly software tool like amd overdrive?
Now with the higher end cards, I am both wondering about the overclocked models of the 285 and 295, and also the price/performance ratio I will see on my system.
we have a 285 obviously running the new 55 nm core running at 648 mhz for around $350:
and an SSC version running at 702 mhz version for $410
http://www.newegg.com/Product/Product.aspx?Item=N82E16814130447
cooling looks the same, how can they charge $60 more for a simple setting? sounds like just gimmicks to me, but if the ssc and sc/oc versions have more overclocking potential then the base models, maybe they're worth it.
Now I know the 295 will be a big performance boost due to its dual gpu setup, so my question here, is how much of these advantages I will see over the 2 single gpu cards in MY system, not on the setup we all wish we had, with a core i7 965 extreme, and 12 gb ddr3 2000 memory.
I realize I may need a new PSU to run a dual GPU card, so thats something to keep in mind when deciding on a card is whether it will work with my OCZ 500w 17 amp at 12v PSU.
Thanks for any light you all can shed on the subject, I hope that together we can decide on a suitable option for me, as I simply cannot decide for the life of me. every week I debate the issue, these cards drop another $5, which is not bad, but im getting sick of the radeon hd 3300 onboard I am using, and want to play some real games.