Sign in with
Sign up | Sign in
Your question

Intel Larrabee (GPU) information . challenge to nvidia and ati radeon

Last response: in Graphics & Displays
Share
Anonymous
a b U Graphics card
February 1, 2009 6:15:48 AM

Larrabee (GPU)

This article contains information about scheduled or expected future computer chips.
It may contain preliminary or speculative information, and may not reflect the final specification of the product.
The Larrabee GPU architecture, unveiled at the SIGGRAPH conference in August 2008.

Larrabee is the codename for a graphics processing unit (GPU) chip that Intel is developing separately from its current line of integrated graphics accelerators. Larrabee is expected to compete with GeForce and Radeon products from NVIDIA and ATI respectively. Larrabee will also compete in the GPGPU and high-performance computing markets. Intel planned to have engineering samples of Larrabee ready by the end of 2008, with a video card featuring Larrabee hitting shelves in late 2009 or early 2010.[1]
Contents
[hide]

* 1 Comparison with competing products
o 1.1 Differences with current GPUs
o 1.2 Differences with CPUs
o 1.3 Comparison with the Cell Broadband Engine
o 1.4 Comparison with Intel GMA
* 2 Preliminary performance data
* 3 See also
* 4 References
* 5 External links

[edit] Comparison with competing products
Larrabee has a fully programmable pipeline, in contrast to current generation graphics cards which are only partially programmable.

Larrabee can be considered a hybrid between a multi-core CPU and a GPU, and has similarities to both. Its coherent cache hierarchy and x86 architecture compatibility are CPU-like, while its wide SIMD vector units and texture sampling hardware are GPU-like.

As a GPU, Larrabee will support traditional rasterized 3D graphics (DirectX/OpenGL) for games. However, Larrabee's hybrid of CPU and GPU features should be suitable for general purpose GPU (GPGPU) or stream processing tasks.[1] For example, Larrabee might perform ray tracing or physics processing,[2] in real time for games or offline for scientific research as a component of a supercomputer.[3] In the high-performance computing market Intel's CPUs are in some cases being displaced by GPGPU products like NVIDIA Tesla and AMD FireStream (for example in the #2 supercomputer on the TOP500 list[4]); Larrabee is Intel's answer to GPGPU.[5]

Larrabee's early presentation has drawn some criticism from GPU competitors. At NVISION 08, several NVIDIA employees called the Siggraph paper "marketing puff" and told the press that the Larrabee architecture was "like a GPU from 2006".[6]

[edit] Differences with current GPUs

Larrabee will differ from other discrete GPUs currently on the market such as the GeForce 200 Series and the Radeon 4000 series in three major ways:

* Larrabee will use the x86 instruction set with Larrabee-specific extensions.[7]

* Larrabee will feature cache coherency across all its cores.[7]

* Larrabee will include very little specialized graphics hardware, instead performing tasks like z-buffering, clipping, and blending in software, using a tile-based rendering approach.[7] A renderer implemented in software can more easily be modified, allowing more differentiation in appearance between games or other 3D applications. Intel's SIGGRAPH 2008 paper[7] mentions order-independent transparency, irregular Z-buffering, and real-time raytracing as rendering features that can be implemented with Larrabee.

[edit] Differences with CPUs

The x86 processor cores in Larrabee will be different in several ways from the cores in current Intel CPUs such as the Core 2 Duo or Core i7:

* Larrabee's x86 cores will be based on the much simpler Pentium P54C design which is still being maintained for use in embedded applications. [8] The P54C-derived core is superscalar but does not include out-of-order execution, though it has been updated with modern features such as x86-64 support, [7] similarly to Intel Atom. In-order execution means lower performance for individual cores, but since they are smaller, more can fit on a single chip, increasing overall throughput.

* Each Larrabee core contains a 512-bit vector processing unit, able to process 16 single precision floating point numbers at a time. This is similar to but four times larger than the SSE units on most x86 processors, with additional features like scatter/gather instructions and a mask register designed to make using the vector unit easier and more efficient. Larrabee derives most of its number-crunching power from these vector units.[7]

* Larrabee includes one major fixed-function graphics hardware feature: texture sampling units. These perform trilinear and anisotropic filtering and texture decompression.[7]

* Larrabee has a 1024-bit (512-bit each way) ring bus for communication between cores and to memory.[7] This bus can be configured in two modes to support Larrabee products with 16 cores or more, or fewer than 16 cores.[9]

* Larrabee includes explicit cache control instructions to reduce cache thrashing during streaming operations which only read/write data once.[7]

* Each core supports 4-way simultaneous multithreading, with 4 copies of each processor register.[7]

Theoretically Larrabee's x86 processor cores can run existing PC software; even operating systems. However, Larrabee's video card will not include all the features of a PC-compatible motherboard, so PC operating systems and applications will not run without modifications. A different version of Larrabee might sit in motherboard CPU sockets using QuickPath[10], but Intel has not yet announced plans for this. Even if compatibility is achieved, to run efficiently software must be rewritten to use Larrabee's vector units, and not all software can put them to good use.[7]

[edit] Comparison with the Cell Broadband Engine

Larrabee's philosophy of using many small, simple cores is similar to the ideas behind the Cell processor. There are some further commonalities, such as the use of a high-bandwidth ring bus to communicate between cores.[7] However, there are many significant differences in implementation which should make programming Larrabee simpler.

* The Cell processor includes one main processor which controls many smaller processors. Additionally, the main processor can run an operating system. In contrast, all of Larrabee's cores are the same, and the Larrabee is not expected to run an OS.

* Each compute core in the Cell (SPE) has a local store, for which explicit (DMA) operations are used for all accesses to DRAM. Ordinary reads/writes to DRAM are not allowed. In Larrabee, all on-chip and off-chip memories are under automatically-managed coherent cache hierarchy, so that its cores virtually share a uniform memory space through standard load/store instructions.[7].

* Because of the cache coherency noted above, each program running in Larrabee has virtually a large linear memory just as in traditional general-purpose CPU; whereas an application for Cell should be programmed taking into consideration limited memory footprint of the local store associated with each SPE (for details see this article) but with theoretically higher bandwidth.

* Cell uses DMA for data transfer to/from on-chip local memories, which has a merit in flexibility and throughput; whereas Larrabee uses special instructions for cache manipulation (notably cache eviction hints and pre-fetch instructions), which has a merit in that it can maintain cache coherence (hence the standard memory hierarchy) while boosting performance for e.g. rendering pipelines and other stream-like computation.[7].

* Each compute core in the Cell runs only one thread at a time, in-order. A core in Larrabee runs up to four threads. Larrabee's hyperthreading helps hide latencies and compensates for lack of out-of-order execution.

[edit] Comparison with Intel GMA

Intel currently sells a line of GPUs under the Intel GMA brand. These chips are not sold separately but are integrated onto motherboards. Though the low cost and power consumption of Intel GMA chips make them suitable for small laptops and less demanding tasks, they lack the 3D graphics processing power to compete with NVIDIA and AMD/ATI for a share of the high-end gaming computer market, the HPC market, or a place in popular video game consoles. In contrast, Larrabee will be sold as a discrete GPU, separate from motherboards, and is expected to perform well enough for consideration in the next generation of video game consoles.[11]

The team working on Larrabee is separate from the Intel GMA team. The hardware is being designed by Intel's Hillsboro, Oregon design team, whose last major design was the Pentium 4. The software and drivers are being written by a newly-formed team. The 3D stack specifically is being written by developers at RAD Game Tools (including Michael Abrash).[12]

[edit] Preliminary performance data
Benchmarking results from the recent SIGGRAPH paper, showing performance as an approximate linear function of the number of processing cores.

Intel's SIGGRAPH 2008 paper describes simulations of Larrabee's projected performance.[7] Graphs show how many 1 GHz Larrabee cores are required to maintain 60 FPS at 1600x1200 resolution in several popular games. Roughly 25 cores are required for Gears of War with no antialiasing, 25 cores for F.E.A.R with 4x antialiasing, and 10 cores for Half-Life 2: Episode 2 with 4x antialiasing. It is likely that Larrabee will run faster than 1 GHz, so these numbers are conservative.[13] Another graph shows that performance on these games scales nearly linearly with the number of cores up to 32 cores. At 48 cores the performance scaling is roughly 90% of linear.

A June 2007 PC Watch article suggests that the first Larrabee chips will feature 32 x86 processor cores and come out in late 2009, fabricated on a 45 nanometer process. Chips with a few defective cores due to yield issues will be sold as a 24-core version. Later in 2010 Larrabee will be shrunk for a 32 nanometer fabrication process which will enable a 48 core version.[14]

Fudzilla has posted several short articles about Larrabee, claiming that Larrabee may have a TDP as large as 300W,[15] that Larrabee will use a 12-layer PCB and has a cooling system that "is meant to look similar to what you can find on high-end Nvidia cards today,"[16] that Larrabee will use GDDR5 memory, and that it is targeted to have 2 single-precision teraflops of computing power.
February 1, 2009 6:17:28 PM

"Roughly...25 cores for F.E.A.R. with 4x antialiasing." This is the only game I have, so its the only one that really stands out to me. I sure hope their clockspeed is > 1Ghz because a 9600GT can run FEAR @ 1600x1200 at 64FPS.

http://guru3d.com/article/ati-radeon-hd-4670-review/11

Add in that ATI and Nvidia are going to 40nm ~one year before Larrabee debuts, they'll probably have a new arch by then, which means ~double performance.

At that... Larrabee might just pull a Phenom.
February 1, 2009 6:19:28 PM

Dekasav said:
"Roughly...25 cores for F.E.A.R. with 4x antialiasing." This is the only game I have, so its the only one that really stands out to me. I sure hope their clockspeed is > 1Ghz because a 9600GT can run FEAR @ 1600x1200 at 64FPS.

http://guru3d.com/article/ati-radeon-hd-4670-review/11

Add in that ATI and Nvidia are going to 40nm ~one year before Larrabee debuts, they'll probably have a new arch by then, which means ~double performance.

At that... Larrabee might just pull a Phenom.


That would be ironic. :lol: 
!