I'm going to go with Samsung SpinPoint F3 drives. After everything I've read, they seem the best overall choice for my needs.
I'm putting three drives into a RAID-5 array for my data. Those will be the 1TB size, which has the 32MB cache. That's a simple decision for me since I can use the 1TB size there.
I'm going to have a separate drive for the OS/apps, and a separate drive for the swap. The 500GB size is plenty for each of those, but it's got the 16MB cache.
The cost difference is really negligble ($27 each). It's worth it to me to get the 1TB drives for the OS/apps drive and for the swap drive "if" it's going to make a difference in performance (even a small difference over time is worth $54 to me).
Is the 32MB cache in their 1TB drives going to be even a littler faster compared to the 16MB cache in their 500GB drives? Or is it equal/relative (16MB per 500GB)? Again, I'm not planning to ever use up nearly 500GB of space for the OS/apps or for the swap.
Thanks!
I'm putting three drives into a RAID-5 array for my data. Those will be the 1TB size, which has the 32MB cache. That's a simple decision for me since I can use the 1TB size there.
I'm going to have a separate drive for the OS/apps, and a separate drive for the swap. The 500GB size is plenty for each of those, but it's got the 16MB cache.
The cost difference is really negligble ($27 each). It's worth it to me to get the 1TB drives for the OS/apps drive and for the swap drive "if" it's going to make a difference in performance (even a small difference over time is worth $54 to me).
Is the 32MB cache in their 1TB drives going to be even a littler faster compared to the 16MB cache in their 500GB drives? Or is it equal/relative (16MB per 500GB)? Again, I'm not planning to ever use up nearly 500GB of space for the OS/apps or for the swap.
Thanks!