It seems the single core CPU has gone the way of the dodo. Dual cores are incredibly cheap, and three core CPUs and quads are becoming mainstream. I would like to see how the forum stands. I'm still a single core hold out. Used dual cores in the past, but now I've settled down with my computing needs and have been content with the classic single core CPU. I myself rock a Celeron 420 at stock clocks (1.6 measly GHz), but undervolted to 1.0 volt for max power efficiency. It will do office apps, Hulu video, and old games without issue, which is where my primary usage for my main rig lies.
For those of you who have upgraded from single to dual to tri or quad, did you notice a significant performance increase each time? Was one upgrade level more prominent then another? Finally, ever regret the upgrade because it didn't deliver the performance boost you were expecting?
For those of you who have upgraded from single to dual to tri or quad, did you notice a significant performance increase each time? Was one upgrade level more prominent then another? Finally, ever regret the upgrade because it didn't deliver the performance boost you were expecting?