Download the Tom's Hardware App from the App Store
The reference for current tech news
Yes No
Ads
Tom's Hardware > Forum > Overclocking > Graphics Cards > ,INTEL VS AMD ?????K series and BE trouble.....!

,INTEL VS AMD ?????K series and BE trouble.....!

Forum Overclocking : Graphics Cards ,INTEL VS AMD ?????K series and BE trouble.....!

Word :    Username :           
 

Hi all,
Intel launched recently its Two K series chips the Core i5-655K and Core i7 -875K both have unlocked Multiplyer stuff to attract OCers .......There Prices are respectively around $220 and $280 while AMD's flagship hexcore baby costs Phenom 1090T X6 $296 on new egg and Phenom II X4 965 Available around $200........
So which is better to buy a 1.Core i5-655 K or a Phenom II X4 965 which also sports unlocked stuff being a BE
2.Core i7 875-K or AMD Phenom 1090T X6.........?
All the above two question are asked keeping in mind HD Gaming and OCing performance i have read reviews that Intel's K series Oc's better than AMD but then are hanged on 1156 platform which has limited 16 PCI-E x16 lanes........!!
So express your views all......
Thanks........

Reply to khicharkumar
Register or log in to remove.

I don't mean to stray from the question (I'm risking being called biased here), but if you're considering up to $300 CPU's, why have you ruled out a i7 930/920? I'd say if you're shooting for pure gaming performance, an X58 chipset is ideal.

Reply to redechelon

redechelon wrote :

I don't mean to stray from the question (I'm risking being called biased here), but if you're considering up to $300 CPU's, why have you ruled out a i7 930/920? I'd say if you're shooting for pure gaming performance, an X58 chipset is ideal.




I think he only considered BE and xxxk CPU's because they have unlocked multipliers which makes it a lot easier to overclock.

------------------------------ i5 750 @ 3.92GHz | ASUS Maximus III Formula | 8GB Corsair Vengeance | ASUS ENGTX480 | Corsair HX850 | and some other cool stuff
Reply to cromedome

Anything over 3.6-3.8 Ghz for gaming gives you very diminished returns so the "K" series doesn't matter in that regard, the standard chips can reach that without breaking a sweat.
The 8K series processor sucks up a whole load of juice at 4.0 Ghz and beyond:
http://www.anandtech.com/show/3742 [...] nalysed-/8
so if your planning on OCing very high with an 875K get ready for water cooling.

If you want to get a very high OC (4.5 GHZ+) without expensive cooling you only have one choice the 655K.

Reply to RJR

For gaming only consider the AMD chips or i5 750 i7 920 & 930. The other intels are not good value.

Reply to simon12

Well, if you don't have budgetary concerns then you can't go wrong with the i7 920/930 route. You will be able to game just fine with the AMD X4 955 BE however.
I would not invest in the 1090T at $300 for gaming.
You could get a X4 955 for about $160. That would be the best bang for buck in my opinion.
People are overclocking the i5 and i7 CPU's to 4 Ghz, I'm not sure the added expense of an unlocked multi is warranted but its your cash.

Reply to buzznut

Yeah, avoiding a product simply because of it's multipliers is kinda pointless. It's a bonus for sure, but it's the difference between changing maybe 10 settings instead of 5. No bigs. That's what forums are for =] .I'd prefer a 1090T over an 875k, though.

  

[btw... DAMN Psycho, your setup is nasty. 3rd 470? 4.6 GHz? D:]


Message edited by redechelon on 06-25-2010 at 07:14:20 AM
Reply to redechelon

I don't even see why people make a big deal about the unlocked multipliers. Crank up the reference clock and overclock it like a man.

Reply to Poisoner

Thanks all for your valueble commemts :D
After 1-2 hours of hardware site research and visiting the market i think buying a AMD Phenom II x4 will be right for me either 965 or 955..........sine they are value orinted and with nice AM3 mobo i will have space for DDR 3 in dual channel and 2 PCI-e 2.0 x16 slots which will be enough for me i think a FX890 chipset will do well for me thanks all......

Reply to khicharkumar

cromedome wrote :

I think he only considered BE and xxxk CPU's because they have unlocked multipliers which makes it a lot easier to overclock.



Yeh, i meant to know weather a AMD's BE in AM3 platform is better for OCing and ultimately for HD gaming performance,
or a Intel K series(both have unlocked multiplyer's at low cost insted of i7 EE which is somewhat costly) which is limited to 1156 platform which limits the GPU capablity since if 2 GPU's are used it scales down them at 8x/8x insted of 16x/16x while in AM3 they remain operating at 16x/16x sine it has 32 PCIe lanes........
But the X58 platform in a option for persons who have upper hand in budget..........
Thnaks..

Reply to khicharkumar
Register or log in to remove.
Tom's Hardware > Forum > Overclocking > Graphics Cards > ,INTEL VS AMD ?????K series and BE trouble.....!
Go to:

There are 1486 identified and unidentified users. To see the list of identified users, Click here.

Please mind

You are about to answer a thread that has been inactive for more than 6 months.
If you still wish to proceed, please ensure that your posting is original and does not duplicate or overlap any prior responses to this thread.

Add a reply Cancel
  • Ask the community now
  • Publish
Ad
Ads
Latest best answer
Will this be a good build to overclock 2500k to 5.0GHz?
By DJDeCiBeL, 17 hours ago:

I'm the one that told him that a Silver Arrow will get to 5Ghz, so I'll take the blame...

Best offers
They won a badge
Join us in greeting them
Top experts