Tom's Hardware > Forum > Graphic & Displays > Graphics Cards > [Solved] Relationship between monitor and videocard and resolutions

[Solved] Relationship between monitor and videocard and resolutions

Forum Graphic & Displays : Graphics Cards - [Solved] Relationship between monitor and videocard and resolutions

Tom's Hardware: Over 1.4 million members in 6 different countries available to answer all your high-tech questions. Sign up now! Its free!

Best answer from Just_An_Engineer.

Word :    Username :           
 

I will try to be clear, be tolerant.

I see in the Best cards for the money articles screen resolutions included.

So does that mean my GT 8800 isn't really powerful enough to run a 22 inch monitor at accetable(you choose) resolutions or does it mean that a GTX 260 + is to much videocard for my 19 inch non-wide screen monitor. If you can supply a link or elucidate for me Thanks.

Ahumado wrote :

I will try to be clear, be tolerant.

I see in the Best cards for the money articles screen resolutions included.

So does that mean my GT 8800 isn't really powerful enough to run a 22 inch monitor at accetable(you choose) resolutions or does it mean that a GTX 260 + is to much videocard for my 19 inch non-wide screen monitor. If you can supply a link or elucidate for me Thanks.



In general a bigger screen will require a more powerful video card due the increased number of pixels being controlled and the resulting increase in graphics data to be processed. You are correct that lower end or older graphics cards may not be able to handle running newer games on larger monitors. For example, if you had say an HD4670 or a 9600GT you could probably comfortably run nearly every currently available game on resolutions up to 1280x1024 and probably some older titles at even higher resolutions. If you were to buy a 22" monitor and run a 1680x1050 resolution you would likely find that you would need to upgrade your card to achieve satisfactory framerates on newer games (older games would likely still be fine).

As for your question on the 8800GT versus the GTX260, and 8800GT is probably borderline for a 1680x1050 resolution on the newest games. It can probably still handle that resolution on 95% of the games out there, but likely will struggle with the newer stuff. Pretty much the same thing can be said for any card that is over a year old. A GTX260 should be able to comfortably handle pretty much any game at 1680x1050 (except possibly for Crysis, but that game sucks anyways) and can do most at 1920x1200 without much trouble. It would definitely be overkill on a 19" monitor.

Now, if you're trying to make a decision on whether to buy a new monitor or a new video card I'd recommend that you buy the monitor. Video card prices are much more volatile than monitor prices and you will likely see the video card prices drop substantially in a few months when the new models start to appear, whereas monitor prices likely won't change appreciably.

Sponsored Links
Register or log in to remove.
Best answer

Ahumado wrote :

I will try to be clear, be tolerant.

I see in the Best cards for the money articles screen resolutions included.

So does that mean my GT 8800 isn't really powerful enough to run a 22 inch monitor at accetable(you choose) resolutions or does it mean that a GTX 260 + is to much videocard for my 19 inch non-wide screen monitor. If you can supply a link or elucidate for me Thanks.



In general a bigger screen will require a more powerful video card due the increased number of pixels being controlled and the resulting increase in graphics data to be processed. You are correct that lower end or older graphics cards may not be able to handle running newer games on larger monitors. For example, if you had say an HD4670 or a 9600GT you could probably comfortably run nearly every currently available game on resolutions up to 1280x1024 and probably some older titles at even higher resolutions. If you were to buy a 22" monitor and run a 1680x1050 resolution you would likely find that you would need to upgrade your card to achieve satisfactory framerates on newer games (older games would likely still be fine).

As for your question on the 8800GT versus the GTX260, and 8800GT is probably borderline for a 1680x1050 resolution on the newest games. It can probably still handle that resolution on 95% of the games out there, but likely will struggle with the newer stuff. Pretty much the same thing can be said for any card that is over a year old. A GTX260 should be able to comfortably handle pretty much any game at 1680x1050 (except possibly for Crysis, but that game sucks anyways) and can do most at 1920x1200 without much trouble. It would definitely be overkill on a 19" monitor.

Now, if you're trying to make a decision on whether to buy a new monitor or a new video card I'd recommend that you buy the monitor. Video card prices are much more volatile than monitor prices and you will likely see the video card prices drop substantially in a few months when the new models start to appear, whereas monitor prices likely won't change appreciably.

Reply to Just_An_Engineer

Very thorough and Thanks for your time.

Ahumado

Reply to Ahumado

It's worth pointing out that resolution is not the only factor you should consider when gauging the effectiveness of a graphics card for you. The games you intend to play, the visual settings you like to use, and your framerate tolerance all come into play as well. JAE skillfully worded his/her post by saying "should" and "probably" instead of bluntly stating things like "The 8800 GT is not enough for 1680x1050." After all, someone might be using an 8800 GT at 1920x1200 and be happy with their 30 fps on UT3.

Just_An_Engineer wrote :

A GTX260 should be able to comfortably handle pretty much any game at 1680x1050 (except possibly for Crysis, but that game sucks anyways) and can do most at 1920x1200 without much trouble. It would definitely be overkill on a 19" monitor.



19" CRTs can do 1600x1200, which is more pixels than 1680x1050 =P

Reply to efeat

Does this concept apply to playing videos as well. I just upgraded from a 20 inch to a 24 inch monitor and I am getting screen tearing when I watch videos.

Reply to ryuken3k

efeat wrote :

It's worth pointing out that resolution is not the only factor you should consider when gauging the effectiveness of a graphics card for you. The games you intend to play, the visual settings you like to use, and your framerate tolerance all come into play as well. JAE skillfully worded his/her post by saying "should" and "probably" instead of bluntly stating things like "The 8800 GT is not enough for 1680x1050." After all, someone might be using an 8800 GT at 1920x1200 and be happy with their 30 fps on UT3.



19" CRTs can do 1600x1200, which is more pixels than 1680x1050 =P



some 19" CRT can go higher than that, mine does 2048x1536.

------------------------------ ---------------
E8400, HD4870, 8gb Corsair 6400 XMS2 DHX CL4(4-4-4-12) Gigabyte GA-X38-DS4, OCZ 64GB SSD, Antec P180, Antec Neo HE500
Reply to dtq

What? I am jealous. Mine only does 1600x1200 =(

Reply to efeat
Tom's Hardware > Forum > Graphic & Displays > Graphics Cards > [Solved] Relationship between monitor and videocard and resolutions
Go to:

There are 1171 identified and unidentified users. To see the list of identified users, Click here.

Please mind

You are about to answer a thread that has been inactive for more than 6 months.
If you still wish to proceed, please ensure that your posting is original and does not duplicate or overlap any prior responses to this thread.

Add a reply Cancel
Sponsored links
  • Ask the community now
  • Publish
Ad
They won a badge
Join us in greeting them