Tom's Hardware > Forum > Graphic & Displays > Graphics Cards > Low-Power Graphics Cards

Low-Power Graphics Cards

Forum Graphic & Displays : Graphics Cards - Low-Power Graphics Cards

Tom's Hardware: Over 1.4 million members in 6 different countries available to answer all your high-tech questions. Sign up now! Its free!
Word :    Username :           
 

Hey everyone,

When I designed my HTPC, I wasn't planning on using it for gaming, but lately that 42" plasma has been beckoning... ;)

I built my HTPC with low-power in mind, so it only has a 300W PSU, albeit a very efficient one:
SeaSonic SS-300ES 300W ATX12V Ver.2.2

I have a very low-power CPU as well:
[url=http://www.newegg.com/Product/Product.aspx?Item=N82E16819103255]AMD Athlon X2 4850e (45W)
[/url]

My hard-drive is one of those Western Digital Green cards:
Western Digital Caviar Green WD6400AACS

I also have another, 5400 RPM hard drive (just full of media, doesn't get much use while gaming), and a regular DVD burner attached.

Anyway I was wondering what kind of graphics card I could use in this setup. I have heard that the Radeon 4650/4670 are pretty low power, but I find myself extremely confused as soon as I try to start adding up Watts and Amps. Would a 4670 work in my computer? Or should I just get a 500W power supply if I want decent graphics?

Sponsored Links
Register or log in to remove.

The 4670 should be ok in that rig. Don't worry so much about wattage how many amps on the 12v+ rail does your power supply say it has? Should say on the sticker.

Reply to ohiou_grad_06

That PSU can easily handle a 4670. If the plasma is 1080p, you may want a beefier card.

Reply to theAnimal

I believe it's 17 amps on the 12V rail (that's what it says on Newegg). Could i get something stronger than the 4670 in there? If so, anyone have any suggestions?

Reply to jfischer01

I think for a power supply that weak, no. That said the 4670 shouldn't be bad. But I think if you want a better card you are looking at a PSU upgrade which can be pricey as well.

Reply to ohiou_grad_06

OK, that makes it a pretty easy call. Thanks for the good advice.

Reply to jfischer01

4670 for sure.

------------------------------ http://valid.canardpc.com/cache/banner/547515.png
Intel Xeon X3370 @3.6ghz Under Enzotech Extreme-X,EVGA GTX 285 SC, 4GB Mushkin Ascent eVCI @ 1066mhz, Gigabyte P45 UD3P
Reply to spathotan

To the op, get it and try it, I've got a 9600gt which is not much better than the 4670 and I so far am very pleased, even running at 1680x1050 resolution. I think you may be quite suprised what you can pick up for 80 bucks.


Message edited by ohiou_grad_06 on 02-07-2009 at 10:32:30 PM
Reply to ohiou_grad_06

jfischer01 wrote :

I believe it's 17 amps on the 12V rail (that's what it says on Newegg). Could i get something stronger than the 4670 in there? If so, anyone have any suggestions?



It has 2 12V rails.

Reply to theAnimal

ohiou_grad_06 wrote :

I think for a power supply that weak, no. That said the 4670 shouldn't be bad. But I think if you want a better card you are looking at a PSU upgrade which can be pricey as well.



It's actually not that weak, 288W on 12V.

Reply to theAnimal
Tom's Hardware > Forum > Graphic & Displays > Graphics Cards > Low-Power Graphics Cards
Go to:

There are 528 identified and unidentified users. To see the list of identified users, Click here.

Please mind

You are about to answer a thread that has been inactive for more than 6 months.
If you still wish to proceed, please ensure that your posting is original and does not duplicate or overlap any prior responses to this thread.

Add a reply Cancel
Sponsored links
  • Ask the community now
  • Publish
Ad
They won a badge
Join us in greeting them