Tom's Hardware > Forum > Graphic & Displays > Graphics Cards > Very low 3DMark result?

Very low 3DMark result?

Forum Graphic & Displays : Graphics Cards - Very low 3DMark result?

Tom's Hardware: Over 1.4 million members in 6 different countries available to answer all your high-tech questions. Sign up now! Its free!
Word :    Username :           
 

Isn't this result very low, or is it all right?

http://img201.imageshack.us/img201/9346/3dmarkui4.th.jpg

http://img14.imageshack.us/img14/3914/3dmark2jg3.th.jpg

Neither the CPU nor GPU are overclocked.

Sponsored Links
Register or log in to remove.

Yes.. its very low.. I get better than this with a dual core..

http://i702.photobucket.com/albums/ww29/meodowla/Untitled.jpg

Reply to meodowla

Well, but what could be the problem then?

Reply to Monco

CPU, there is no way you should get a score that low!

Reply to The_Blood_Raven

That is pretty low, maybe try overclocking that cpu, I know my 3dmark score was in the 9000's with a lowly 5200 x2 and a 9600gt.

Reply to ohiou_grad_06

The score should be higher than that, even at bone stock settings. Also, a CPU score of 1600 seems quite a bit low. Have you checked with something like CPU-Z to make sure you're running at 2.4 GHz?

Reply to cjl

http://img136.imageshack.us/img136/2630/cpuzci0.jpg

 

Core speed is wrong?? Because it says 1600 Mhz as you can see...


Message edited by Monco on 02-09-2009 at 09:25:10 AM
Reply to Monco

Well that should be speedstep. Does the multiplier jump up under load?

------------------------------ Currently Playing:
1. Eve Online
2. MW2
3. Uhm...Eve Online alt
Reply to pr2thej

Dude are you serious?? You have a 2.4Ghz proc basically. The four cores don't make much of a diff. On my system (a Pentium 5200 at 2.5Ghz) with a 4870 (which wipes the floor of the 8800) I get about 8200 score on 3Dmark06. It's normal because the card is heavily bottlenecked. When I OC to 3,6Ghz, my score jumps to 14-14.5K which is fine (no OC on card or system memory). Try OCing a bit.

------------------------------ They mostly come at night. Mostly...
http://s2.battleknight.gr/index.ph [...] f=MzU4NzE=
Reply to blashyrkh

pr2thej wrote :

Well that should be speedstep. Does the multiplier jump up under load?



Yes, during games it jumps up to 2,4 Ghz.

Quote :

Dude are you serious?? You have a 2.4Ghz proc basically. The four cores don't make much of a diff. On my system (a Pentium 5200 at 2.5Ghz) with a 4870 (which wipes the floor of the 8800) I get about 8200 score on 3Dmark06. It's normal because the card is heavily bottlenecked. When I OC to 3,6Ghz, my score jumps to 14-14.5K which is fine (no OC on card or system memory). Try OCing a bit.



But what good is Q6600 worth then? Since what you're saying is that it won't beat a regular 2,4 Ghz CPU, so what is a Q6600 worth then?

Also, worth noting, during the CPU test I'm getting like 0 fps. That doesn't seem right?

Reply to Monco

I have a problem too!

I have a phenom 9850 BE and a 3870x2 but only bout 14000 06 points :(

Reply to rescawen

Monco wrote :

Yes, during games it jumps up to 2,4 Ghz.

Quote :

Dude are you serious?? You have a 2.4Ghz proc basically. The four cores don't make much of a diff. On my system (a Pentium 5200 at 2.5Ghz) with a 4870 (which wipes the floor of the 8800) I get about 8200 score on 3Dmark06. It's normal because the card is heavily bottlenecked. When I OC to 3,6Ghz, my score jumps to 14-14.5K which is fine (no OC on card or system memory). Try OCing a bit.



But what good is Q6600 worth then? Since what you're saying is that it won't beat a regular 2,4 Ghz CPU, so what is a Q6600 worth then?

Also, worth noting, during the CPU test I'm getting like 0 fps. That doesn't seem right?



The Quad is worth every bit when used for encoding and number crunching, and always outscores a dual core at the same speed.
Your cpu score should be in the 3800 range with stock clocks, which would increase your score substantially.
There's something other than just Speedstep causing it to be so low, seems like it not running the benchmark on all four cores.
0-1 on the cpu test is normal, once you start overclocking you'll see 1-2 fps.

Message quoted 1 times
Message edited by DellUser1 on 02-09-2009 at 07:21:46 PM
------------------------------ q9650 @ 4.050 | Asus Rampage Formula | 2x2 Corsair Dominators | WD Black 640 x2
EVGA GTX260 Core216 @ 686/1479/1103 | Antec TPN 750

 

Reply to DellUser1

DellUser1 wrote :


There's something other than just Speedstep causing it to be so low, seems like it not running the benchmark on all four cores.



However, if 3dMark is giving low results, does that mean that I will be experiencing worse performances in games?

Reply to Monco

If your cpu isn't performing the way it should you'll be experiencing worse performance somewhere.

------------------------------ q9650 @ 4.050 | Asus Rampage Formula | 2x2 Corsair Dominators | WD Black 640 x2
EVGA GTX260 Core216 @ 686/1479/1103 | Antec TPN 750

 

Reply to DellUser1

Tom's Hardware > Forum > Graphic & Displays > Graphics Cards > Very low 3DMark result?
Go to:

There are 575 identified and unidentified users. To see the list of identified users, Click here.

Please mind

You are about to answer a thread that has been inactive for more than 6 months.
If you still wish to proceed, please ensure that your posting is original and does not duplicate or overlap any prior responses to this thread.

Add a reply Cancel
Sponsored links
  • Ask the community now
  • Publish
Ad
They won a badge
Join us in greeting them