After a somewhat lengthy and technical talk with b2 (banthracis) I've come here to get all my half-answered question answered properly.
I am already familiar with overclocking in general and have successfully overclocked the cpu in my computer (late at night when everyone else was asleep because they think it'll absolutely kill it if I o'c)
I do however still need to grasp some of the concepts of longevity, heat and voltages.
I originally thought (before banthracis helped me out) that o'cing on stock voltage would increase heat a bit, enough to notice and possibly be looking at, but nothing massive. After b2 told me more about it, in summary he said that the heat increase when o'cing on stock voltage is so negligible that it's not going to be ... well .. big enough to even bother thinking about.
So what sort of change in the longevity of the cpu would I be looking at if I were to find a completely stable overclock on stock voltage (benchmarks run for hours without problems, not noticeable stability issues) compared to both a higher stable overclock on a higher voltage and also compared to the the stock speed and voltage? (by cpu life I don't mean futureproofing, I mean how long will it chug on until it dies)
thanks, especially if you understood that well, since I got lost
btw, I'm talking about both stock cooling and decent budgetish aftermarket cooling like the Cooler Master Hyper 212+
I am already familiar with overclocking in general and have successfully overclocked the cpu in my computer (late at night when everyone else was asleep because they think it'll absolutely kill it if I o'c)
I do however still need to grasp some of the concepts of longevity, heat and voltages.
I originally thought (before banthracis helped me out) that o'cing on stock voltage would increase heat a bit, enough to notice and possibly be looking at, but nothing massive. After b2 told me more about it, in summary he said that the heat increase when o'cing on stock voltage is so negligible that it's not going to be ... well .. big enough to even bother thinking about.
So what sort of change in the longevity of the cpu would I be looking at if I were to find a completely stable overclock on stock voltage (benchmarks run for hours without problems, not noticeable stability issues) compared to both a higher stable overclock on a higher voltage and also compared to the the stock speed and voltage? (by cpu life I don't mean futureproofing, I mean how long will it chug on until it dies)
thanks, especially if you understood that well, since I got lost
btw, I'm talking about both stock cooling and decent budgetish aftermarket cooling like the Cooler Master Hyper 212+