cadder

Distinguished
Nov 17, 2008
1,711
1
19,865
I'm replacing my home desktop and need a little help with a few things. I don't do many things that tax the computer, except that I'm starting to run Photoshop Elements a little bit.

After reading a few articles on Tom's, I've picked out a few components to start with. I plan to OC the CPU a little, maybe a lot, just for fun.

CPU: E5200

Cooler: Arctic Cooling Freezer 7 Pro, or maybe Zalman cnps9700

RAM: Corsair TWIN2X4096-6400C5

Mobo: Gigabyte GA-EP45-UD3R

HDD: WD 500Gb-750Gb (probably supplemented with a NAS)

OS: not sure yet, XP if I end up with a leftover unused license, or Vista

DVD RW: whatever it takes


1. What about case and PSU? I have one system with an Antec 300 and I like that case. Maybe I can find it bundled w/ a PSU, but are there decent choices in cases or PSU's or bundles available for less?
I'm not too far from Fry's and MicroCenter, should I get a case there to save on shipping cost?

2. What about GPU? I read the article "best video cards" on Tom's, and was thinking about the basic card, the Sapphire Radeon HD 4650. I don't do any gaming, and probably just need a card good enough to run all of Vista's features. Should I get this card, or save money and buy something cheaper?

I don't have a hard budget, and I'll get the parts that I want or think I need, but I don't want to spend extra money for no reason. I had thought about saving some time and just buying a box from the Dell outlet. I could get a basic box, E7300, 4Gb, 500Gb, Vista for $450, the build I'm working on up above will have better components and will overclock to higher performance, but will cost a little more too. I would have the satisfaction of building it but I've built lots of computers in the past, and there is probably some aggravation that would go along with the build too.
 

groo

Distinguished
Feb 3, 2008
1,046
6
19,295
I don't know about the AC7, but the Zalman is F'N huge.

if you want to save on desk space, you could step down to microATX and a Antec minuet with a half hieght 4550. all you'd loose is some OCing. with the money you save by not buying a huge cooler, you can just get a faster stock chip and OC it less.
 
I like quie computers when Im working so

antec p182 or an antec solo if you dont mind being a bit cramped in the case . Both nice cases .

Your gfx card is pretty much spot on .

The RAM is a c5 , so probably better options .

320/640/1 terabyte hard drives have have the highest data density per platter so read and write faster .
Dont get a seagate 7200.11

WD 640 black is good , so are the samsungs

 

Akebono 98

Distinguished
Dec 5, 2008
560
0
18,980
My thoughts:

RAM: G.Skill Pi Black DDR2-800 at CL4 and low voltage is great at $50, or the Mushkin HP2 at $45. Can't break 400 FSB on that CPU anyway at max multiplier.

Heatsink: That E5200 is highly OC'able, especially on that Gigabyte board, so get the Xigmatek HDT-S1283 heatsink and corresponding retention bracket and OC away!

PSU: Corsair 400CX or 450VX, maybe even PCP&C Silencer 370 if you're willing to live with less margin.

Video Card: I'd stay with the 4650, but eVGA has a 9400GT for $40 if you want to save even more on the video card.

HDD: The only drive to get in that capacity range is the Caviar Black 640GB--just get it for the speed, it would beat Dell any day.

P.S. How can you even come on here and even mention buying a Dell as a comparative??? Bloatware, limited upgradeability... ACK! Don't you want that snappiness from an OC'd homebuild??? :D
 

Akebono 98

Distinguished
Dec 5, 2008
560
0
18,980
aevm wrote: "I wouldn't spend $82+$54 on E5200+CNPS 9700. I'd rather spend $165 on an E8400 and use it with the retail cooler."

+1

Funny how we tend to lose sight of those non-overclocked possibilities on these forums, eh?

However, if you just want to OC for fun, then throw a liquid cooler on top of that E8400--now that would really be a barrel of monkeys over that D***!!! :lol:
 

cadder

Distinguished
Nov 17, 2008
1,711
1
19,865
I pondered the CPU question for awhile, and did a lot of reading here as well. I even went back and studied the various system builder marathons and found some interesting results. I compared gaming results with media encoding results, thinking that the gaming results reflected the GPU more than the CPU, and media encoding reflected only the CPU power. (I used the itunes encoding numbers for this comparison).

E5200 at 4.0GHz- 52 sec.
E7300 at 3.8GHz- 55 sec.
E8500 at 4.25GHz- 49 sec.
q6600 at 3.5GHz- 62 sec.
q9650 at 4.1GHz- 49 sec.
i7 920 at 3.7GHz- 54 sec.
i7 920 at 4.0GHz- 50 sec.

So the E5200 based on cpu power alone compares very well to just about anything you can get, and costs half as much as the E8500.

I don't need much cpu horsepower today, and couldn't decide if I wanted dual or quad, but I'm afraid oneday I will need more power. I have an E8500 at work, overclocked to 3.8ghz. Even if I bought the E8400 I would still put an aftermarket cooler on it.

Part of my plan was that if I get the E5200 now and later decide I want something else, it wouldn't be a big deal to buy a new CPU and swap it in.
 

Akebono 98

Distinguished
Dec 5, 2008
560
0
18,980
I believe that you were also participating in Vos17's thread (link) where I just made a post regarding the relative value of older LGA 775 socket processors. Just wanted to link it here as well for your reference.

The moral of the story: a good quality, overclockable LGA 775 mobo is still a great value today--especially in your situation. And a good heatsink is also a good investment in the future.
 

groo

Distinguished
Feb 3, 2008
1,046
6
19,295


not if it doesn't fit the next generation chip, like the i7