I am a photographer and my current build has been very good for the past few years. However, since upgrading to the Nikon D300, it has begun to show its age. The larger file sizes are definitely a bit more demanding, especially when using the adjustment brush in Lightroom 2 with the edge detection turned on. When I am running both Lightroom and Photoshop, things can get really hairy and processing the finished images into jpegs can sometimes take hours depending on the number of images. I am a moderate gamer but I would say the majority of my computer usage is for photo editing.
This is my current system
A8n-sli deluxe Motherboard
Amd x64 3200+
2gb Ram
EVGA 7800gtx
Antec 430 Watt power supply
several hard drives
I am not really looking to do a complete new build yet but I know my upgrade options are extremely limited with my current set up. I am thinking about ordering a new gigabyte motherboard. An intel Core 2 Duo E8500 processor and 4gb of g.skill Ram. This will cost me about $360. For the time being, I will just transplant my old power supply, video card, and hard drives into the new system. Later I plan to upgrade the power supply and video card and probably replace the hard drives for larger ones.
I guess I have two questions. Firstly, am I going to really get the performance boost I am looking for with these new components or am I going to regret not upgrading the video card and power supply right now. Also, do you think the 430 watt power supply will be fine with the newer more powerful processor?
That's a good question. Yes I think you'd see a pretty good speed improvement over your old amd processor. At least for your photo editing stuff. See more of a slight to moderate increase in terms of gaming. You might want to consider a quad core? That is more suited for photo and vidoe editing? duo cores are more suited for gaming. Can't go wrong with either one for the budget your looking at however. (Only other option would be is going for the i7 setup).
I looked at the i7s but it was just too pricey. I compared the e8500 to the q6600 in the charts and the e8500 actually did a bit better than the q6600 in photoshop.
If your sold on your $360 budget then the e8500 is your best bet. If your willing to spend more than I just wanted to have you be aware of the some of the quad core options out there. For example i was thinking more like the q9550. (Q9550 ~$320 + $100 for board = $420). BTW Glad you did your homework, a lot of people that ask for help don't ever look at benchmarks).
You will see a major boost in speed. First intel is an improvment over AMD, specially the older ones. I use the E8500 on a gigabyte board and love it. As far as all around cpu the E8500 is better than the Q6600. However, if you are running photoshop AND lightroom, it is more resource demanding than just running photoshop, you may want the extra 2 cores. The E8500 is faster than the Q6600, but the difference is when you add another task, just a thought. Another area where you can really increase your speeds are hard drives. There has been great increases in speed and storage recently. Keep your eyes open for WD cavair black and velociraptors.
The WD Cavair black 640gb verison is just "about" as fast as a raptor drive. Since it only has two platers and is extremely dense it's probally the best hard drive you can get for the price right now. Segeat has a few that come close, but that WD is very good. so +1 to the above comment.
I got the caviar 640 gb black, and am very happy with it. It is very quick, programs such as Capture NX load up really fast. Oh, and those core 2 duos you mentioned are good for overclocking if you choose to.
It's also not as good. I suggest you study up, especially when you've already been corrected so you don't compound the error.
For example the chart at the end of the monthly graphics card article on this site would've been easy enough to look at;
http://www.tomshardware.com/review [...] 118-7.html It places the 7800 gtx a tier higher than the 9500 gt and 2 higher than ddr2 based 9500 gt that you suggested.
The 9500 gt is dx10 but isn't powerful enough that you would ever want to use it for such. The gtx also came in 512mb varieties but either one has twice the memory bandwidth and ddr3 memory. 7800gtx 256mb is really probably on par with the 9500 512mb ddr3. The only real reason the 9500 might be considered better is heat/power consumption. It's much more efficient and cool.
You are about to answer a thread that has been inactive for more than 6 months. If you still wish to proceed, please ensure that your posting is original and does not duplicate or overlap any prior responses to this thread.