mike1 :
is there a downside to creating three primary partitions? Will I be better off converting the new primary partition to logical if I can do that?
It does
not matter performance wise if the partitions are primary or extended/logical. You only have to care about logical partitions if you need to have more than four partitions on a single disk.
As for performance - I think there are several sides to this:
The disk IO is much higher on the outer edges on the disk than to the end of it. By creating the first partition and making it perhaps 300 GB you could be sure that the files you place there will get the highest IO.
If you want you can then create several other partitions, but the performance will be slightly lower as you get closer to the end of the disk.
More things to concider: If you must often read/write from
both the first and second partition, then the disk head has to move more, which will cost performance.
Also note that newer operating systems like Windows 7 will try to optimize also by placing the mostly used files closer to the edges.
I have myself two 1TB disk (Samsung F3) which I have partitioned as follows:
C: 300 GB - operating system files - on 1th drive
D: 300 GB - data partition for most important files - on 2nd drive
M: 700 GB - data partition for not used much files - on 1th drive
N: 700 GB - data partition for not used much files - on 2th drive
I belive this is the most optimal for me. Having the os and the primary data on partitions close to the outher edges on both disk would give the best performance in total, and it also allows Win7 to place the files at the best places physicaly. On the M and N partition I will place file that I will not use often, so I should get no performance penalty for the moving arms.
Please note that I "like" partitions, so this could perhaps not be for everyone.