harryn said:
Sorry, bit lost here Rain, why do I
have to overclock the memory?
As I said, I'm a photog with reasonable tech knowledge/skills, but not a speed enthusiast. Once i can get smooth panning/zooming without much hassle, I'm happy. Not into the tweaking and refining bits of tech ;-)
The i7 supports the stock 1066MHz memory. However you can get memory rated at 1333,1600,1800,1866,2000 all of which are "technically" overclocked memory. When overclocking you want to reach that magical sleep where your CPU is OCed to max and so is your memory. Because the CPU (exept the Extreme version) has a locked multiplier it limits the speed profiles your memory can use, so faster memory give you the flexibility when OCing. In my opinion 1600 is the sweet spot, it lets you OC without high cost. DDR3 has what is called an XMP profile as well. In the BIOS you just set it to use this profile and it sets all your settings for you to run at the rated speed. Otherwise it will just run the stock intel 1066 speed.
harryn said:
This was exactly my logic. Intel don't want their product to fail and create negative PR for themselves. They don't gain any revenue from aftermarket cooling systems since all the add-on coolers are made by other manufacturers...
So, is this add-on cooling mania like adding tail-fins on a Ferrari - which doesn't actually add performance. Or, is it like adding mag wheels and performance tires on the car - which actually improves performance over stock wheels/tires. Btw, am not a car mod enthusiast either...although i used to review cars. ;-)
The only reason you would need aftermarket cooling to if you are overclocking past a point where the stock cooler isn't sufficient. Heat is ultimatly the enemy of electronic components and you start to reach temps that will decrease the lifespan and efficiency of the CPU. Big coolers disperse heat better for higher clocks. That is why you would need an aftermarket cooler. If you run stock, stick with the stock cooler. Even a moderate OC is fine with it.
harryn said:
Thanks for your input jay2tall. For Cs4/PS4, the accepted wisdom is "run a i7 cpu with ram over 3gb (I'm installing 6gb) and you can get away with a run of the mill GPU..." because PS4 does not access the GPU. So I haven't decided, but wont be anything to write home to mama about.
However, I will be getting into HD video later [I use a Canon 5d MKII ;-) - FYI for the photographic enthusiasts here] and who knows what gpus I will need for other apps like Premiere / Final Cut etc....
That's why I decided to go for a larger psu so that I dont have to upgrade that when I upgrade my video card.
Any opinions on this anybody?
To be honest you want a dedicated video card with a little bit of Umph to is. Even just for Vista itself. I have always put together PC's with video that give people a little flexibility. I know Adobe doesn't really need the GPU but it helps with large displays. Not sure about the other applications but my Favorite GPU for this sort of setup is the ATI HD4670. It doesn't require a PCI-E power connector, but delivers the power most visual apps need. ATI cards are the midrange kings. It has Audio build in if you choose to use the HDMI output connector so your audio runs through the same cable which is nice if you use a TV on it. (not that many use this) Regardless it give the Nvidia 9600gt a run and is pretty cheap at $60 after MIR. Just watch the small fans, they can be noisy. THe HIS is my personal pick and I have used this card in a build already. it has a nice cooler which is VERY quiet.
This is my suggestion:
http://www.newegg.com/Product/Product.aspx?Item=N82E168...