Pentium D 2.8Ghz 2GB DDR2 7300GT 1440x900 He loves gaming, but it's obvious that the 7300GT and PD2.8 just doesn't cut it, especially at 1440x900. Also, his motherboard blows. It only has 2 DIMM slots, and a PCI-E 4x. Also, it doesn't do above 800Mhz FSB... lol He's not picky on graphics, but he really wants to upgrade. He's getting 20FPS in CoD2, even at 1024x768.
He'll probably combine it with an HD4830 in a bit. All he needs is enough to run CoD2 and CoD4 @ 1440x900 High Settings, 2xAA 4xAF. He'll also be doing some minor video editing/encoding. (SD stuff) Is this a good upgrade from a Pentium D 2.8Ghz? I know about the TLB bug, but in a lot of memory intensive programs, the Phenom's actually perform pretty decent.
EDIT: Also, I believe he has oldschool DDR2-533. He has no interest (nor the technical know-how) to overclock. Will DDR2-533 work with the Phenom 9600? I forget how AMD memory/processor stuff works these days.
Message edited by doomsdaydave11 on 04-23-2009 at 01:02:07 AM
It is always worth the time to look at Newegg's combo deals. I have saved a few hundred dollars that way in the past. You might not always get the brand you want but always something comparable.
I rolled onto a Phenom 9600BE combo and it's worked at 2.6GHz like a happy little camper for the last 90 days or so.
If yer bud is going to spend an extra $30 or so dollars I'd suggest snagging the Gigabyte 790x (with sb750) instead of the 9950BE.
Much better mobo, possible Crossfire down the road and should run that Phenom 9600BE at 2.5-2.6GHz at stock volts (and 95w) with no problemos ...
He does not have any technical know how when it comes to hardware. If something went wrong with the overclock, I would be held accountable.
He also does not have any interest in CF or SLI. He is not picky on graphics at all. Medium or high settings at 1440x900 is really plenty for him. All he wants is to run the game smoothly. I don't think he'll be upgrading his monitor any time soon, with the current economic issues, so a single card will be fine.
Really, any quality motherboard with 4 RAM slots and a PCI-E 2.0 slot is more then enough.
He does not have any technical know how when it comes to hardware. If something went wrong with the overclock, I would be held accountable.
He also does not have any interest in CF or SLI. He is not picky on graphics at all. Medium or high settings at 1440x900 is really plenty for him. All he wants is to run the game smoothly. I don't think he'll be upgrading his monitor any time soon, with the current economic issues, so a single card will be fine.
Really, any quality motherboard with 4 RAM slots and a PCI-E 2.0 slot is more then enough.
Settin' that cpu multi to 13 almost strained my finger
edit: I fergit. For the most part (primarily with the 9600 but it sometimes helps with the 9950) unganging the memory controller will give yah a touch more stability ...
hey, generally current games don't really support more than 2 cores. the Kuma 7750 might be worth looking into for you. Its basically a 2.7ghz Phenom 1 with 2 cores for $60.
hey, generally current games don't really support more than 2 cores. the Kuma 7750 might be worth looking into for you. Its basically a 2.7ghz Phenom 1 with 2 cores for $60.
I am aware of this chip, and thought about it too, but my buddy will be doing quite a bit of video encoding, which already uses (with the right codecs) most of the cores. Also, he intends this CPU to last him a very long time (3+ years), and I figured the 9950 would be his best option for $140.... if future games are to make more use of extra cores.
------------------------------E8400 3.6Ghz | 4GB DDR2-800 | HD4870 | 780GB HDD Space | VX550W | WinXP | Win7-64 | Ubuntu Studio 8.10
Reply to doomsdaydave11
IMO for what you want to achieve, I personally would drop the CPU back to an X2 and bump the GPU up to a 4850 or 3870. You can put the Phenom in at a later time, the 3.0 Deneb is the only one I would consider for my board to replace the X2 6000+
I'd also rather go with the 720, but then I'd also be thinking about overclocking it, and maybe getting an ASRock board to try and unlock the 4th core. Anyway the Penom II architecture is a little better clock for clock than the original Phenom architecture. Also the 720 is faster and runs cooler, so while it may suffer a little in video encoding it will generally be faster in games than the 9950 and you won't have to worry about the heat as much.
------------------------------Playing X-Men Origins: Wolverine Athlon 64 X2 5000+ @3.24 Brisbane | GIGABYTE GA-MA790X-DS4 | 4GB Mushkin DDR2 1066 | Plextor 760A| 2x 3850 512M CF| WD 1TB Black| Fortron Blue Storm II 500W | APEVIA X-Dreamer Black | Win XP Pro & Vista Buisness 32bit
Reply to megamanx00
Yeah, I mean that should be fine... the P1 is no overclocker, but we've already established that's not important, hehe. In any case from what I've seen the 9950 is fairly similar to a Q6600 (without the Q's great overclockability of course) ... not great, but not awful.
Message edited by EQPlayer on 04-23-2009 at 08:12:24 AM
You are about to answer a thread that has been inactive for more than 6 months. If you still wish to proceed, please ensure that your posting is original and does not duplicate or overlap any prior responses to this thread.