GFX: Geforce 9000er or Radeon 3000er Series
CPU: Core 2 Duo 3 GHz or Athlon X2
RAM: 2GB with DualChannel mode
If so,then a HD 4870X2 would do the job.
huh....I recall on their faq (its been awhile) it said they wanted the game to be able to run well on a wide range of systems, gf9+ 3ghz core2 isnt exactly wide range.
In the end it all depends on how they program it. If they make every "sprite" an AI thread, then yes it might require a lot of CPU juice. Then again, if they use old single-threaded AI schemes and pile-up the eye-candy, it will require lots of GPU. My guess is that it will be more like Supreme Commander and tend toward the use of multiple cores so your quad CPU is good to have.
As for video, I would suggest to wait unless you have good reasons to buy right now. Since there is no release date yet (or even release quarter), we can safely assume it won't be out for at least 6 months. Video card prices will drop a bit more and we might even have a new wave of cards out from ATI (32nm).
------------------------------The capacity to learn is a gift; The ability to learn is a skill; The willingness to learn is a choice. - Rebec of Ginaz
Reply to Zenthar
It's confirmed that SC2's in-game physics are based on the "Havok" emulation engine which ATI (AMD) owns. I don't know if this will make ATI cards the clear pick, but it's worth noting.
Nvidia cards can still run Havok based games, they just aren't optimized, correct? I'd actually like to hear a good explanation.
If it was only the resolution, I would agree, but adding 4xAA and 8xAF can be taxing.
------------------------------The capacity to learn is a gift; The ability to learn is a skill; The willingness to learn is a choice. - Rebec of Ginaz
Reply to Zenthar
You are about to answer a thread that has been inactive for more than 6 months. If you still wish to proceed, please ensure that your posting is original and does not duplicate or overlap any prior responses to this thread.