It's a few hundred megs, but you don't need to have the game to use it.
The ranked feature is pretty neat, at 1920X1200 DX10 no AA I score better than 98% of people who have run the benchmark. Give it a run and post some score!
I'm just wondering, how this scoring system works. It gives you a position of sorts but i ain't sure how it sorts people out, i ran it with everything maxed, including dx10.1 and 4 x AA, highest quality and got this
Does this mean that my score was worse than 45% of those who ran the same settings or what?
------------------------------I'm a git, deal with it.
What I think is different from this game too, is that its more dependant on graphics than CPU. Since it doesn't utilize dual core CPUs fully just like the previous stalker.
Like I said try overclocking your video cards, and you'll see a very good response from the game.
------------------------------Folding@HOME Team: 163116
Lapped CPU
Reply to L1qu1d
The first stalker was a great game just very poor coding made it hitch bad but I did enjoy the game play. Didn't buy the second one not willing to pay that much for something they pushed out early a second time, maybe I should have looked to see how this one ran before I made my mind up to not buy it. Did it also have some DRM on it like bioshock I won't buy that either it only effects the people that pay for it usually they have it cracked in the first week if not sooner from release.
You are about to answer a thread that has been inactive for more than 6 months. If you still wish to proceed, please ensure that your posting is original and does not duplicate or overlap any prior responses to this thread.