jassao

Distinguished
Mar 18, 2009
103
0
18,680
Hi everybody,
Recently I've got the option to change my Q8200 2.33ghz for a E8500 3.16ghz, I can't make my mind on this so I'm asking...

My PC is just a game station, I do my work on it but nothing demanding just big worksheets and databases.
I play all recent games (FPS, RTS, Driving, etc) and I'm willing to overclock (q8200 is overclocked to 2.8Ghz and doesn't give much room to further OC).

My set up is:
Mobo: Foxconn Mars
PSU: Ultra lifetime series 750W
Cooler: Tuniq tower 120
GPU: ATI 4850x2
Ram : Kingston 2GBx2 800mhz
OS: Vista ultimate 64x
Case: Ultra something (dont remenber) Modded to exhaust GPU heat.

I dont have money to purchase a new cpu at the moment, so I was thinking about this trade.

Will my 4850x2 work better with E8500? I just care about gaming performance.

Thanks in advance for opinions!
 

BoBzzz

Distinguished
Jul 10, 2008
52
0
18,630
For anything but GTA IV you would probably see better FPS with an overclocked E8500 but I would venture to guess that many games will soon be better optimized for more cores.
 

BruceOTB

Distinguished
Mar 5, 2009
318
0
18,780
i have the same dilemma too. im looking to upgrade my e4600 to either an e8400 or q8200. yeah i play gta 4, and right now, it killing my computer. but i play a lot of other games too other than gta4. l4d, cod5, grid, company of heroes, cyrsis. im choosing between these two because they have almost the same price. i do casual photo editing and movies. those are just the things i do in my pc. other than surfing ofcourse. so which processor is for me? i dont plan to oc because my board doesnt allow it.

mobo: intel DG31PR
ram: 4gb ddr2 800
vc: 9800gt 1gb

need suggestions...
 

hundredislandsboy

Distinguished
I was in your shoes last year, debating between the e8400 and a quad core. I've been completely happy with the e8400 and given a choice like yours today I'd go with the e8500. There are so many reviews that show the e8000 series are much better value for gaming and overclocking.
 

huron

Distinguished
Jun 4, 2007
2,420
0
19,860
+1 for the E8500. It's going to be better for gaming.

The quad would be better for encoding and multi-tasking in many areas, but for games, I'd stick with the E8500.

 

hardwaretechy

Distinguished
Jun 15, 2008
124
0
18,710
E8400/E8500 -- if you're only gaming the faster speed per core will improve your performance. With the quad you'll still be slower even if you overclock to 2.8 and then you get all the excess heat/power/etc from the 2 cores that you won't be using.

Current games are hardly optimized for 2 cores, none that matter for more cores than that. Speed is your best performance enhancer here.
 

jassao

Distinguished
Mar 18, 2009
103
0
18,680


Thanks for the clear comment about gaming, that was what I was looking for.

I might be upgrading my pc next year so I should disregard those comments of "downgrading" to C2D (comments from my friends, not here).

I think I almost make up my mind, but 5mins ago I received a new option q6600, most likely I'm changing my Q8200 to a different CPU and I know general concensus is Q6600 over Q8200 for gaming (many many topics and comments saying that).

So base on my motherboard (Foxconn mars) which option would be better E8500 or Q6600? their temps are around the same level when overclocked arent they? If we go with pure speed (when overclocked) would E8500 be the best option?

Thanks!
 

jassao

Distinguished
Mar 18, 2009
103
0
18,680


Q8200 stock 333*7= 2.33ghz, oc'd 400*7=2.8Ghz, since my ram is only 800mhz and overclocks really bad, that's the safest and easiest OC i can get.

I have tried 428*7=3.0ghz and it runs ok for a few hours, then it becomes unstable.

At 2.8Ghz is 20% OC and at 3.0ghz is 30% oc. At 1600fsb I can get 3.6ghz on a q6600, and thats because the 7x multiplier on the Q8200 sucks for OC.

that is why.
 

hefox

Distinguished
Jan 24, 2007
798
0
19,060
I think you should do it. At least you can OC more E8500 where with Q8200 you are already stuck to 2.8 Ghz, let's say 3. So go for it. Next time you should think more before you buy. You should look for something more "future proof".
 

jassao

Distinguished
Mar 18, 2009
103
0
18,680
You're right, I rushed my decision with this Q8200.

I thought q8200 was future proof, it actually might be, but not for my needs.

Hopefully I will improve the performance with either of the new options.

Thanks!
 

ainarssems

Distinguished
Mar 4, 2008
723
1
19,010
Go for q6600.Overclock it to 3.2(400x8) or 3.6(400x9)GHz, I have mine @3.2GHz and cannot be happier. It will do 3.6 as well but due to heat and and no real neeed to go higher I leave it @3.2