bloodandsoil

Distinguished
Nov 18, 2006
246
0
18,690
Hello experts,

My BFG 8800 GTX recently crapped out and so I am in the market to buy a replacement video card for my PC (Intel Core 2 Duo E6600 and 4 GB memory).

My budget is around $150 and I (unfortunately) require an Nvidia card since the linux ATI drivers are not up to snuff (yet).

Does the GeForce GTX 260 offer much of a performance advantage over the GeForce 9800 GTX+?

And, I see a Sparkle brand GeForce 9800 GTX+ on Newegg.com for $145. Would anyone recommmend this brand?
 

Craxbax

Distinguished
Mar 26, 2007
380
0
18,780
Yes, the 260 is much better but the 9800TX+ is a solid performer. Sparkle brand may leave a lot to be desired and the cooler exhausts into the case. I would opt to spend $14 more on the EVGA SC card (before $20 MIR) plus it is already OC'D.
 

scrumhalf

Distinguished
Jun 22, 2004
173
0
18,680
By the naming conventions, the EVGA 55nm cards are numbered 896-P3-125x, and the 65nm cards are numbered 896-P3-126x. Also, the 65nm cards have a more orange casing, whereas the 55nm cards have a red casing. Have a look at the pics:
1255 GTX 260 and 1265 GTX 260.

Note, these are the Core 216 editions of the card, I left out the Core 192 versions, since they're all 65nm, and really aren't worth the $20 savings. YMMV, but I bought the stock speed 55nm card and haven't had any problem overclocking to the Superclocked edition speeds.
 

scrumhalf

Distinguished
Jun 22, 2004
173
0
18,680
Not much in performance difference at stock speeds, but runs cooler, overclocks better (here's the performance gain), and uses less power.