Intel realised if they did that then all of their current CPU's would be illegal to make and they would have to go back to x86 instead of x86-64 and remove IMC's from their i5/7 line.
Intel realised if they did that then all of their current CPU's would be illegal to make and they would have to go back to x86 instead of x86-64 and remove IMC's from their i5/7 line.
after AMD pulls their licenses that is.
/facepalm
IMC is not pioneered by AMD, but rather Intel and DEC Alpha.
AMD will not pull x86_64 license, because doing so means ending the business
Please get your facts straight.
------------------------------Intel will not take the top spot, or probably the top 3 spot back for the forseeable future. Not even with 32nm and more cores will intel be able to beat Jaguar. - JennyH the AMDiot, Nov 2009
Reply to yomamafor1
No. The license / copyright litigation between companies usually takes YEARS before they get a court hearing, let alone a verdict. After the verdict has been handed down, the losing company will file for appeal, which will, again, take YEARS before a retrial is issued.
So in short, the litigation is still on-going, but it will be a while before we hear anything about them.
------------------------------Intel will not take the top spot, or probably the top 3 spot back for the forseeable future. Not even with 32nm and more cores will intel be able to beat Jaguar. - JennyH the AMDiot, Nov 2009
Reply to yomamafor1
No. The license / copyright litigation between companies usually takes YEARS before they get a court hearing, let alone a verdict. After the verdict has been handed down, the losing company will file for appeal, which will, again, take YEARS before a retrial is issued.
So in short, the litigation is still on-going, but it will be a while before we hear anything about them.
Yep. Unless of course AMD & Intel went on the Judge Judy show to plead their cases . Then we would have a verdict rendered in about 12 minutes, right after a commercial break
This may be settled out-of-court, anyways. IIRC, the licensing agreement is up for renewal soon. Intel may be just trying to force some changes into the new license.
IRT x64 - I believe the sharing technologies agreement gives each party essential ownership of each other's x86 enhancements (ie - Intel can use x64, but can not sell or license it to another company; same with AMD and SSE4, etc). If AMD voided this agreement, I believe Intel could still maintain the right to use x64, but any enhancements to it would have to be seperate from any enhancements AMD chooses to add.
The license referred to in the OP is the license for AMD to make x86 chips - not the shared technologies agreement.
You are about to answer a thread that has been inactive for more than 6 months. If you still wish to proceed, please ensure that your posting is original and does not duplicate or overlap any prior responses to this thread.