GDDR3 is significantly faster than GDDR2. you can see it just in the clock speeds. GDDR2 cards are so obsolete that there aren't even any on tom's most recent gpu chart. simply put, the GDDR3 would be much faster even though it only has half the total memory. and either way, you won't get an acceptable framerate in crysis on either of the cards.
Message edited by Nik_I on 03-05-2009 at 06:39:20 PM
------------------------------ECS A780GM-A, Phenom II x3 710, 4GB Corsair @800Mhz, HIS Radeon 4850, Seagate 7200.11 500GB, Auzentech X-Plosion 7.1 Cinema, LiteOn DL-DVD w/Lightscribe, ASUS TA-863, OCZ StealthXStream 500W, Samsung Syncmaster T240, Windows 7 Ultimate x64
Reply to Nik_I
Nice. As for Crysis, I have given up on the idea of being able to play it. The cost would be too high to bother just yet. Maybe in the next coupe of years as better cards come out and become more affordable. I have lost my interest in wanting to play this game.
Not bad at all for affordable Multimedia and gaming on my screen which is not a HD ready monitor.
ATI Radeon cards seem to be on top on a technical and theoretical level, but how about nVidia? They seem to have slower clocks, less memory, etc, but benchmark performances are pretty close in real world tests. How about nVidia?
Again, would it make a huge difference which processor? More Cores? or Faster Speed? Because if speed is all I need, I can get a 2.8 Ghz single core processor or something with Hyper Threading. The Intel E8400 is a bit out there for me price wise.
Thanks.
Message edited by ocd on 03-06-2009 at 09:14:00 PM
Nice. As for Crysis, I have given up on the idea of being able to play it. The cost would be too high to bother just yet. Maybe in the next coupe of years as better cards come out and become more affordable. I have lost my interest in wanting to play this game.
if your going to get one of the 3850s you should definately get the gddr3 version. and dont think that you cant run crysis. i have a 3850 almost exactly like that one spec wise. its an msi and looks a bit cooler but that doesnt really matter. if its stock u can run crysis on high at a 1440X900 resolution, 2X AA, and get 20fps average in the open. if ur in more enclosed space its more like 26fps. when i over clocked mine with riva tuner i gained about 7 - 12 fps on average. so a constant 25 - 3x fps for crysis looks really good. most games have to have like 40 fps to play as good as crysis can with half that. If you dont like the idea of over clocking then run it at 1280X800 res, 2X AA, everything on medium. u'll get like 50+ fps and btw crysis on medium looks better than almost any other game on their highest settings. just something to keep in mind
well. i have a phenom 9600 black edition 2.3GHz stock. i have it overclocked at 2.7 GHZ stable. it is a quad core but my friend is using a dual core for his. either way i'd say you'll need at least a 2.5 GHz dual core so you can take advantage of the multicore function crysis uses. for gaming a dual core is a minimum requirement. you can get an amd 2.7 GHz for like 65 bucks free ship.
I've got my eye on that SAPPHIRE 100248L Radeon HD 3850 512MB 256-bit GDDR3 PCI Express 2.0 x16 as well and I was wondering what should i get for better performance:
It compensates. The memory is overclocked by 200mhz on top of the architectural enhancements and the 30mhz core overclock. Check the charts on here if you wish
if you can afford two 3850s then you might as well just get a 4870. its only like 150 to 190 depending on if you want 512 or 1 gig. it will destroy the 3850s and anything else ati in that price range.